Children caring for robots: Expanding computational thinking frameworks to include a technological ethic of care

Alač, 2011, When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics, Social Studies of Science, 41, 893, 10.1177/0306312711420565 Ames, 2018, Hackers, computers, and cooperation: A critical history of logo and constructionist learning, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1, 10.1145/3274287 Angeli, 2019 Angeli, 2020, Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges, Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185 Angeli, 2020, Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy, Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018 Bakala, 2021, Preschool children, robots, and computational thinking: A systematic review, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100337 Bang, 2015, Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 530, 10.1002/tea.21204 Benjamin, 2019 Bernstein, 2008, Searching for signs of intelligent life: An investigation of young children’s beliefs about robot intelligence, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 225, 10.1080/10508400801986116 Bers, 2020 Bers, 2019, Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms, Computers & Education, 138, 130, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.013 Bers, 2010, Tangible programming in early childhood, High-Tech Tots: Childhood in A Digital World, 49, 49 Brady, 2020 Browne, 2021 Cannella, 1997 Charmaz, 2014 Clarke, 2005 Clarke-Midura, 2021, How young children engage in and shift between reference frames when playing with coding toys, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100250 Clarke-Midura, 2019, The building blocks of coding: A comparison of early childhood coding toys, Information and Learning Sciences, 10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0059 Clarke-Midura, 2021, Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: the case of algorithmic thinking, Computer Science Education, 31, 117, 10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988 Croft, 2017, Leading the change toward education for sustainability in early childhood education, He Kupu the Word, 5, 53/60 Davies, 1990, Positioning: The discursive production of selves, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43, 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x de Jong, 2020, Intentional acceptance of social robots: Development and validation of a self-report measure for children, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 139, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102426 DeLiema, D., et al. (2020). Debugging as a context for collaborative reflection on problem-solving processes. In Deeper learning, communicative competence, and critical thinking: innovative, research-based strategies for development in 21st century classrooms (pp. 209–228). Denis, 2015, Material ordering and care of things, Science, Technology & Human Values, 40, 338, 10.1177/0162243914553129 Duhn, 2012, Making ’place’ for ecological sustainability in early childhood education, Environmental Education Research, 18, 10.1080/13504622.2011.572162 Gabrys, 2011 Gibbons, 2007, Playing the ruins: The philosophy of care in early childhood education, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8, 123, 10.2304/ciec.2007.8.2.123 Haraway, 2016 Hodgins, 2015, Wanderings with waste, Journal of the Canadian Association for Young Children, 40, 88 Kafai, 2019, From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education, ACM Inroads, 11, 44, 10.1145/3381887 Kafai, Y. B., et al. (2019). Stitching the loop with electronic textiles: Promoting equity in high school students’ competencies and perceptions of computer science. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 1176–1182). Kenney, 2019, Fables of response-ability: Feminist science studies as didactic literature, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5, 1, 10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29582 Keune, 2019, Recognition in makerspaces: Supporting opportunities for women to ’make’ a STEM career, Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 368, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.013 Lachney, 2020, Historicizing making and doing: Seymour Papert, Sherry Turkle, and epistemological foundations of the maker movement, History and Technology, 36, 54, 10.1080/07341512.2020.1759302 Laurie, 2021, The role of robotic toys in shaping play and joint engagement in autistic children: Implications for future design, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction Lepawsky, 2018 Livingstone, 2010 Martin, 2015, The politics of care in technoscience, Social Studies of Science, 45, 625, 10.1177/0306312715602073 McNerney, 2004, From turtles to tangible programming bricks: explorations in physical language design, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 326, 10.1007/s00779-004-0295-6 Montessori, 1967 Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2015 Papert, 1980 Pea, 2012, Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8-to 12-year-old girls., Developmental Psychology, 48, 327, 10.1037/a0027030 Pérez, 2016 Peter, 2021, Can social robots affect children’s prosocial behavior? An experimental study on prosocial robot models, Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106712 Phillips, 2019, Sustaining affective resonance: Co-constructing care in a school-based digital design studio, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1532, 10.1111/bjet.12799 Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017 Rogers, 2000, When methods matter: Qualitative methods issues is psychology Rudakoff, 2019, 13 Sengupta, 2021 Shumway, 2021, Kindergarten students: Mathematics knowledge at work: the mathematics for programming robot toys, Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 1, 10.1080/10986065.2021.1982666 Silvis, 2019 Silvis, D., Lee, V. R., Clarke-Midura, J., Shumway, J., & Kozlowski, J. (2020). Blending everyday movement and representational infrastructure: An interaction analysis of Kindergarteners coding robot routes. In M. Gresalfi, & L. Horn (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference of the learning sciences. Nashville, TN. Suchman, 2011, Subject objects, Feminist Theory, 12, 119, 10.1177/1464700111404205 Toombs, A. L., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2015). The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: care ethics and cultures of making. CHI, Seoul, Korea. Turkle, 2005 Turkle, S., Breazeal, C., Scasselati, B., & Dasté, O. (2004). Encounters with Kismet and Cog: Children’s relationships with humanoid robots. In Proceedings of IEEE humanoids. Turkle, 1992, Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete., The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 3 van Duuren, 1996, ‘Because a robot’s brain hasn’t got a brain, it just controls itself’ — Children’s attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artefacts, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 363, 10.1007/BF03173278 van Straten, 2020, Child–robot relationship formation: A narrative review of empirical research, International Journal of Social Robotics, 12, 325, 10.1007/s12369-019-00569-0 van Straten, 2020, Transparency about a Robot’s lack of human psychological capacities: Effects on child-robot perception and relationship formation, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 9 Vertesi, 2015 Vinsel, 2020 Wajcman, 1991 Wang, 2020, Teacher’s role in fostering preschoolers’ computational thinking: An exploratory case study, Early Education and Development, 1 Yip, 2019 Yu, 2019, A review of computational toys and kits for young children, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 21, 17, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.04.001