Causal Inference: A Missing Data Perspective

Statistical Science - Tập 33 Số 2 - 2018

Peng Ding^1,2, Fan Li²

¹Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, 122 Old Chemistry Bldg, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

²Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, 425 Evans Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Ann. Statist. 6 34–58.

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 444–455.

Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (1997). Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance. Ann. Statist. 25 305–327.

Rubin, D. B. (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Stat. Med. 26 20–36.

Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 58 267–288.

Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63 581–592.

Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika 87 706–710.

Mealli, F. and Rubin, D. B. (2015). Clarifying missing at random and related definitions, and implications when coupled with exchangeability. Biometrika 102 995–1000.

Ding, P., Geng, Z., Yan, W. and Zhou, X.-H. (2011). Identifiability and estimation of causal effects by principal stratification with outcomes truncated by death. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 1578–1591.

Frumento, P., Mealli, F., Pacini, B. and Rubin, D. B. (2012). Evaluating the effect of training on wages in the presence of noncompliance, nonemployment, and missing outcome data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107 450–466.

Frumento, P., Mealli, F., Pacini, B. and Rubin, D. B. (2016). The fragility of standard inferential approaches in principal stratification models relative to direct likelihood approaches. Stat. Anal. Data Min. 9 58–70.

Manski, C. F. (1990). Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 80 319–323.

Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 4 87–94.

Crump, R. K., Hotz, V. J., Imbens, G. W. and Mitnik, O. A. (2009). Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96 187–199.

Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Polit. Anal. 20 25–46.

Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 808–840.

Zubizarreta, J. R. (2015). Stable weights that balance covariates for estimation with incomplete outcome data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 110 910–922.

Ding, P. and VanderWeele, T. J. (2016). Sensitivity analysis without assumptions. Epidemiology 27 368–377.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (1987). Sensitivity analysis for certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika 74 13–26.

Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983a). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 45 212–218.

Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983b). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 41–55.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002a). Covariance adjustment in randomized experiments and observational studies. Statist. Sci. 17 286–327.

Lin, W. (2013). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique. Ann. Appl. Stat. 7 295–318.

Ding, P. and Dasgupta, T. (2016). A potential tale of two-by-two tables from completely randomized experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 157–168.

Grilli, L. and Mealli, F. (2008). Nonparametric bounds on the causal effect of university studies on job opportunities using principal stratification. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 33 111–130.

Ichino, A., Mealli, F. and Nannicini, T. (2008). From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? J. Appl. Econometrics 23 305–327.

Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74 235–267.

Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W. and Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71 1161–1189.

Imai, K. and Ratkovic, M. (2014). Covariate balancing propensity score. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 76 243–263.

Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 4–29.

Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79 516–524.

Bang, H. and Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 61 962–972.

Cheng, J. and Small, D. S. (2006). Bounds on causal effects in three-arm trials with non-compliance. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 68 815–836.

Ding, P. and Geng, Z. (2014). Identifiability of subgroup causal effects in randomized experiments with nonignorable missing covariates. Stat. Med. 33 1121–1133.

Mattei, A., Mealli, F. and Pacini, B. (2014). Identification of causal effects in the presence of nonignorable missing outcome values. Biometrics 70 278–288.

Seaman, S., Galati, J., Jackson, D. and Carlin, J. (2013). What is meant by “missing at random”? Statist. Sci. 28 257–268.

Yang, F. and Small, D. S. (2016). Using post-outcome measurement information in censoring-by-death problems. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 78 299–318.

Ding, P., Feller, A. and Miratrix, L. (2016). Randomization inference for treatment effect variation. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 78 655–671.

Li, X. and Ding, P. (2017). General forms of finite population central limit theorems with applications to causal inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 112 1759–1769.

Neyman, J. (1935). Statistical problems in agricultural experimentation. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc. 2 107–180.

Nolen, T. L. and Hudgens, M. G. (2011). Randomization-based inference within principal strata. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 581–593.

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 66 688–701.

Meng, X.-L. (1994). Posterior predictive $p$-values. Ann. Statist. 22 1142–1160.

Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A. and Zhao, L. P. (1995). Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 106–121.

Li, F., Mattei, A. and Mealli, F. (2015). Evaluating the causal effect of university grants on student dropout: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design using principal stratification. Ann. Appl. Stat. 9 1906–1931.

Lunceford, J. K. and Davidian, M. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Stat. Med. 23 2937–2960.

Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 322–331.

Imbens, G. W. (2003). Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 126–132.

Mattei, A. and Mealli, F. (2011). Augmented designs to assess principal strata direct effects. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 73 729–752.

Hahn, J. (1998). On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 66 315–331.

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C. (2014). Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81 608–650.

White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 817–838.

Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 153–161.

Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L. and Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion). Statist. Sinica 6 733–807.

Cochran, W. G. (1957). Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics 13 261–281.

Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M. and Lu, X. (2008). Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: A principled yet flexible approach. Stat. Med. 27 4658–4677.

Rubin, D. B. (1980). Comment on “Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test” by D. Basu. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75 591–593.

Schwartz, S., Li, F. and Reiter, J. P. (2012). Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in principal stratification settings with binary variables. Stat. Med. 31 949–962.

Chen, H., Geng, Z. and Zhou, X.-H. (2009). Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data. Biometrics 65 675–682.

Newey, W. K. (1997). Convergence rates and asymptotic normality for series estimators. J. Econometrics 79 147–168.

Robins, J. M. and Ritov, Y. (1997). Toward a curse of dimensionality appropriate (CODA) asymptotic theory for semi-parametric models. Stat. Med. 16 285–319.

Chung, E. and Romano, J. P. (2013). Exact and asymptotically robust permutation tests. Ann. Statist. 41 484–507.

Hoeffding, W. (1952). The large-sample power of tests based on permutations of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23 169–192.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Design of Observational Studies. Springer, New York.

Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002b). Observational Studies, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.

Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

Van Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible Imputation of Missing Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments, 1st ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

Bickel, P. J. and Doksum, K. A. (2015). Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics, Volume I, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Chapin, F. S. (1947). Experimental Designs in Sociological Research. Harper, New York.

Cochran, W. G. (1953). Sampling Techniques, 1st ed. Wiley, New York.

Cochran, W. G. (2007). Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian Data Analysis, 3nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

Gustafson, P. (2015). Bayesian Inference for Partially Identified Models: Exploring the Limits of Limited Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Hájek, J. (1971). Comment on a paper by D. Basu. In Foundations of Statistical Inference (V. P. Godambe and D. A. Sprott, eds.) 236. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Toronto.

Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. 73–84. Wiley, Chichester.

Lindley, D. V. (1972). Bayesian Statistics: A Review. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.

Little, R. J. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.

Qin, J. (2017). Biased Sampling, Over-Identified Parameter Problems and Beyond. Springer, Singapore.

Ridgeway, G., McCaffrey, D., Morral, A., Griffin, B. A. and Burgette, L. (2017). twang: Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups. R package version 1.5.

Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A. and Scharfstein, D. O. (2000). Sensitivity analysis for selection bias and unmeasured confounding in missing data and causal inference models. In Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials 1–94. Springer, New York.

Rubin, D. B. (1975). Bayesian inference for causality: The role of randomization. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association 233–239.

Rubin, D. B. (2006b). Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

van der Laan, M. J. and Rose, S. (2011). Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data. Springer, New York.

Horvitz, D. and Thompson, D. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 47 663–685.

Kang, J. D. and Schafer, J. L. (2007). Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statist. Sci. 22 523–539.

Li, F., Baccini, M., Mealli, F., Zell, E. R., Frangakis, C. E. and Rubin, D. B. (2014). Multiple imputation by ordered monotone blocks with application to the anthrax vaccine research program. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 23 877–892.

Imbens, G. W. and Angrist, J. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62 467–476.

Fan, Y. and Park, S. S. (2010). Sharp bounds on the distribution of treatment effects and their statistical inference. Econometric Theory 26 931–951.

Liublinska, V. and Rubin, D. B. (2014). Sensitivity analysis for a partially missing binary outcome in a two-arm randomized clinical trial. Stat. Med. 33 4170–4185.

Murray, J. S. and Reiter, J. P. (2016). Multiple imputation of missing categorical and continuous values via Bayesian mixture models with local dependence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 1466–1479.

Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. (2011). Bias corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29 1–11.

Andrews, D. W. (2000). Inconsistency of the bootstrap when a parameter is on the boundary of the parameter space. Econometrica 68 399–405.

Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W. (2015). Machine learning methods for estimating heterogeneous causal effects. Available at <a href="arXiv:1504.01132">arXiv:1504.01132</a>.

Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. and Wager, S. (2018). Approximate residual balancing: De-biased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. To appear. Available at <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07125">https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07125</a>.

Athey, S., Imbens, G., Pham, T. and Wager, S. (2017). Estimating average treatment effects: Supplementary analyses and remaining challenges. Am. Econ. Rev. 107 278–281.

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Fernández-Val, I. and Hansen, C. (2017). Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data. Econometrica 85 233–298.

Bloniarz, A., Liu, H., Zhang, C.-H., Sekhon, J. S. and Yu, B. (2016). Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 7383–7390.

Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P. and Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. J. Stat. Softw. 76 1–32.

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W. and Robins, J. (2016). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and causal parameters. Preprint. Available at <a href="arXiv:1608.00060">arXiv:1608.00060</a>.

Chib, S. and Jacobi, L. (2016). Bayesian fuzzy regression discontinuity analysis and returns to compulsory schooling. J. Appl. Econometrics 31 1026–1047.

Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. et al. (1959). Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22 173–203.

Dawid, A. P. (2000). Causal inference without counterfactuals. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95 407–424.

Dawid, A. P. Musio, M. and Murtas, R. (2017). The probability of causation. Law, Probability and Risk 16 163–179.

Dempster, A., Laird, N. and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 39 1–38.

Ding, P. (2014). Three occurrences of the hyperbolic-secant distribution. Amer. Statist. 68 32–35.

Ding, P. and Lu, J. (2017). Principal stratification analysis using principal scores. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 79 757–777.

Ding, W. and Song, P. X.-K. (2016). EM algorithm in Gaussian copula with missing data. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 101 1–11.

Elliott, M., Raghunathan, T. and Li, Y. (2010). Bayesian inference for causal mediation effects using principal stratification with dichotomous mediators and outcomes. Biostatistics 11 353–372.

Fan, Y., Guerre, E. and Zhu, D. (2017). Partial identification of functionals of the joint distribution of “potential outcomes”. J. Econometrics 197 42–59.

Feller, A., Greif, E., Miratrix, L. and Pillai, N. (2016). Principal stratification in the twilight zone: Weakly separated components in finite mixture models. Preprint. Available at <a href="arXiv:1602.06595">arXiv:1602.06595</a>.

Firth, D. and Bennett, K. E. (1998). Robust models in probability sampling. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 60 3–21.

Frangakis, C. and Rubin, D. B. (1999). Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 86 365–378.

Frangakis, C. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58 21–29.

Gallop, R., Small, D., Lin, J., Elliot, M., Joffe, M. and Have, T. T. (2009). Mediation analysis with principal stratification. Stat. Med. 28 1108–1130.

Gelfand, A. and Smith, A. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85 398–409.

Gilbert, P. and Hudgens, M. (2008). Evaluating candidate principal surrogate endpoints. Biometrics 64 1146–1154.

Graham, B. S., de Xavier Pinto, C. C. and Egel, D. (2012). Inverse probability tilting for moment condition models with missing data. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79 1053–1079.

Gustafson, P. (2009). What are the limits of posterior distributions arising from nonidentified models, and why should we care? J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104 1682–1695.

Heckman, J., Lopes, H. and Piatek, R. (2014). Treatment effects: A Bayesian perspective. Econometric Rev. 33 36–67.

Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. and Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J. Stat. Softw. 42 1–28.

Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81 945–970.

Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. and Probability 1 221–233. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Imai, K. (2008). Sharp bounds on the causal effects in randomized experiments with “truncation-by-death”. Statist. Probab. Lett. 78 144–149.

Imai, K. and van Dyk, D. (2004). Causal treatment with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99 854–866.

Li, F., Morgan, K. and Zaslavsky, A. (2018). Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. To appear. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1260466">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1260466</a>.

Little, R. J. (1988). Missing-data adjustments in large surveys. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 6 287–296.

Little, R. and An, H. (2004). Robust likelihood-based analysis of multivariate data with missing values. Statist. Sinica 14 949–968.

Lu, J., Ding, P. and Dasgupta, T. (2015). Treatment effects on ordinal outcomes: Causal estimands and sharp bounds. Preprint. Available at <a href="arXiv:1507.01542">arXiv:1507.01542</a>.

Mealli, F., Imbens, G. W., Ferro, S. and Biggeri, A. (2004). Analyzing a randomized trial on breast self-examination with noncompliance and missing outcomes. Biostatistics 5 207–222.

Mebane, W. R. Jr and Poast, P. (2013). Causal inference without ignorability: Identification with nonrandom assignment and missing treatment data. Polit. Anal. 21 233–251.

Mercatanti, A. (2004). Analyzing a randomized experiment with imperfect compliance and ignorable conditions for missing data: Theoretical and computational issues. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 46 493–509.

Mercatanti, A. and Li, F. (2014). Do debit cards increase household spending? Evidence from a semiparametric causal analysis of a survey. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 2405–2508.

Mercatanti, A. and Li, F. (2017). Do debit cards decrease cash demand? Causal inference and sensitivity analysis using principal stratification. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. 66 759–776.

Miratrix, L. W., Sekhon, J. S. and Yu, B. (2013). Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 75 369–396.

Mitra, R. and Reiter, J. P. (2011). Estimating propensity scores with missing covariate data using general location mixture models. Stat. Med. 30 627–641.

Mitra, R. and Reiter, J. P. (2016). A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 25 188–204.

Molinari, F. (2010). Missing treatments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 28 82–95.

Neyman, J. (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Statist. Sci. 5 465–472.

Richardson, T. S., Evans, R. J. and Robins, J. M. (2010). Transparent parameterizations of models for potential outcomes. In Bayesian Statistics 9 569–610. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

Robins, J. M. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods—Application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Modelling 7 1393–1512.

Robins, J. M., van der Vaart, A. and Ventura, V. (2000). Asymptotic distribution of $p$ values in composite null models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95 1143–1156.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984a). Conditional permutation tests and the propensity score in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79 565–574.

Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984b). The consquences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 147 656–666.

Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to a treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 2 1–26.

Rubin, D. B. (1979). Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74 318–324.

Rubin, D. B. (1984). Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applies statistician. Ann. Statist. 12 1151–1172.

Rubin, D. B. (1998). More powerful randomization-based $p$-values in double-blind trials with non-compliance. Stat. Med. 17 371–385.

Rubin, D. B. (2006a). Causal inference through potential outcomes and principal stratification: Application to studies with “censoring” due to death. Statist. Sci. 91 299–321.

Scharfstein, D., Rotnitzky, A. and Robins, J. M. (1999). Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semiparametric nonresponse models (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94 1096–1146.

Sekhon, J. S. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 42 1–52.

Stuart, E. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statist. Sci. 25 1–21.

Tanner, M. and Wong, W. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 528–540.

Tukey, J. W. (1993). Tightening the clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 14 266–285.

VanderWeele, T. (2008). Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects. Statist. Probab. Lett. 78 2957–2962.

Wager, S., Du, W., Taylor, J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (2016). High-dimensional regression adjustments in randomized experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 12673–12678.

Yang, S. and Ding, P. (2018). Asymptotic causal inference with observational studies trimmed by the estimated propensity scores. Biometrika. To appear. Available at <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07125">https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07125</a>.

Yang, S., Wang, L. and Ding, P. (2017). Nonparametric identification of causal effects with confounders subject to instrumental missingness. Preprint. Available at <a href="arXiv:1702.03951">arXiv:1702.03951</a>.

Zhang, G. and Little, R. J. (2009). Extensions of the penalized spline of propensity prediction method of imputation. Biometrics 65 911–918.

Zhang, J. and Rubin, D. B. (2003). Estimation of causal effects via principal stratification when some outcomes are truncated by “death”. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 28 353–358.

Zhang, J., Rubin, D. B. and Mealli, F. (2009). Likelihood-based analysis of the causal effects of job-training programs using principal stratification. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104 166–176.

Zhang, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, B., Tang, L. and Zhang, J. (2016). Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 25 2053–2066.

Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Li, Z. and Zhang, J. (2015). Coarsened propensity scores and hybrid estimators for missing data and causal inference. Int. Stat. Rev. 83 449–471.

Zigler, C. and Belin, T. (2012). A Bayesian approach to improved estimation of causal effect predictiveness for a principal surrogate endpoint. Biometrics 68 922–932.

Scholar Hub - Công cụ hỗ trợ trích dẫn và phân tích khoa học Việt Nam

Về chúng tôi

Scholar Hub là công cụ hỗ trợ trích dẫn và phân tích các bài báo, công bố khoa học Việt Nam. Công cụ trợ giúp người nghiên cứu, tạp chí, đơn vị nghiên cứu tra cứu, phân tích và thống kê dữ liệu nghiên cứu khoa học tại Việt Nam và quốc tế.
ScholarHub KHÔNG đăng thông tin tổng hợp, KHÔNG đăng lại nội dung từ các trang báo chí Việt Nam hoặc trang thông tin điện tử khác tại Việt Nam.

Thông tin, cập nhật

Đăng ký Tạp chí tham gia vào Scholar Hub

Phản hồi ý kiến về Scholar Hub

Bài viết, nội dung cập nhật

Chủ đề khoa học

Website liên kết

Phần mềm kiểm tra trùng lặp Kiểm Tra Tài Liệu

Phần mềm xuất bản tạp chí điện tử VOJS

Công cụ kiểm tra chính tả và thể thức Viver

Nền tảng trắc nghiệm và đề thi đa lĩnh vực LetQA