Charles Kingsley and the Theological Interpretation of Natural Selection

Journal of Bioeconomics - Tập 8 - Trang 197-218 - 2006
David M. Levy1, Sandra J. Peart2
1Public Choice Center, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
2Economics Department, Baldwin-Wallace College, Berea, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper questions the common view that Darwinian biology is a straighforward extension of classical political economy. Our analysis contrasts the economists’ classification scheme – whereby all humans were presumed natural kinds, to be equally competent for economic and political decision making – with the post-Darwinian classification scheme that developed. When the tools of political economy were imported into biology, the presumption of homogeneity of competence was denied. Charles Kingsley played a significant role in the transition from one sort of classificatory scheme to another, in the overthrow of the economists’ notion that humans are the same in their capacity for trade and moral judgment. Darwin sent Kingsley a presentation copy of Origin of Species and quoted him in the second edition as the ‘celebrated author and divine’ who had sketched a theology in which Providence used natural selection in the creation process. The economists’ doctrine that all people form a natural kind had many opponents. Biologists agreed with economists that, whatever differences existed between races of people, none put a person outside the protection of law. Other opponents, e.g., Thomas Carlyle, criticized both the economists’ premise and their conclusion regarding protection under the law. Kingsley moved from a Carlylean to a Darwinian opposition to natural kinds.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Babbage Charles. (1989). The works of Charles Babbage. New York University Press, New York Becker, Carl. 1913. Some aspects of the influence of social problems and ideas upon the study and the writing of history. American Journal of Sociology (March):641–675. Brantlinger Patrick. (2003). Dark vanishings: discourse on the extinction of primitive races, 1800–1930. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London Chadwick Owen. (1975) Charles Kingsley at Cambridge. The Historical Journal 18(June):303–325 Crook Paul. (1994). Darwinism, war and history: the debate over the biology of war from the ‘ Origin of Species’ to the first world war. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Curtis, Lewis Perry, Jr. 1971. Apes and angels: the Irishman in Victorian caricature. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. (Revised edition, 1997). Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the origin of species. A facsimile of the 1st edition. Harvard University Press, 1964. Darwin, Charles. 1860. On the origin of the species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. J. Murray, London. (Second edition, 1860). Darwin, Charles. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Volumes 21–22 of The works of Charles Darwin. P. H. Barrett & R. B. Freeman (ed.) New York University Press, Washington Square, New York, 1989 Darwin, Charles. 7 May 1879. Letter to John Fordyce. Darwin Correspondence On Line Database. 2004. http://darwin.lib.cam.ac.uk/perl/nav?pclass=calent;pkey=12041 Darwin, Charles. 1991. The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 7. F. Burkhardt & S. Smith (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Darwin, Charles. 1993. The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 8. F. Burkhardt, D. M. Porter, J. Browne & M. Richmond (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Darwin, Charles. 1994. The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 9. F. Burkhardt, D. M. Porter, J. Browne & M. Richmond (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Darwin, Charles. 1997. The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 10. F. Burkhardt, D. M. Porter, J. Harvey & J. R. Topham (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Darwin, Erasmus.] 1791. The botanic garden; a poem in two parts. London. Desmond Adrian J., James Moore. (1991). Darwin. Warner Books, New York Drescher Seymour. (2002). The mighty experiment: free labor versus slavery in british emancipation. Oxford University Press, Oxford Dupree, A. Hunter. 1963. Notes. In Darwiniana: essays and reviews pertaining to Darwin by Asa Gray. A. Hunter Dupree (ed.) The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. [Freeman, E. A.] 1864. Mr. Kingsley’s Roman and Teuton. The Saturday Review 17(9 April):446–448. Ghiselin, Michael T. 1969. The triumph of the Darwinian method. With a new preface. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1984. Ghiselin Michael.T., Janet T.Landa. (2005). The economics and bioeconomics of folk and scientific classification. Journal of Bioeconomics 7:221–238 Gould Stephen Jay. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London Gray, Asa. 1861. Natural selection not inconsistent with natural theology. Pp. 72–145 in A. H. Dupree (ed.) Darwiniana: essays and reviews pertaining to Darwin by Asa Gray. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1963. Gray, Asa. 1876. What is Darwinism? Pp. 219–232 in A. H. Dupree (ed.) Darwiniana: essays and reviews pertaining to Darwin by Asa Gray. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1963. Greg, William Rathbone. 1851. English socialism. Pp. 174–228 in W. R. Greg (ed.) Mistaken Aims and Attainable Ideals of the Artizan Class. Trηbner & Co., London, 1876. Hill, William Charles Osman. 1950. Man’s relation to the apes. Man 50(December):161–162. Hollander Samuel. (1997). The economics of Thomas Robert Malthus. University of Toronto Press, Toronto Hofstadter Richard. (1944). Social Darwinism in American thought 1860–1915. University of Pennsylvania Press/American Historical Association, Philadelphia Horsman, Reginald. 1976. Origins of racial Anglo-Saxonism in Great Britain before 1850. Journal of the History of Ideas (July–September):387–410. Hull, David L. 1971. Darwin and his critics: the reception of Darwin’s theory of evolution by the scientific community. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983. [Hunt, James] 1863. Kingsley’s Water-Babies. Anthropological Review 1(November):472–476. Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1900. Life and letters of Thomas Henry Huxley. Leonard Huxley (ed.) D. Appleton and Co., New York. Jevons W.S. (1874). The principles of science. A treatise on logic and scientific method. Macmillan, London Kemble, John Mitchell. 1849. The Saxons in England. A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Normal conquest. Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, London. [Keynes, John Maynard] 1943. Leonard Darwin. Economic Journal 53(December):438–448. Kingsley, Charles. 1860. The limits of exact science as applied to history. An inaugural lecture, delivered before the University of Cambridge. Macmillan, Cambridge, London. Kingsley Charles. (1863). Water-babies: a fairy tale for a land-baby. Macmillian, London & Cambridge Kingsley Charles. (1864). The Roman and the Teuton: a series of lectures delivered before the University of Cambridge. Macmillan, Cambridge and London Kingsley, Charles, 1871. The natural theology of the future. Macmillan’s Magazine 23(March):369–378. Kingsley, Charles. 1874. The natural theology of the future. In Westminster Sermons: With a Preface. Macmillian, London. Kingsley, Charles. 1877. His letters and memories of his life. His wife. [Francis Eliza Kingsley] (ed.) Henry S. King, London. Kottler, Malcolm Jay. 1974. Alfred Russel Wallace, the origin of man, and spiritualism. Isis 65(June):144–192. Landa Janet T., Michael T.Ghiselin. (2005). The economics and bioeconomics of classification: Introduction. Journal of Bioeconomics 7:215–220 [Leslie, T. E. C.] 1861. The individual and the crowd. Fraser’s Magazine 63(May):593–604. Levy, David M. 1968. Marxism and alienation. New Individualist Review 5(Winter):34–41. Levy, David M. 1978. Some normative aspects of the Malthusian controversy. History of Political Economy 10(Summer):271–285. Levy David.M. (2001). How the dismal science got its name: classical economics & the ur-text of racial politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Levy, David M. & Sandra J Peart. 2001/2. The secret history of the dismal science. www.econlib.org Levy, David M. & Sandra J. Peart. 2003. ‘Who are the Canters?’ the coalition of evangelical-economic egalitarians. History of Political Economy 35(2003):731–757. Levy, David M. & Sandra J. Peart. 2004a. Analytical egalitarianism, anecdotal evidence & information aggregation. Journal of Economic Methodology 11(2004):411–435. Levy David.M., Sandra J.Peart. (2004b). Sympathy and approbation in Hume and Smith: a solution to the other rational species problem. Economics and Philosophy 20:331–349 Levy, David M. & Sandra J. Peart. 2007. Inducing transparency: toward the establishment of ethical rules for econometrics. Eastern Economic Journal. Forthcoming. McCarthy Ian.Paul. (2005). Toward a phylogentic reconstruction of organizational life. Journal of Bioeconomics 7:271–307 [Malthus, Thomas R.] 1798. An essay on the principle of population as it affects the future of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPop.html. Malthus, Thomas R. 1826. An essay on the principle of population: a view of its past and present effects on human happiness; with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the evils which it occasions. Sixth edition. www.econlib.org/library/ Malthus/malPlong.html. Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1958. Darwin’s religious views. Journal of the History of Ideas 19(June): 363–378. McCloskey Deirdre. (2006). The bourgeois virtues: ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Milne-Edwards, H. 1853. Introduction a la zoologie générale. Arno Press, New York, 1981. Mivart, St. George. 1871a. On the genesis of species. D. Appleton and Company, New York. Mivart, St. George. 1871b. Ape resemblances to man. Nature 3(April 20):481. [Mivart, St. George.] 1871c. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Quarterly Review 131(July & October):47–90. Mivart, St. George. 1874. Man and apes: an exposition of structural resemblances and differences bearing upon questions of affinity and origin. D. Appleton and Co., New York. Mivart St.George. (1876). Contemporary evolution: an essay on some recent social changes. Henry S. King & Co., London Mivart, St. George. 1899. The origin of human reason. Kegan, Paul, Trench Co., London. [Müller, Max]. 1877. Preface In Charles Kingsley. The Roman and the Teuton. Macmillan Co., London. McLachlan Jean.O. (1947). The origin and early development of the Cambridge historical tripos. Cambridge Historical Journal 9:78–105 Newman, John Henry Cardinal. 1864. Apologia pro vita sua: being a history of his religious opinions. M. J. Svaglic (ed.) At the Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967. Paley, William. 1809. Natural theology; or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity.collected from the appearances of nature. 12th edition. Printed for J. Faulder London University of Michigan Humanities Text Initiative. Ann Arbor, 1998. http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/p/pd-modeng/pd-modeng-idx?type=HTML&rgn=TEI.2& byte=53049319 Parker, C. J. W. 1981. The failure of liberal racialism: the racial ideas of E. A. Freeman. The Historical Journal 24(December):825–846. Parker, Christopher. 1983. English historians and the opposition to positivism. History and Theory 22(May):120–145. Peart Sandra.J., David M.Levy. (2003). Denying homogeneity: eugenics & the making of post-classical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25:261–288 Peart Sandra.J., David M.Levy (2005a). A discipline without sympathy: from median well-being to mean well-being. Canadian Journal of Economics 38:937–954 Peart Sandra.J., David M.Levy (2005b). From ordinal to cardinal utility: Darwin and differential capacity for happiness. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64:851–880 Peart, Sandra J. & David M. Levy. 2005c. The ‘vanity of the philosopher:’ from equality to hierarchy in post-classical economics. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Peckham Morse. (1959). The origin of species by Charles Darwin: a variorum text. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia Rosenberg, Nathan. 1965. Adam Smith on the division of labour: two views or one? n.s. 32(May):127–139. Soffer, Reba N. 1970. The revolution in social thought, 1880–1914. American Historical Review (December):1938–1964. Smith, Adam. 1759. Theory of moral sentiments.. London: A. Millar. http://www.econlib.org/ library/Smith/smMS.html (6th edition 1790). Smith, Adam. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Edwin Cannan (ed.) Methuen and Co., Ltd., London, 1904. http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html Spencer Frank. (1990). Piltdown: a scientific forgery. Oxford, New York Straus, William L. Jr. 1949. The riddle of man’s ancestry. Quarterly Review of Biology 24(September):200–223. Svaglic, Martin J. 1967. Editor’s introduction. In John Henry Cardinal Newman. Apologia pro vita sua: being a history of his religious opinions. At the Clarendon Press, Oxford. Toye John. (2000). Keynes on population. Oxford University Press, New York Wallace, Elisabeth. 1954. Goldwin Smith on history. Journal of Modern History 26(September):220–232. Waterman, Anthony M. C. 1991. Revolution, economics and religion: Christian political economy, 1798–1833. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Waterman Anthony.M.C. (2004). Political economy and Christian theology since the enlightenment. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire