Cheating as a dynamic marketing strategy in monopoly, cartel and duopoly
Tóm tắt
In 2015 it was discovered that Volkswagen had manipulated the exhaust emissions of its (diesel) cars. Since then, numerous other automotive car manufacturers were strongly suspected to violate against the same emission standards. This paper investigates how and why firms (monopoly, cartel and duopoly) engage in cheating, more precisely, promising attributes that are actually not part of the product. Firms make claims in order to better market their product but risk damaging their future reputation. The upshot of the paper is the stark difference between open loop and Markov perfect oligopolistic equilibrium outcomes. More precisely, the latter mitigates cheating substantially even below the levels attained by monopolies and cartels (unless consumers have a very short memory), which is contrary to the outcome in the limiting static version of the game. Therefore, revealing the true state (e.g., by mandating strict inspections) could force firms to use this information and play in Markov instead of open loop strategies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cartwright E, Menezes ML (2014) Cheating to win: dishonesty and the intensity of competition. Econ Lett 122(1):55–58
Cellini R, Lambertini L (2003) Advertising with spillover effects in a differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods. Cent Eur J Oper Res 11:409–423
Coombs WT (2010) Conceptualizing crisis communication. In: Heath RL, O’Hair HD (eds) Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge, London
Coombs WT (2015) Ongoing crisis communication: planning, managing, and responding. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Coombs WT, Holladay SJ (1996) Communication and attributions in a crisis: an experimental study in crisis communication. J Public Relat Res 8(4):279–295
Darby MR, Karni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J Law Econ 16(1):67–88
Dockner EJ, Jorgensen S, Van Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Domen F, Hawranek D (2017) Collusion between Germany’s biggest carmakers. Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-cartel-collusion-between-germany-s-biggest-carmakers-a-1159471.html. Accessed 03 Sept 2019
Dullek U, Kerschbamer R (2006) On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: the economics of credence goods. J Econ Lit 44(1):5–42
Fershtman C (1984) Goodwill and market shares in oligopoly. Economica 51:271–281
Gorzelany J (2015) Dieselgate: What VW TDI owners should know. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimgorzelany/2015/09/23/dieselgate-what-vw-tdi-owners-should-know/#1de07e1b443b. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
Gotsi M, Wilson AM (2001) Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corp Commun Int J 6(1):24–30
Haidt J (2012) The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage, New York
Haskel J, Westlake S (2017) Capitalism without capital: the rise of the intangible economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hirschmann D (2014) Optimal quality provision when reputation is subject to random inspections. Oper Res Lett 42(1):64–69
Hotten R (2015) Volkswagen: the scandal explained. BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
Kopel M, Lamantia F (2018) The persistence of social strategies under increasing competitive pressure. J Econ Dyn Control 91:71–83
Langevoort DC (2002) The organizational psychology of hyper-competition: corporate irresponsibility and the lessons of Enron. Geo Wash Law Rev 70:968
Lin-Hi N, Müller K (2013) The CSR bottom line: preventing corporate social irresponsibility. J Bus Res 66(10):1928–1936
Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J Polit Econ 82(4):729–754
Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129–142
Schwieren C, Weichselbaumer D (2010) Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment. J Econ Psychol 31(3):241–253
Shleifer A (2004) Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Am Econ Rev 94(2):414–418
Smith G, Parloff R (2016) Hoaxwagen. Fortune. http://fortune.com/inside-volkswagen-emissions-scandal/. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
Volkswagen AG (2015) Clarification moving forward: internal investigations at Volkswagen identify irregularities in CO\(_{2}\) levels. https://www.volkswagen-media-services.com/en/detailpage/-/detail/Clarification-moving-forward-internal-investigations-at-Volkswagen-identify-irregularities-in-CO2-levels/view/2857367/18108d8d101b6284fe7b29bcf415eda5?p_p_auth=7WdHl2wa. Accessed 13 Mar 2019
Volkswagen AG (2017) Annual report 2017. Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
Volkswagen AG (2018) Annual report 2018. Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
Weiner B (2013) Human motivation. Psychology Press, London