Những Thách Thức Trong Việc Triển Khai Hệ Thống Quản Lý Hiệu Suất và Thưởng Tại Các Tổ Chức Giáo Dục Đại Học Tại Pakistan: Nhận Thức Của Các Nhà Lãnh Đạo Hàng Đầu Trong Các Cơ Quan Quản Lý Đang Thi Hành

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Beerkens, E. (2003). Globalization and higher education research. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 128–148.

Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1993). The reforming organization. London: Routledge.

Butler, J. (2019). Learning to lead: A discussion of development programs for academic leadership capability in Australian universities. Journal of higher education policy and management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2019.1701855.

Cadez, S., Dimovski, V., & Groff, M. J. (2017). Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1455–1473.

Cantwell, B., & Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2009). Four stories: Confronting contemporary ideas about globalization and internationalization in higher education. Globalization, Societies and Education, 7(3), 289–306.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.

Christensen, T., Gornitzka, Å., & Ramirez, F. O. (Eds.). (2019). Universities as agencies: Reputation and professionalization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Røvik, K.A. (2020). Organization Theory and the Public Sector. New York: Routledge. 2nd edition.

Clark, B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184.

Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.

Degn, L. (2014). Identity constructions and sense-making in higher education – A case study of Danish higher education department heads. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881345.

Egeberg, M. (2014). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 77–87). London: Sage.

Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

Gaus, N., Yunus, M., Karim, A., & Sadia, H. (2018). The analysis of policy implementation models in higher education: The case study of Indonesia. Policy Studies, 40(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1539224.

González, C., Liu, Y., & Shu, X. (2012). The faculty promotion and merit system in China and the United States: The cases of Wuhan University and the University of California. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.13.12.

Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P., Olsen, J. P., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Europe of knowledge: Search for a new pact. In L. Zucker (Ed.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 181–214). Dordrecht: Springer.

Harun, H., Wardhaningtyas, S., Khan, H. Z., An, Y., & Masdar, R. (2019). Understanding the institutional challenges and impacts of higher education reforms in Indonesia. Public Money & Management, 40(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1627063.

Henningsson, M., Jörnesten, A., & Geschwind, L. (2018). Translating tenure track into Swedish: Tensions when implementing an academic career system. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1215–1226.

Huang, Y., Pang, S., & Yu, S. (2016). Academic identities and university faculty responses to new managerialist reforms: Experiences from China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1157860.

Jeanes, E., Loacker, B., & Śliwa, M. (2018). Complexities, challenges and implications of collaborative work within a regime of performance measurement: The case of management and organization studies. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1453793.

Khan, T. A., & Nasira, J. (2011). Tenure-track system in higher education institutions of Pakistan: Prospects and challenges. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(9), 605–621.

Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

Kohtamäki, V. (2018). Academic leadership and university reform-guided management changes in Finland. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2018.1553499.

Krücken, G. (2014). Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: A research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1439–1450.

Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (Eds.). (2014). The problem-solving capacity of the modern state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ma, L., & Christensen, T. (2018). Same bed, different dreams? Structural factors and leadership characteristics of central government agency reform in China. International Public Management Journal, 22(4), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1450311.

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. A. (2010). Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: The Free Press.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life. What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–297.

Mohammadi, H., & Mirzamohammadi, M. H. (2019). New public management (NPM) in the Iranian higher education; a moral analysis. Ethics and Education, 15(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1700453.

Olsen, J. P. (2009). Democratic government, institutional autonomy and the dynamics of change. Western European Politics, 32(3), 439–365.

Paradeise, C., Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Goastellec, G., Michelsen, S., & Reale, E. (2009). Reform policies and change processes in Europe. In J. Huisman (Ed.), International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination (pp. 114–132). New York: Routledge.

Park, S., Sine, W. D., & Tolbert, P. S. (2011). Professions, organizations, and institutions: Tenure Systems in Colleges and Universities. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 340–371.

Pashiardis, P., & Brauckmann, S. (2018). New public Management in Education: A call for the Edupreneurial leader? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(3), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1475575.

Patashnik, E. M. (2014). Reforms at risk. What happens after major policy changes are enacted? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Pietilä, M. (2015). Tenure track career system as a strategic instrument for academic leaders. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1046466.

Pietilä, M. (2017). Incentivising academics: Experiences and expectations of the tenure track in Finland. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405250.

Pollitt, C., and G.Bouckaert. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity. Oxford: Oxford University press. 4th edition.

Ramirez, F. O., & Christensen, T. (2013). The formalization of the university: Rules, roots, and routes. Higher Education, 65(6), 695–708.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.

Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Söderlind, J., & Geschwind, L. (2019). Making sense of academic work: The influence of performance measurement in Swedish universities. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1564354.

Tierney, W. G. (2014). Higher education research, policy, and the challenges of reform. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1417–1427.

Tight, M. (2007). Bridging the divide: A comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America. Higher Education, 53(2), 235–253.

Yan, L., Jessica, L., & Sun, Y. (2013). Young faculty job perceptions in the midst of Chinese higher education reform: The case of Zhejiang University. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(3), 273–294.