Cartelization, Cartel Breakdown, and Price Behavior: Evidence from the German Cement Industry
Tóm tắt
We use a unique dataset of about 340,000 market transactions from 36 smaller and larger customers of German cement producers to study the price behavior before and after the breakdown of a German cement cartel. We find that, first, while the cartel agreement was active, cartel members set higher list prices than non-cartel members; however, larger rebates granted by the cartel members led to similar transaction prices. Second, after the cartel breakdown, both cartel- and non-cartel members reduced transaction prices to a far larger extent than list prices. We build on these results and discuss implications for competition policy.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen J, Clark R, Houde J-F (2014) Price dispersion in mortgage markets. J Ind Econ 62(3):377–416
Asker J (2010) A study of the internal organization of a bidding cartel. Am Econ Rev 100:724–762
Beckert W, Smith H, Takahashi Y (2015) Competitive price discrimination in a spatially differentiated intermediate goods market. University of London, London, Working Paper
Blair R, Maurer V (1982) Umbrella pricing and antitrust standing: an economic analysis. Utah Law Rev 763-796
Blair R, Piette Durrance C (2009) Umbrella pricing: antitrust injury and standing, in D. Collins (ed.), issues in competition law and policy. Am Bar Assoc 2349-2368
Bos I, Harrington J (2010) Endogenous cartel formation with heterogeneous firms. RAND J Econ 41:92–117
Busse, M., J. Silva-Risso and F. Zettelmeyer (2006), $1,000 Cash back: the pass-through of auto manufacturer promotions, Am Econ Rev 96(4): 1253–1270.
Chicu, M. (2013), Dynamic Investment and Deterrence in the U.S. Cement Industry, Working Paper, Northwestern University, Evanston.
Connor J, Lande R (2006) The size of cartel overcharges. Antitrust Bulle 51:983–1022
Crawford G, Yurukoglu A (2012) The welfare effects of bundling in multichannel television markets. Am Econ Rev 102(2):643–685
Ellison G (1994) Theories of cartel stability and the joint executive committee. RAND J Econ 25:37–57
Ellison S, Snyder C (2010) Countervailing power in wholesale pharmaceuticals. J Ind Econ 58(1):32–53
European Commission (1994), Commission Imposes Fines on a Cement Producers’ Cartel, Press release on 30 November 1994, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases Action.do?reference = IP/94/1108&format = HTML&aged = 1&language = EN&guiLanguage = en (last accessed on 16 August 2015).
Friederiszick H, Röller L-H (2010) Quantification of harm in damages actions for antitrust infringements: insights from German cartel cases. J Compet Law Econ 6:595–618
Genesove D, Mullin W (2001) Rules, communication, and collusion: narrative evidence from the sugar institute case. Am Econ Rev 91:379–398
Goldberg P (1996) Dealer price discrimination in new car purchases: evidence from the consumer expenditure survey. J Polit Econ 104(3):622–654
Gowrisankaran G, Nevo A, Town R (2015) Mergers when prices are negotiated: evidence from the hospital industry. Am Econ Rev 105(1):172–203
Green E, Porter R (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52:87–100
Grennan M (2013) Price discrimination and bargaining: empirical evidence from medical devices. Am Econ Rev 103(1):145–177
Harrington J (2004) Post-cartel pricing during litigation. J Ind Econ 52:517–533
Harrington J, Skrzypacz A (2007) Collusion under monitoring of sales. RAND J Econ 38:314–331
Harrington, J., K. Hüschelrath, U. Laitenberger and F. Smuda (2015), The Discontent Cartel Member and Cartel Collapse: The Case of the German Cement Cartel. Int J Ind Organ 42:106–119
Higher Regional Court (2009), Decision of the Higher Regional Court, Düsseldorf, VI-2a Kart 2–6/08 OWi, 26 June 2009
Hopkins, E. (2008), Price Dispersion, in: Durlauf, S. and L. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, available at http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000368 (last accessed on 16 August 2015).
Houde J-F (2012) Spatial differentiation and vertical mergers in retail markets for gasoline. Am Econ Rev 102(5):2147–2182
Hüschelrath K, Veith T (2014) Cartel detection in procurement markets. Manag Decis Econ 35(6):404–422
Hüschelrath, K., N. Leheyda, K. Müller, T. Veith (2012), Schadensermittlung und Schadensersatz bei Hardcore-Kartellen: Ökonomische Methoden und rechtlicher Rahmen, Baden-Baden
Jevons W (1888) The theory of political economy, Third edn. Macmillan, London
Kaplow L (2011) An economic approach to price fixing. Antitrust Law J 77:343–449
Langer A (2012) Demographic preferences and price discrimination in new vehicle sales. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Working Paper
Levenstein M, Suslow V (2006) What determines cartel success? J Econ Lit 44:43–95
Miller N, Osborne M (2014) Spatial differentiation and price discrimination in the cement industry: evidence from a structural model. RAND J Econ 45(2):221–247
Moulton B (1986) Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. J Econ 32:385–397
Porter R (1983) A study of cartel stability: the joint executive committee, 1880–1886. Bell J Econ 14:301–314
Porter R, Zona J (1999) Ohio school markets: an analysis of bidding. RAND J Econ 30:263–288
Röller L-H, Steen F (2006) On the workings of a cartel: evidence from the Norwegian cement industries. Am Econ Rev 96:321–338
Scott Morton F (1997) Entry and predation: British shipping cartels 1879–1929. J Econ Manag Strateg 6:679–724
Scott Morton F, Zettelmeyer F, Silva-Risso J (2011) What matters in a price negotiation: evidence from the US auto retailing industry. Quant Mark Econ 9:365–402
Scott Morton, F. F. Zettelmeyer and J. Silva-Risso (2003), Consumer information and discrimination: does the internet affect the pricing of new cars to woman and minorities?, Quant Mark Econ 1(1), 65–92
Selten R (1973) A simple model of imperfect competition where four are few and six are many. Int J Game Theory 2:141–201
Sorensen A (2003) Insurer-hospital bargaining: negotiated discounts in post-deregulation Connecticut. J Ind Econ 51(4):471–492
Woodward S, Hall R (2012) Diagnosing consumer confusion and Sub-optimal shopping effort: theory and mortgage-market evidence. Am Econ Rev 102(7):3249–3276