Caregiver burden, coping strategies, and quality of life among family caregivers of adult cancer patients: A multiple regression and mediation analysis in Southern Vietnam

Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng - Tập 8 Số 05 - Trang 137-150 - 2025
Kim Tha Le1, Galang Aliswag Emerson2
2St. Dominic College of Asia, Philippines

Tóm tắt

Objectives: This study aims to: (i) describle caregiver burden, coping strategies, and quality of life among family caregivers of adult cancer patients; (ii) explore the relationships among these variables using multiple regression analysis; and (iii) develop a model to improve family caregivers’ quality of life based on the findings. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical design was employed. Data were collected from 380 family caregivers of adult cancer patients using standardized questionnaires: The Zarit Burden Inventory-22 (ZBI-22), The Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE), and the Caregiver Quality of Life-Cancer (CQOL-C). Data were analyzed using multiple regression and mediation analyses to explore relationships between variables. Results: Caregiver burden, coping strategies, and quality of life were all reported at moderate levels, with overall mean scores of 2.93 ± 0.67, 3.02 ± 0.48, and 2.65 ± 0.49, respectively. Quality of life showed a very strong negative correlation with caregiver burden (r = – 0.76, p < 0.001) and a very strong positive correlation with coping strategies (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that caregiver burden and coping strategies explained 72.4% of the variance in family caregivers’ quality of life. Path analysis within the GLM framework further indicated a significant indirect effect of coping strategies on quality of life mediated by caregiver burden (β = 0.28, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Family caregivers experienced a moderate level of burden and used coping strategies at a moderate level, resulting in a moderate quality of life. These findings emphasize the need for interventions aimed at reducing caregiver burden and strengthening adaptive coping to enhance caregivers’ overall well-being.

Từ khóa

#Caregiver burden #coping strategy #quality of life #family caregiver #path analysis #colorectal cancer

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Cancer Society. (2024, January 17). Global cancer statistics 2024. American Cancer Society. https://pressroom.cancer.org/GlobalCancerStatistics2024.

Ho HT, Jenkins C, Nghiem HLP, Hoang MV, Santin O. Understanding context: A qualitative analysis of the roles of family caregivers of people living with cancer in Vietnam and the implications for service development in low-income settings. Psycho-oncology 2021; 30(10): 1782 - 1788. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5746.

Jenkins C, Ho HT, Nghiem HPL, Prue G, Lohfeld L, Donnelly M. A qualitative study on the needs of cancer caregivers in Vietnam. Global Health Action 2021; 14(1): 1961403. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1961403.

Nguyen HT, Nguyen PTN, Lin CK, Do PM. Association between quality of life and burden of cancer caregivers: An example in a low and middle-income country. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 70: 102596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102596.

Akpan-Idiok PA, Ehiemere IO, Asuquo EF, Chabo JAU, Osuchukwu EC. Assessment of burden and coping strategies among caregivers of cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020; 11(12):1045-1063. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.1045.

Cui P, Yang M, Hu H, Cheng C, Chen X, Chen C, et al. The impact of caregiver burden on quality of life in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a moderated mediation analysis of the role of psychological distress and family resilience. BMC Public Health 2024; 24(1): 817. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18321-3.

Yuen EYN, Wilson CJ. The Relationship between cancer caregiver burden and psychological outcomes: The moderating role of social connectedness. Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) 2021; 29(1): 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29010002.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.) 2021. Wolters Kluwer.

Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the Impaired Elderly: Correlates of Feelings of Burden. The Gerontologist 1980; 20(6): 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/20.6.649.

Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989; 56(2): 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.

Weitzner MA, McMillan SC. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQoLC) Scale: revalidation in a home hospice setting. J Palliat Care 1999; 15(2): 13-20.

Cheung H, Mazerolle L, Possingham HP, Tam P, Biggs D. A methodological guide for translating study instruments in cross-cultural research: Adapting the connectedness to nature scale into Chinese. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2020, 11(11), 1379-1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13465

Hien NT, Phuong NTN. The relationship among quality of life with burden, and related factors of cancer caregivers. Vietnam Medical Journal 2023, 521(1), 296-301. https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v527i1.5686

Thana K, Srisawat N, Chanprasert P. Informal caregiver burden for patients with solid tumors: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology 2021, 36(9), 1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320917462

Kitamura Y, Nakai H, Maekawa Y, Yonezawa H, Kitamura K, Hashimoto T, Motoo Y. Caregiver burden among family caregivers of cancer survivors aged 75 years or older in Japan: a pilot study. Healthcare 2023, 11(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040473

Lee EE, Lee SY. Caregiving experiences of Korean family caregivers of cancer patients: an integrative literature review. Psycho-Oncology 2020, 29(10), 1486-1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5498

Breuning E, Anderson R, Collins D. Psychological burden among caregivers of cancer patients in Western countries: A comparative perspective. Psycho-Oncology 2024, 33(4), 643-652. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.9310

Kamarulbahri TMST, Ariaratnam S, Nikmat AW, Abdullah NN, Khing TL. Coping strategies and their associated factors among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Kuantan, Malaysia. Frontiers in psychiatry 2022, 13, 1004034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1004034

Daniela ACM, Laura XRC, Leonardo MR. Quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients in Colombia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022; 40 (16 Suppl): e24000. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e2400.

Abbasi A, Mirhosseini S, Basirinezhad MH, Ebrahimi H. Relationship between caring burden and quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients in Iran. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2020; 28(9): 4123 - 4129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05240-y.

Liu Z, Chen C, Hu Y. Factors related to the quality of life of family cancer caregivers. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2023; 14: 1180317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1180317.

Amonoo HL, Johnson PC, Nelson AM, Clay MA, Daskalakis E, Newcomb RA, et al. Coping in caregivers of patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Advances 2023; 7(7): 1108-1116.

Van Hof KS, Hoesseini A, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Jansen F, Leemans CR, et al. Self-efficacy and coping style in relation to psychological distress and quality of life in informal caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: a longitudinal study. Supportive Care in Cancer 2023; 31(2): 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07553-x.

Wang K, Gao X, Sun F, De Fries CM. The Association Between Coping Strategies and Caregiver Burden and Depression Among Caregivers of Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in China. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 2021; 14(3): 703-720. https://doi.org/10.1086/717758.

Niu S, Ding S, Wu S, Ma J, Shi Y. Correlations between caregiver competence, burden, and health-related quality of life among Chinese family caregivers of elderly adults with disabilities: a cross-sectional study using structural equations analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13(2): e067296. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067296.