Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program

American Economic Review - Tập 101 Số 4 - Trang 1180-1210 - 2011
Jason Abaluck1, Jonathan Gruber1
1Department of Economics, MIT, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142.

Tóm tắt

We evaluate the choices of elders across their insurance options under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug plan, using a unique dataset of prescription drug claims matched to information on the characteristics of choice sets. We document that elders place much more weight on plan premiums than on expected out-of-pocket costs; value plan financial characteristics beyond any impacts on their own financial expenses or risk; and place almost no value on variance-reducing aspects of plans. Partial equilibrium welfare analysis implies that welfare would have been 27 percent higher if patients had all chosen rationally. (JEL D12, I11, J14)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1509/jmkg.65.3.50.18330

10.2165/00002512-199915050-00004

10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00463.x

10.1111/j.1475-4932.2007.00393.x

10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995

10.1257/aer.98.5.2127

10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00834.x

10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403