Cellulase production by six Trichoderma spp. fermented on medicinal plant processings
Tóm tắt
Capabilities of cellulase production, using delignified bioprocessings of medicinal and aromatic plants, viz. citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus) and Artemisia annua (known as marc of Artemisia) and garden waste (chiefly containing Cynodon dactylon), by the six species of Trichoderma were comparatively evaluated. Among the members of Trichoderma studied, T. citrinoviride was found to be the most efficient producer of cellulases along with a high level of β- glucosidase (produced 102.4 IU g−1 on marc of Artemisia; 101.33 IU g−1 on garden waste; 81.86 IU g−1 on distillation waste of citronella and 94.77 IU g−1 on pure cellulose). Although T. virens was noticed to be the minimal enzyme producer fungus, it interestingly could not produce complete cellulase enzyme complex on any test waste or pure cellulose, except on marc of Artemisia, where it produced all three enzymes of the complex. Immediate reduction in pH was also noticed during fermentation in the case of pure polymer (cellulose) by all tested fungi, while it was delayed with delignified agrowastes. The pH profile varied with the substrate used as well as with individual species of Trichoderma. On the other hand, no alteration in pH with any species of Trichoderma was noticed when grown on marc of A. annua, which might be due to the buffering capacity of this marc.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Behrendt CJ, Blanchette RA, Akhtar M, Enebak S, Iverson S, Williams D (2000) Biomechanical pulping with Phlebiopsis gigantea reduced energy consumption and increased paper strength. Tappi J 83:65
Blanchette RA, Behrendt CD, Williams D, Iverson S, Akhtar M, Enebak SA (1998) A new approach to effective biopulping: treating logs with Phlebiopsis gigantea, 7th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry Hyatt Regency Hotel, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp A51–A54
Somogyi N (1945) A new reagent for determining sugars. J Biol Chem 160:61–68
Domingues FC, Queiroz JA, Cabral JMC, Fonseca LP (2000) The influence of culture conditions on mycelial structure and cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:394–401. doi:10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00166-0
Gadgil NJ, Daginawala HF, Chakrabarti T, Khanna P (1995) Enhanced cellulase production by a mutant of Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:942–946. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(94)00131-A
Latifian M, Esfahani ZH, Barzegar M (2007) Evaluation of culture conditions for cellulase production by two Trichoderma reesei mutants under solid-state fermentation conditions. Bioresour Technol 98:3634–3637. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.019
Mandels M, Weber J, Parizek R (1971) Enhanced cellulase production by a mutant of Trichoderma viride. Appl Microbiol 21:152–154
Wen Z, Liao W, Chen S (2005) Production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei from dairy manure. Bioresour Technol 96:491–499. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.021
Duennas R, Tengerdy RP, Gutierrez-Corea M (1995) Cellulase production by mixed fungi in solid substrate fermentation of bagasse. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 11:333–337. doi:10.1007/BF00367112
Kotchoni OS, Shonukan OO, Gachomo WE (2003) Bacillus pumilus BpCRI 6, a promising candidate for cellulase production under conditions of catabolite repression. Afr J Biotechnol 2:140–146
Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506–577. doi:10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
Mandels M, Weber J (1969) The production of cellulases. Adv Chem Ser 95:391–414
Ghosh VK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268. doi:10.1351/pac198759020257
Kubicek CP (1982) β-Glucosidase excretion by Trichoderma pseudokoningii correlation with cell wall bound β–1–3 -glucanase activities. Arch Microbiol 132:349–354. doi:10.1007/BF00413388
Pratt JE, Niemi M, Sierota ZH (2000) Comparison of three products based on Phlebiopsis Gigantea for the control of Heterobasidion annosum in Europe. Biocontrol Sci Technol 10:467–477. doi:10.1080/09583150050115052
Lowry OH, Rosenburgh NJ, Farr AI, Randell RJ (1951) Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J Biochem 193:265–271
Bhatia Y, Mishra S, Bisaria VS (2002) Microbial β-Glucosidases: cloning, properties, and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 22:375–407. doi:10.1080/07388550290789568
Henriksson G, Johansson G, Pettersson G (2000) A critical review of cellobiose dehydrogenases. J Biotechnol 78:93–113. doi:10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00206-6
Bao W, Lymar E, Renganathan V (1994) Optimization of cellobiose dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase production by cellulose-degrading cultures of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 42:642−646. Hist Arch. doi:10.1007/BF00173933
Ludwig R, Haltrich D (2003) Optimisation of cellobiose dehydrogenase production by the fungus Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:32–39
Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR (2006) Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452–481. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.10.002