Chicano youth gangs and crime: the creation of a moral panic

Crime, Law and Social Change - Tập 11 - Trang 129-158 - 1987
Marjorie S. Zatz1
1School of Justice Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA

Tóm tắt

The relationship between Chicano gangs, crime, the police, and the Chicano community is complex. Neither the ‘problem’ of youth gangs nor the specialized police units created to cope with this problem arises in a social vacuum. Rather, both emerge from a particular historical structuring of social, economic, and political relations. This paper investigates how and why a ‘moral panic’ arose concerning Chicano youth gangs in Phoenix in the late 1970s and early 1980s. A variety of qualitative and quantitative data from media reports, interviews, and juvenile court records are used to assess whether it was the actual behavior of Chicano youths or the social imagery surrounding them that formed the basis for the ‘gang problem’ in Phoenix. I suggest that the image of gangs, and especially of Chicano gangs, as violent converged with that of Mexicans and Chicanos as ‘different’ to create the threat of disorder. In addition, it was in the interests of the police department to discover the ‘gang problem’ and build an even greater sense of threat so as to acquire federal funding of a specialized unit.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arizona Republic (1978) ‘City will use computer in war on teen gangs.’ 9 September: B1–2. Arizona Republic (1980) ‘Teen-age gangs: Will Phoenix surrender or battle punks?’ 18 June: A6. Arizona Republic (1981) ‘Police chief calls for greater effort to thwart gangs’. 17 October: D5. Becker, Howard S. (1963)Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press. Black, Donald (1976)The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press. Black, Donald (1984) ‘Social control as a dependent variable.’ Pp. 1–36 in: Donald Black (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control Volume 1. New York: Academic Press. Bortner, M.A. (1987)Delinquency and Justice: An Age of Crisis. New York: McGraw-Hill (forthcoming). Chambliss, William J. (1973) ‘The saints and the roughnecks.’Society 11: 24–31. Cohen, Stanley (1972)Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: McGibbon and Kee. Christensen, Jon, Janet Schmidt, and Joel Henderson (1982) ‘The selling of the police: Media, ideology, and crime control.’Contemporary Crises 6: 227–239. Darrough, William D. (1978) ‘When versions collide: Police and the dialectics of accountability.’Urban Life 7: 379–403. Downes, David (1966) ‘The gang myth.’The Listener 75: 534–537. Erlanger, Howard S. (1979) ‘Estrangement, machismo and gang violence.’Social Science Quarterly 60: 235–248. Fagan, Jeffrey, Eliot Hartstone, Cary Rudman, and Karen Hansen (1984) ‘System processing of violent juvenile offenders: An empirical assessment.’ Pp. 117–136 in: Robert A. Mathias, Paul DeMuro, and Richard S. Allinson (eds)Violent Juvenile Offenders: An Anthology. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Fishman, Mark (1978) ‘Crime waves as ideology.’Social Problems 25: 531–543. Greenberg, David F. (1979)Mathematical Criminology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Hall, Stuart, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke, Brian Roberts (1978)Policing the Crisis: Mugging, The State, and Law and Order. New York: Holmes and Meier. Hamparian, Donna M., Richard Schuster, Simon Dinitz, John P. Conrad (1978)The Violent Few: A Study of Dangerous Juvenile Offenders. Lexington: Lexington Books. Hanushek, Eric A. and John E. Jackson (1977)Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press. Harring, Sidney L. (1983)Policing a Class Society: The Experience of American Cities, 1865–1915. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Hindelang, Michael J. (1976) ‘With a little help from their friends: Group participation in reported delinquent behavior.’The British Journal of Criminology 16: 109–125. Horowitz, Ruth (1983)Honor and the American Dream: Culture and Identity in a Chicano Community. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Horowitz, Ruth and Gary Schwartz (1974) ‘Honor, normative ambiguity and gang violence.’American Sociological Review 39: 238–251. Maricopa County Juvenile Court Center (1982)Phoenix Metropolitan Area Referrals Local Police Departments 1977–1981. Phoenix: Research and Planning Division. Maricopa County Juvenile Court Center (1985)Metropolitan Area Referrals Six Local Law Enforcement Agencies for Calendar Year 1984. Phoenix: Research and Planning Division. Maxson, Cheryl L., Margaret A. Gordon and Malcolm W. Klein (1985) ‘Differences between gang and nongang homicides.’Criminology 23: 209–221. Michalowski, Raymond J. (1985)Order, Law, and Crime: An Introduction to Criminology. New York: Random House. Miller, Walter B. (1975)Violence By Youth Gangs and Youth Groups as a Crime Problem in Major American Cities. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, US Department of Justice. Washington: US Government Printing Office. Moore, Joan W., Robert Garcia, Carlos Garcia, Luis Cerda, Frank Valencia (1978)Homeboys: Gangs, Drugs, and Prison in the Barrios of Los Angeles. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Moore, Joan W. and John Long (1981)Barrio Impact of High Incarceration Rates. Los Angeles: Chicano Pinto Research Project. Moore, Joan W., Diego Vigil, and Robert Garcia (1983) ‘Residence and territoriality in Chicano gangs.’Social Problems 31: 182–194. Moore, Joan W. (1985) ‘Isolation and stigmatization of an underclass: The case of Chicano gangs in East Los Angeles.’Social Problems 33: 1–12. Morales, Armando (1972)Ando Sangrando: A Study of Mexican American — Police Conflict. La Puente, CA: Perspectiva Publications. Morash, Merry (1983) ‘Gangs, groups, and delinquency.’British Journal of Criminology 23: 309–335. Pearson, Geoffrey (1983)Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears. London: MacMillan. Pfohl, Stephen J. (1985)Images of Deviance and Social Control: A Sociological History. New York: McGraw-Hill. Phoenix Gazette (1983) “Mi barrio.” 19 January: MB1–24. Phoenix Magazine (1979) ‘Chicano response: The youth gang controversy.’ August: 152–157. Phoenix Police Department (1981)Latin Gang Member Recognition Guide for the Field Police Officer. Phoenix: Community Services Division, Juvenile Gang Reduction Unit. Reiman, Jeffrey H. (1984)The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice, second ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Schwendinger, Herman and Julia R. Siegel-Schwendinger (1985)Adolescent Subcultures and Delinquency. New York: Praeger. Spitzer, Steven (1975) ‘Toward a Marxian theory of deviance.’Social Problems 22: 638–651. Thrasher, Frederic (1927)The Gang: A Study of 1313 Gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Tucson Citizen (1979) ‘Gangs proliferate.’ 28 November. US Commission on Civil Rights (1970)Mexican Americans and the Administration of Justice in the Southwest. Washington: US Government Printing Office. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1983)1980 Census of Population and Housing Census Tracts. Washington: US Government Printing Office. US Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1976–1985)Uniform Crime Reports, 1975–1984. Washington: US Government Printing Office. Vigil, James Diego (1983) ‘Chicano gangs: One response to Mexican urban adaptation in the Los Angeles area.’Urban Anthropology 12: 45–75. Werthman, Carl and Irving Piliavin (1967) ‘Gang members and the police.’ Pp. 56–98 in: David Bordua (ed.)The Police: Six Sociological Essays. New York: Wiley. Wilkins, Leslie T. (1965)Social Deviance: Social Policy, Action, and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Yablonsky, Lewis (1959) ‘The delinquent gang as a near-group.’Social Problems 7: 108–117. Young, Jock (1979) ‘Drugs and the role of the police as amplifiers of deviancy.’ Pp. 96–108 in: Victoria L. Swigert and Ronald A. Farrell (eds)The Substance of Social Deviance. Sherman Oaks, CA: Alfred Publishing Co. Zatz, Marjorie S. (1985) ‘Los cholos: Legal processing of Chicano gang members.’Social Problems 33: 13–30.