Children’s Surnames, Moral Dilemmas

Gender and Society - Tập 24 Số 4 - Trang 499-525 - 2010
Colleen N. Nugent1
1Rutgers University

Tóm tắt

This content analysis examines online accounts of choices of marital and child surnames to understand the predominance of exclusively patrilineal surnames. I demonstrate how surnaming processes present the classic tension between commitment to self and others as moral dilemmas of self versus family, children, and spouse. Social and cultural mechanisms create an either/or exclusive framing and a false dichotomy where women’s selves and others’ needs are incompatible. I also show how some parents reconceptualize family, children, and expectations for men and women, which helps reconfigure dilemmas into a both/and inclusive framework and permits outcomes integrating self, family, children, and partnership. This study illustrates how maintaining a system that promotes giving fathers’ surnames to children as the only proper choice feeds the inertia of micro- and macro-structures that reflect and reinforce gendered differences in moral responsibility regarding self-sacrifice for family, children, and spouses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/1363460705050857

Bianchi, S.M., 2006, Changing rhythms of American family life. Rose series in sociology

Blair-Loy, M., 2003, Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives

Boxer, D., 2005, Women & Language, 28, 1

Brightman, J., 1994, American Demographics, 16, 9

Cherlin, A., 1978, Psychology Today

Connell, R.W., 1987, Gender & power

Connell, R.W., 2002, Gender

Connell, R.W., 2005, Masculinities, 2

Coontz, S., 2000, The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap

Erera, P.I., 2002, Family diversity: Continuity and change in the contemporary family, 10.4135/9781452225517

Fisher, K., 2006, Gender convergence in the American Heritage Time Use Study (AHTUS). ISER Working Paper 2006-25

10.1023/A:1019613819247

10.1080/10570318909374315

10.1177/0891243202016001002

10.1257/0895330041371268

Hays, S., 1996, The cultural contradictions of motherhood

10.1007/s11199-006-9133-9

10.1007/BF00287826

10.2307/353926

10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00203-3

10.1177/089124388002003004

10.1023/A:1015474919530

10.1177/0265407596134007

10.2224/sbp.2009.37.5.687

Lang, M.M., Paper presented at the 10th anniversary conference of the Council on Contemporary Families

Lieberson, S., 2000, A matter of taste: How names, fashions, and culture change

MacDougall, P.R., 1985, Law and Inequality, 3, 91

Monger, R., 2009, U.S. legal permanent residents: 2008

Murray, T.E., 1997, American Midwest. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 45, 163, 10.1179/nam.1997.45.3.163

10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00497.x

Ogburn, W.F., 1957, Sociology and Social Research, 41, 167

Pew Internet & American Life Project., 2009, Trend data: Who’s online

Reaney, P.H., 1967, The origin of English surnames

Risman, B.J., 1998, Gender vertigo: American families in transition

Robinson, John P., 1999, Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time, 2

10.1179/nam.2000.48.2.105

Stacey, J., 1996, In the name of the family: Rethinking family values in the post-modern age

10.3138/jcfs.29.3.585

10.1525/9780520941793

SuperMouse., 2009, Fluther online community: General question section

10.1300/J155v07n02_06

10.1080/10714420490280198

10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2

10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00122.x

10.1007/BF00989288

10.7208/chicago/9780226924908.001.0001