Case Puijo—Evaluation of a participatory urban forest planning process

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 45 - Trang 13-23 - 2014
Annika Kangas1, Juuso Heikkilä2, Minna Malmivaara-Lämsä3, Irja Löfström4
1Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 00014, Finland
2Pirkanmaan Metsänhoitoyhdistys, P.O. Box 39, 39101 Hämeenkyrö, Finland
33 Abbey Place, Eynsham, Witney, Oxfordshire OX29 4HS, UK
4METLA/Vantaa Unit, P.O. Box 18, 01301 Vantaa, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barry, 1999, Seeking sustainability discourses with Q-methodology, Ecol. Econ., 28, 337, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00053-6 Booth, 2011, Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: a case study of British Columbia communities, Land Use Policy, 28, 898, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.03.005 Buchy, 2000, Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review, For. Policy and Econ., 1, 15, 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00006-X Chess, 1999, Public participation and the environment: do we know what works?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 2685, 10.1021/es980500g Elsasser, 2007, Do “stakeholders” represent citizen interests? An empirical inquiry into assessments of policy aims in the National Forest programme for Germany, For. Policy Econ., 9, 1018, 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.10.002 Gamper, 2007, On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis, Ecol. Econ., 62, 298, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.010 Germain, 2001, Public perceptions of the USDA Forest Service public participation process, For. Policy Econ., 3, 113, 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00065-X Hamberg, 2009, Monimuotoisuuden ja metsän eri käyttömuotojen yhteensovittaminen kuntien virkistysmetsissä ja valtion retkeilyalueilla Hamberg, 2012 Heberlein, 1976, Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement: the hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop and the quasi-experiment, Nat. Resour. J., 16, 197 International Labour Office, 2000 Janse, 2007, Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry—experiences from the Neighborhood project, Urban For. Urban Green., 6, 23, 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.09.005 Janssen, 2001, On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands, J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., 10, 101, 10.1002/mcda.293 Kajanus, 2009 Kangas, 2010, Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes, For. Policy Econ., 12, 213, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.006 Khadka, 2013, Problem structuring in participatory forest planning, For. Policy Econ., 26, 1, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.008 Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova, 2006, Assessment of an iterative process: the double spiral of re-designing participation, For. Policy Econ., 8, 529, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.010 Krott, 2013, Actor-centered power: the driving force in decentralised community based forest governance, For. Policy Econ., 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012 Löfström, 2007, Kuntien virkistys-ja ulkoilumetsät, 234 Löfström, 2008 McKeown, 1988 Menzel, 2012, Decision support systems in forest management—requirements from a participatory planning perspective, Eur. J. For. Res., 131, 1367, 10.1007/s10342-012-0604-y Mikkola, 2008, Kuntametsien suunnittelun tiekartta-hankkeen loppuraportti Mustajoki, 2011, Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 1550, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007 Muther, 2011, 100years of project planning, Ind. Eng., 43, 40 PQmethod manual Rantanen, 2009, The SoftGIS approach to local knowledge, J. Environ. Manag., 90, 1981, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025 Renn, 1993, Public participation in decision making: a three step procedure, Policy. Sci., 26, 189, 10.1007/BF00999716 Saarikoski, 2010, Public participation in practice—assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in Northern Finland, For. Policy Econ., 12, 349, 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.006 Sipilä, 2005, Evaluation of collaborative urban forest planning in Helsinki, Finland, Urban For. Urban Green., 4, 1, 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.06.002 Smith, 2001, Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making, Soc. Nat. Resour., 14, 239, 10.1080/089419201750111056 Stephenson, 1953 Tuler, 1999, Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process, Soc. Nat. Resour., 12, 437, 10.1080/089419299279524 Vainio, 2012, Forest owners and power: a Foucaldian study on Finnish forest policy, For. Policy Econ., 21, 118, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.008 Visser, 2007, The Irish agri-environment: how turlough users and non-users view converging EU agendas of Natura 2000 and CAP, Land Use Policy, 24, 362, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.04.004 Walter, 1997, Images of success: how Illinois farmers define the successful farmer, Rural. Sociol. Soc., 62, 48, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1997.tb00644.x Webler, 2006, Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: combined results from 10 case studies, Policy Stud. J., 34, 699, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00198.x Webler, 2001, What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public, Environ. Manag., 27, 435, 10.1007/s002670010160 Zografos, 2007, Rurality discourses and the role of the social enterprise in regenerating rural Scotland, J. Rural. Stud., 23, 38, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.04.002