Chronic Mild Stress (CMS) Revisited: Consistency and Behavioural-Neurobiological Concordance in the Effects of CMS

Neuropsychobiology - Tập 52 Số 2 - Trang 90-110 - 2005
Paul Willner1
1Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK

Tóm tắt

The chronic mild stress (CMS) model of depression has high validity but has in the past been criticized for being difficult to replicate. However, a large number of recent publications have confirmed that CMS causes behavioural changes in rodents that parallel symptoms of depression. This review summarizes studies from over sixty independent research groups that have reported decreases in reactivity to rewards, and a variety of other depression-like behaviours, in rats or mice, following exposure to CMS. Together, these changes are referred to as a ‘depressive’ behavioural profile. Almost every study that has examined the effects of chronic antidepressant treatment in these procedures has reported that antidepressants were effective in reversing or preventing these ‘depressive’ behavioural changes. (The single exception is a study in which the duration of treatment was too brief to constitute an adequate trial.) There are also a handful of reports of CMS causing significant effects in the opposite direction, termed here an ‘anomalous’ behavioural profile. There are six neurobiological parameters that have been studied in both ‘anhedonic’ and ‘anomalous’ animals: psychostimulant and place-conditioning effects of dopamine agonists; dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor number and message; inhibition of dopamine turnover by quinpirole, and beta-adrenergic receptor binding. On all six measures, CMS caused opposite effects in animals displaying ‘depressive’ and ‘anomalous’ profiles. Thus, there is overwhelming evidence that under appropriate experimental conditions, CMS can cause antidepressant-reversible depressive-like effects in rodents; however, the ‘anomalous’ profile that is occasionally reported appears to be a genuine phenomenon, and these two sets of behavioural effects appear to be associated with opposite patterns of neurobiological changes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007%2FBF00187257

10.1016%2F0149-7634%2881%2990004-X

10.1016%2F0091-3057%2882%2990053-3

10.1007%2Fs002130050456

10.1007%2Fs002130050473

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2894%2900286-E

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2896%2900305-8

10.1177%2F026988119701100408

10.1007%2Fs002130050471

10.1007%2Fs002130050472

10.1016%2FS0006-3223%2802%2901405-1

10.1016%2Fj.brainres.2003.08.047

10.1038%2Fsj.bjp.0702589

10.1007%2Fs00213-004-2103-4

10.1016%2FS0924-977X%2899%2900043-7

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2803%2900050-7

10.1016%2Fj.brainres.2004.05.019

10.1016%2Fj.lfs.2004.10.022

10.1016%2Fj.lfs.2003.06.030

10.1002%2Fptr.1391

10.1124%2Fmol.62.6.1332

10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2803%2900252-3

10.1016%2Fj.physbeh.2005.02.007

10.3109%2F10253899709014740

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2895%2902256-2

10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2899%2900110-2

10.1016%2F0014-2999%2894%2990516-9

10.1016%2FS0014-2999%2896%2900675-9

10.1016%2F0014-2999%2895%2900697-4

10.1016%2FS0306-4522%2897%2900136-X

10.1007%2Fs002130050268

10.1007%2Fs002130050469

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2898%2900060-2

10.1016%2FS0006-8993%2803%2903087-7

10.1007%2FBF02975433

10.1007%2FBF02244188

10.1007%2FBF02247719

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2894%2990316-6

10.1016%2FS0014-2999%2897%2901412-X

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2897%2900042-5

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2893%2990351-F

10.1016%2FS0306-4530%2898%2900084-5

10.1159%2F000071477

10.1016%2FS0889-1591%2803%2900109-0

10.1016%2FS0192-0561%2898%2900050-2

10.1007%2Fs00213-001-0946-5

10.1007%2FBF02246218

10.1016%2FS0014-2999%2800%2900332-0

10.1016%2F0924-977X%2896%2983154-3

10.1007%2Fs002130050464

10.1016%2FS0306-4530%2800%2900040-8

10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2800%2900302-8

10.1016%2FS0306-4530%2899%2900051-7

10.1007%2FBF00212853

10.1007%2FBF02245655

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2897%2900425-3

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2894%2900204-I

10.1097%2F00008877-199902000-00007

10.1016%2Fj.bbr.2004.04.008

10.1038%2Fsj.npp.1300532

10.1177%2F026988110201600201

10.1007%2Fs002130050470

10.1016%2F0091-3057%2892%2990519-L

10.1016%2FS0149-7634%2805%2980192-7

10.1016%2FS0091-3057%2899%2900031-3

10.1007%2FBF02688795

10.1016%2FS0006-8993%2801%2902256-9

10.1016%2FS0924-977X%2802%2900076-7

10.1016%2Fj.pbb.2003.08.002

10.1016%2FS0197-0186%2802%2900080-3

10.1023%2FA%3A1024988113978

10.1159%2F000079415

10.1016%2Fj.physbeh.2004.01.013

10.1016%2FS0149-7634%2805%2980193-9

10.1007%2Fs002130050465

10.1016%2FS0006-3223%2899%2900236-X

10.1089/thy.2005.15.777

10.1016%2FS0893-133X%2899%2900027-5

10.1016%2FS1385-299X%2800%2900056-8

10.1016%2FS0006-8993%2802%2903273-0

10.1089/105072502760143791

10.1055%2Fs-2007-1014338

10.1007%2Fs002130050566

10.1172/JCI6397

10.1016%2F0091-3057%2891%2990599-W

10.3109%2F10253899809167291

10.1046%2Fj.1471-4159.1999.0722039.x

10.1080%2F10253890310001602829

10.1016%2FS0928-4257%2800%2900148-0

10.1016%2F0031-9384%2887%2990182-X

10.1007%2FBF02249333

10.1073%2Fpnas.092012099

10.1016%2Fj.biopsych.2004.10.032

10.1097%2F00001756-200111160-00018

10.1016%2FS0006-3223%2899%2900253-X

10.1016%2FS0278-5846%2803%2900051-4

10.1016%2Fj.bbr.2004.04.020

10.1023%2FA%3A1025770616068

10.1126%2Fscience.1083328

10.1016%2FS0006-3223%2896%2900058-3

10.1038%2F266730a0

10.1007%2FBF02244999

10.1007%2Fs002130000650

10.1016%2FS0306-4522%2802%2900248-8

10.1007%2FBF02246965

10.1007%2FBF02246966

10.1007%2FBF02244853

10.1210/er.2009-0007

10.1007%2FBF02244322

10.1007%2FBF02245566

10.1016%2F0014-2999%2894%2990312-3

10.1016%2FS0091-3057%2801%2900778-X

10.1016%2Fj.neurobiolaging.2003.10.013

10.1016%2F0091-3057%2895%2902173-6

10.1016%2Fj.ejphar.2004.06.069

10.1038%2Fsj.npp.1300601

10.1155%2FNP.2003.327

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2800%2900216-X

10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2802%2900088-8

10.1590%2FS0100-879X1999001000009

10.1016%2FS0376-6357%2800%2900080-2

10.1016%2FS0306-4530%2801%2900092-0

10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2802%2900222-X

10.1023%2FB%3ANERE.0000042219.98446.e7

10.1097%2F00001756-200112210-00017

10.1016%2F0024-3205%2892%2990063-U

10.1016%2FS0361-9230%2898%2900179-8

10.1016%2FS0893-133X%2801%2900234-2

10.1016%2FS0278-5846%2801%2900297-4

10.1016%2FS1567-5769%2801%2900190-4

10.1006%2Fbrbi.2001.0632

10.1016%2FS0006-2952%2802%2901457-0

10.1016%2FS0165-0327%2800%2900182-8

10.1080%2F09629359990621

10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2802%2900811-9

10.1073/pnas.0804604105

10.1016%2FS0047-6374%2899%2900107-4

10.1016%2FS0306-4530%2899%2900015-3

10.1007%2Fs00213-003-1498-7

10.1016%2FS0304-3940%2899%2900335-3

10.1080%2F10253890310001603648

10.1016%2Fj.brainres.2004.04.036

10.1007%2FBF00442264

10.1007%2FBF00442264

10.1016%2FS0091-3057%2899%2900191-4

10.1016%2FS0091-3057%2899%2900261-0

10.1016%2Fj.bbr.2004.05.018

10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.4132-03.2004

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Neuropsychobiology

Tập 52 Số 2

90-110

Thông tin tác giả