Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: A randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Urology - Tập 20 Số 2 - Trang 220-226 - 2013
Feng Pan1,2, Lianjun Pan2, Aixia Zhang2, Yong Liu2, Fenglei Zhang2, Yutian Dai1
1Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University, School of Medicine
2State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Andrology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Tóm tắt

ObjectivesTo compare the outcomes and complications of three methods of circumcision in a Chinese pediatric population.MethodsA total of 120 children were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I was submitted to circumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device according to Yan's method; group II was submitted to circumcision using the same device, but according to Peng's methods; group III was operated on by using the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The three groups were compared mainly by the following outcomes: duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, cosmetic effect, and the rates of edema, dehiscence, scarring, adhesion and infection.ResultsGroups I and II had less intraoperative bleeding. In terms of the duration of surgery, group I was the quickest. Pain scores in using the Shenghuan disposable device were higher at 6 h after surgery compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The percentage of patients using paracetamol in group II was higher than that in group III at 12 h after surgery. Other complications were similar, and all three groups had successful outcomes.ConclusionsCircumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device represents a safer and time‐saving option compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique, with better cosmetic outcomes. Yan's method seems to be better than Peng's method when using the Shenghuan disposable device for circumcision in children.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/sti.74.5.368

10.1002/bies.20654

Tucker SC, 2001, Circumcision: a refined technique and 5 year review, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 83, 121

10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.01.005

10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.008

10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.05.006

10.1007/s11255-007-9275-x

10.1007/s00383-010-2632-3

10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.018

10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00411.x

Yan B, 2010, Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases, Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue, 16, 250

Li HN, 2010, Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness, Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue, 16, 325

10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182158967

Elder JS, 2002, Campbell's Urology, 2335

10.1100/tsw.2011.31

10.1007/BF03011810

10.1080/00207144.2011.594740

Ge CG, 2005, Clinical observation of adult circumcision with removal ring device, Chin. J. Mod. Med., 15, 3028

10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00467.x

10.1016/j.ucl.2004.04.011

10.1155/2008/606123

10.1053/jpsu.2002.35005

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Urology

Tập 20 Số 2

220-226

Thông tin tác giả