Cautionary tale of using 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values in identification of human-associated bacterial species

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology - Tập 65 Số Pt_6 - Trang 1929-1934 - 2015
Morgane Rossi-Tamisier1, Samia Benamar1, Didier Raoult1, Pierre‐Edouard Fournier1
1Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, UM 63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée-Infection, Faculté de médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France

Tóm tắt

Modern bacterial taxonomy is based on a polyphasic approach that combines phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, including 16S rRNA sequence similarity. However, the 95 % (for genus) and 98.7 % (for species) sequence similarity thresholds that are currently recommended to classify bacterial isolates were defined by comparison of a limited number of bacterial species, and may not apply to many genera that contain human-associated species. For each of 158 bacterial genera containing human-associated species, we computed pairwise sequence similarities between all species that have names with standing in nomenclature and then analysed the results, considering as abnormal any similarity value lower than 95 % or greater than 98.7 %. Many of the current bacterial species with validly published names do not respect the 95 and 98.7 % thresholds, with 57.1 % of species exhibiting 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity rates ≥98.7 %, and 60.1 % of genera containing species exhibiting a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity rate <95 %. In only 17 of the 158 genera studied (10.8 %), all species respected the 95 and 98.7 % thresholds. As we need powerful and reliable taxonomical tools, and as potential new tools such as pan-genomics have not yet been fully evaluated for taxonomic purposes, we propose to use as thresholds, genus by genus, the minimum and maximum similarity values observed among species.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Acinas, 2004, Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons, J Bacteriol, 186, 2629, 10.1128/JB.186.9.2629-2635.2004

Alexander, 2002, Phylogeny of green sulfur bacteria on the basis of gene sequences of 16S rRNA and of the Fenna-Matthews-Olson protein, Arch Microbiol, 178, 131, 10.1007/s00203-002-0432-4

Altschul, 1990, Basic local alignment search tool, J Mol Biol, 215, 403, 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

Benson, 2013, GenBank, Nucleic Acids Res, 41, D36, 10.1093/nar/gks1195

Bosshard, 2006, 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory, J Clin Microbiol, 44, 1359, 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1359-1366.2006

Brenner, 1969, Batch procedure for thermal elution of DNA from hydroxyapatite, Anal Biochem, 28, 447, 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90199-7

Chenna, 2003, Multiple sequence alignment with the clustal series of programs, Nucleic Acids Res, 31, 3497, 10.1093/nar/gkg500

Clarridge, 2004, Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases, Clin Microbiol Rev, 17, 840, 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004

DeSantis, 2006, Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with arb, Appl Environ Microbiol, 72, 5069, 10.1128/AEM.03006-05

Fournier, 2009, Current knowledge on phylogeny and taxonomy of Rickettsia spp., Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1166, 1, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04528.x

Fox, 1977, Classification of methanogenic bacteria by 16S ribosomal RNA characterization, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 74, 4537, 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4537

Fox, 1992, How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 42, 166, 10.1099/00207713-42-1-166

Goujon, 2010, A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI, Nucleic Acids Res, 38, W695, 10.1093/nar/gkq313

Hugenholtz, 1998, Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity, J Bacteriol, 180, 4765, 10.1128/JB.180.18.4765-4774.1998

Huse, 2008, Exploring microbial diversity and taxonomy using SSU rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing, PLoS Genet, 4, e1000255, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000255

Janda, 2007, 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls, J Clin Microbiol, 45, 2761, 10.1128/JCM.01228-07

Johnson, 1991, DNA reassociation experiments, Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, 21

Kim, 2012, Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 62, 716, 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0

Ludwig, 2001, Overview: a phylogenetic backbone and taxonomic framework for prokaryotic systematics, Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, 49, 10.1007/978-0-387-21609-6_8

Ludwig, 2004, arb: a software environment for sequence data, Nucleic Acids Res, 32, 1363, 10.1093/nar/gkh293

Mignard, 2006, 16S rRNA sequencing in routine bacterial identification: a 30-month experiment, J Microbiol Methods, 67, 574, 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.05.009

Morgulis, 2008, Database indexing for production Megablast searches, Bioinformatics, 24, 1757, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322

Olsen, 1995, Rejection of Clostridium putrificum and conservation of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes. Request for an Opinion, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 45, 414, 10.1099/00207713-45-2-414

Parte, 2014, LPSN–list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature, Nucleic Acids Res, 42, D613, 10.1093/nar/gkt1111

Pei, 2010, Diversity of 16S rRNA genes within individual prokaryotic genomes, Appl Environ Microbiol, 76, 3886, 10.1128/AEM.02953-09

Quast, 2013, The silva ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Res, 41, D590, 10.1093/nar/gks1219

Rosselló-Mora, 2003, Opinion: the species problem, can we achieve a universal concept?, Syst Appl Microbiol, 26, 323, 10.1078/072320203322497347

Roth, 2003, Phylogeny of the genus Nocardia based on reassessed 16S rRNA gene sequences reveals underspeciation and division of strains classified as Nocardia asteroides into three established species and two unnamed taxons, J Clin Microbiol, 41, 851, 10.1128/JCM.41.2.851-856.2003

Sentausa, 2013, Advantages and limitations of genomics in prokaryotic taxonomy, Clin Microbiol Infect, 19, 790, 10.1111/1469-0691.12181

Stackebrandt, 2006, Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards, Microbiol Today, 33, 152

Stackebrandt, 1994, Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 44, 846, 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846

Stackebrandt, 2002, Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52, 1043

Tamura, 2011, mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods, Mol Biol Evol, 28, 2731, 10.1093/molbev/msr121

Tindall, 2010, Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 60, 249, 10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0

Vandamme, 1996, Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics, Microbiol Rev, 60, 407, 10.1128/MMBR.60.2.407-438.1996

Wang, 1997, The actinomycete Thermobispora bispora contains two distinct types of transcriptionally active 16S rRNA genes, J Bacteriol, 179, 3270, 10.1128/JB.179.10.3270-3276.1997