Carbon sequestration and storage in the built environment

Sustainable Production and Consumption - Tập 27 - Trang 1047-1063 - 2021
Jay H. Arehart1,2, Jim Hart1, Francesco Pomponi1,3, Bernardino D'Amico1
1Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom
2Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
3Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alice-Guier, 2020, The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica, J. Ind. Ecol., 24, 534, 10.1111/jiec.12958 Andersson, 2013, Calculating CO2 uptake for existing concrete structures during and after service life, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11625, 10.1021/es401775w Andrade, 2018, Updating carbon storage capacity of spanish cements, Sustainability, 10, 4806, 10.3390/su10124806 Arehart, 2020, On the theoretical carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of hempcrete, J. Clean. Prod., 266, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121846 Arrigoni, 2017, Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: the role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks, J. Clean. Prod., 149, 1051, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.161 Aryapratama, 2019, Estimating in-use wood-based materials carbon stocks in Indonesia: towards a contribution to the national climate mitigation effort, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 149, 301, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.010 Ashraf, 2016, Carbonation of cement-based materials: Challenges and opportunities, Constr. Build. Mater., 120, 558, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080 Bolin, 2011, Life cycle assessment of borate-treated lumber with comparison to galvanized steel framing, J. Clean. Prod., 19, 630, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.005 Braun, 2016, A holistic assessment of greenhouse gas dynamics from forests to the effects of wood products use in Austria, Carbon Manage., 7, 271, 10.1080/17583004.2016.1230990 Breton, 2018, Assessing the climate change impacts of biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical review of two main dynamic approaches, Sustainability, 10, 2020, 10.3390/su10062020 Brunet-Navarro, 2017, The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 22, 1193, 10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z Budzinski, 2020, Estimating the potentials for reducing the impacts on climate change by increasing the cascade use and extending the lifetime of wood products in Germany, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 6 Butarbutar, 2016, Harvested wood products and REDD+: looking beyond the forest border, Carbon Balance Manage., 11, 4, 10.1186/s13021-016-0046-9 Canals-Revilla, 2014, Carbon storage in HWP. Accounting for Spanish particleboard and fiberboard, For. Syst., 23, 225 Cao, 2020, The sponge effect and carbon emission mitigation potentials of the global cement cycle, Nat. Commun., 11, 3777, 10.1038/s41467-020-17583-w Cardellini, 2018, Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic life cycle assessment, Sci. Total Environ., 645, 585, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.044 Chen, 2014, Carbon profile of the managed forest sector in Canada in the 20th century: sink or source?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9859, 10.1021/es5005957 Chen, 2018, Ontario's managed forests and harvested wood products contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation from 2020 to 2100, Forestry Chron., 94, 14 Chen, 2018, Assessing the greenhouse gas effects of harvested wood products manufactured from managed forests in Canada, Forestry, 91, 193, 10.1093/forestry/cpx056 Chen, 2020, Physical and virtual carbon metabolism of global cities, Nat. Commun., 11, 182, 10.1038/s41467-019-13757-3 Cherubini, 2012, Application of probability distributions to the modeling of biogenic CO2 fluxes in life cycle assessment, Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 4, 784, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01156.x Churkina, 2016, The role of urbanization in the global carbon cycle, Front. Ecol. Evol., 3, 10.3389/fevo.2015.00144 Churkina, 2010, Carbon stored in human settlements: the conterminous United States: carbon in human settlements, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 135, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02002.x Churkina, 2020, Buildings as a global carbon sink, Nat. Sustain., 3, 269, 10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4 Collins, 2013, 2nd generation concrete construction: carbon footprint accounting, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 20, 330, 10.1108/ECAM-09-2010-0072 Crafford, 2017, The potential of South African timber products to reduce the environmental impact of buildings, S. Afr. J. Sci., 113, 10.17159/sajs.2017/20160354 D'Amico, 2021, Global potential for material substitution in building construction: the case of cross laminated timber, J. Clean. Prod., 279 De Rosa, 2018, How methodological choices affect LCA climate impact results: the case of structural timber, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 147, 10.1007/s11367-017-1312-0 Demertzi, 2017, Environmental performance of expanded cork slab and granules through life cycle assessment, J. Clean. Prod., 145, 294, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.071 Di Maria, 2020, Environmental assessment of CO2 mineralisation for sustainable construction materials, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 93, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102882 Ellingboe, 2019, On the theoretical CO2 sequestration potential of pervious concrete, Infrastructures, 4, 12, 10.3390/infrastructures4010012 Elsevier (2019). elsapy: A Python module for use with Elsevier's APIs v. 0.5.0 available at: https://github.com/ElsevierDev/elsapy. Florentin, 2017, A life-cycle energy and carbon analysis of hemp-lime bio-composite building materials, Energy Build., 156, 293, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.097 Forster, 2020, Lime binders for the repair of historic buildings: considerations for CO2 abatement, J. Clean. Prod., 252, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119802 Fouquet, 2015, Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment, Build. Environ., 90, 51, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.022 Frischknecht, 2019, Comparison of the environmental assessment of an identical office building with national methods, IOP Conf. Ser., 323 Galan, 2010, Sequestration of CO2 by concrete carbonation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3181, 10.1021/es903581d Ganguly, 2020, Global warming mitigating role of wood products from Washington State's private forests, Forests, 11, 194, 10.3390/f11020194 Garcia, 2014, Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG protocol, PAS 2050 and climate declaration, J. Clean. Prod., 66, 199, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.073 Geng, 2017, Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation, For. Policy Econ., 85, 192, 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.007 Gu, 2019, Carbon footprint analysis of bamboo scrimber flooring—implications for carbon sequestration of bamboo forests and its products, Forests, 10, 51, 10.3390/f10010051 Guest, 2013, Global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from biomass stored in the anthroposphere and used for bioenergy at end of life, J. Ind. Ecol., 17, 20, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00507.x Guest, 2014, Climate change impacts due to biogenic carbon: addressing the issue of attribution using two metrics with very different outcomes, J. Sustain. For., 33, 298, 10.1080/10549811.2013.872997 Hafner, 2018, Method for assessing the national implications of environmental impacts from timber buildings—an exemplary study for residential buildings in Germany, Wood Fiber Sci., 50, 139, 10.22382/wfs-2018-047 Hafner, 2018, Method for assessing the national implications of environmental impacts from timber buildings—an exemplary study for residential buildings in Germany, WFS, 50, 139, 10.22382/wfs-2018-047 Hafner, 2017, Comparative LCA study of different timber and mineral buildings and calculation method for substitution factors on building level, J. Clean. Prod., 167, 630, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.203 Harmon, 2019, Have product substitution carbon benefits been overestimated? A sensitivity analysis of key assumptions, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e95 Hart, 2020, More timber in construction: unanswered questions and future challenges, Sustainability, 12, 3473, 10.3390/su12083473 Härtl, 2017, A new way of carbon accounting emphasises the crucial role of sustainable timber use for successful carbon mitigation strategies, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 22, 1163, 10.1007/s11027-016-9720-1 Hassan, 2019, Cross-laminated timber flooring and concrete slab flooring: a comparative study of structural design, economic and environmental consequences, J. Build. Eng., 26 Head, 2020, Dynamic greenhouse gas life cycle inventory and impact profiles of wood used in Canadian buildings, Build. Environ., 173, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106751 Heräjärvi, 2019, Wooden buildings as carbon storages–mitigation or oration?, Wood Mater. Sci. Eng., 14, 291, 10.1080/17480272.2019.1635205 Heidari, 2019, Regionalised life cycle assessment of bio-based materials in construction; the case of hemp shiv treated with sol-gel coatings, Materials, 12, 2987, 10.3390/ma12182987 Hildebrandt, 2017, The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in Europe, Sustain. Cities Soc., 34, 405, 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013 Hill, 2019, The environmental consequences concerning the use of timber in the built environment, Front. Built Environ., 5, 129, 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00129 Hill, 2016, The environmental impact of wood compared to other building materials, Int. Wood Prod. J., 7, 215, 10.1080/20426445.2016.1190166 Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Jamsranjav, B., Fukuda, M., Troxler, T., 2013. IPCC 2013 revised supplementary methods and good practice guidance arising from the Kyoto protocol task force on national greenhouse gas inventories. Hoxha, 2020, Biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical overview of LCA methods, Build. Cities, 1, 504, 10.5334/bc.46 IEA, 2020. Data and statistics-CO2 emissions per capita [WWW Document]. URL https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics 2018 Ingerson, 2011, Carbon storage potential of harvested wood: summary and policy implications, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 16, 307, 10.1007/s11027-010-9267-5 Ingrao, 2015, Energy and environmental assessment of industrial hemp for building applications: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 51, 29, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.002 Iordan, 2018, Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland, Carbon Balance Manage., 13, 12, 10.1186/s13021-018-0101-9 IPCC (2006). Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Vol. 4 Chapter 12. Available at: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_12_Ch12_HWP.pdf. IPCC, 2018. Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response in Global Warming of 1.5°C. Ji, 2013, Carbon sequestration and carbon flow in harvested wood products for China, Int. For. Rev., 15, 160 Johnston, 2019, Global mitigation potential of carbon stored in harvested wood products, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116, 14526, 10.1073/pnas.1904231116 Kalt, 2018, Carbon dynamics and GHG implications of increasing wood construction: long-term scenarios for residential buildings in Austria, Carbon Manage., 9, 265, 10.1080/17583004.2018.1469948 Kayo, 2014, Carbon balance assessments of harvested wood products in Japan taking account of inter-regional flows, Environ. Sci. Policy, 37, 215, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.006 Kayo, 2015, Climate change mitigation effect of harvested wood products in regions of Japan, Carbon Balance Manage., 10, 24, 10.1186/s13021-015-0036-3 Knauf, 2015, Modeling the CO2-effects of forest management and wood usage on a regional basis, Carbon Balance Manage., 10, 13, 10.1186/s13021-015-0024-7 Lagerblad, 2006 Lauk, 2012, Global socioeconomic carbon stocks in long-lived products 1900–2008, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034023 Lawrence, 2015, Reducing the environmental impact of construction by using renewable materials, J. Renew. Mater., 3, 163, 10.7569/JRM.2015.634105 Lee, 2016, Evaluation of the carbon dioxide uptake of slag-blended concrete structures, considering the effect of carbonation, Sustainability, 8, 312, 10.3390/su8040312 Lee, 2011, Carbon sequestration in Taiwan harvested wood products, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 18, 154, 10.1080/13504509.2011.553353 Levasseur, 2012, Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches, Clim. Change, 115, 759, 10.1007/s10584-012-0473-x Levasseur, 2013, Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment, J. Ind. Ecol., 17, 117, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x Lippiatt, 2020, Towards carbon-neutral construction materials: carbonation of cement-based materials and the future perspective, J. Build. Eng., 28 Liptow, 2018, Accounting for effects of carbon flows in LCA of biomass-based products–exploration and evaluation of a selection of existing methods, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 2110, 10.1007/s11367-018-1436-x Lupíšek, 2017, Design strategies for buildings with low embodied energy, Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.–Eng. Sustain., 170, 65 Malone, 2014, Environmental impact assessment of light-frame and timber frame structures, J. Green Build., 9, 102, 10.3992/1943-4618-9.2.102 Marland, 2010, A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 15, 71, 10.1007/s11027-009-9205-6 Mattila, 2012, Is biochar or straw-bale construction a better carbon storage from a life cycle perspective?, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 90, 452, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.006 Mehr, 2018, Environmentally optimal wood use in Switzerland–investigating the relevance of material cascades, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 131, 181, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.026 Morris, 2017, Recycle, bury, or burn wood waste biomass?: LCA answer depends on carbon accounting, emissions controls, displaced fuels, and impact costs: recycle, bury, or burn wood waste biomass?, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 844, 10.1111/jiec.12469 Müller, 2013, Carbon emissions of infrastructure development, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11739, 10.1021/es402618m Nakano, 2020, Environmental impacts of building construction using cross-laminated timber panel construction method: a case of the research building in Kyushu, Japan, Sustainability, 12, 2220, 10.3390/su12062220 Nässén, 2012, Concrete vs. wood in buildings–an energy system approach, Build. Environ., 51, 361, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.011 Negishi, 2019, Evaluating climate change pathways through a building's lifecycle based on dynamic life cycle assessment, Build. Environ., 164, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106377 Negro, 2019, Carbon stored by furnishing wood-based products: an Italian case study, Maderas Cienc. Tecnol., 10.4067/S0718-221X2019005000106 Nepal, 2016, Carbon mitigation impacts of increased softwood lumber and structural panel use for nonresidential construction in the United States, Forest Prod. J., 66, 77, 10.13073/FPJ-D-15-00019 Nunery, 2010, Forest carbon storage in the northeastern United States: net effects of harvesting frequency, post-harvest retention, and wood products, Forest Ecol. Manage., 259, 1363, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.029 Nygaard, 2019, Increased use of timber in new buildings in Oslo and Akershus: potentials and GHG Emission effects, Front. Built Environ., 5, 131, 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00131 Padilla-Rivera, 2018, Evaluating the Link between low carbon reductions strategies and its performance in the context of climate change: a carbon footprint of a wood-frame residential building in Quebec, Canada, Sustainability, 10, 2715, 10.3390/su10082715 Parobek, 2019, Changes in carbon balance of harvested wood products resulting from different wood utilization scenarios, Forests, 10, 590, 10.3390/f10070590 Peñaloza, 2018, Future scenarios for climate mitigation of new construction in Sweden: Effects of different technological pathways, J. Cleaner Prod., 187, 1025, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.285 Peñaloza, 2016, Exploring the climate impact effects of increased use of bio-based materials in buildings, Constr. Build. Mater., 125, 219, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.041 Peñaloza, 2019, The influence of system boundaries and baseline in climate impact assessment of forest products, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 24, 160, 10.1007/s11367-018-1495-z Pierobon, 2019, Environmental benefits of using hybrid CLT structure in midrise non-residential construction: an LCA based comparative case study in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, J. Build. Eng., 26 Pilli, 2015, EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products, Carbon Balance Manage., 10, 6, 10.1186/s13021-015-0016-7 Pingoud, 2012, Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 17, 369, 10.1007/s11027-011-9331-9 Pingoud, 2006, Harvested Wood Products, 4 Pittau, 2018, Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls, Build. Environ., 129, 117, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006 Pittau, 2019, Retrofit as a carbon sink: the carbon storage potentials of the EU housing stock, J. Clean. Prod., 214, 365, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.304 Pomponi, 2017, Holistic study of a timber double skin façade: whole life carbon emissions and structural optimisation, Build. Environ., 124, 42, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.046 Pomponi, 2020, Buildings as a global carbon sink? A reality check on feasibility limits, One Earth, 3, 157, 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.018 Pomponi, 2016, Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment–what does the evidence say?, J. Environ. Manage., 181, 687, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036 Pretot, 2014, Life cycle assessment of a hemp concrete wall: impact of thickness and coating, Build. Environ., 72, 223, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.010 2017 Robson, 2014, Carbon sequestered in UK forest products and wood based panels in construction: helping to meet UK's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, Int. Wood Prod. J., 5, 139, 10.1179/2042645314Y.0000000071 Röck, 2020, Embodied GHG emissions of buildings–the hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation, Appl. Energy, 258, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107 Røyne, 2016, Climate impact assessment in life cycle assessments of forest products: implications of method choice for results and decision-making, J. Clean. Prod., 116, 90, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.009 Salzer, 2017, Environmental performance of social housing in emerging economies: life cycle assessment of conventional and alternative construction methods in the Philippines, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 1785, 10.1007/s11367-017-1362-3 Sanquetta, 2019, Carbon storage and CO2 dynamics from wood products harvested in Brazil during 1900–2016, Carbon Manage., 10, 417, 10.1080/17583004.2019.1630242 Sathre, 2010, Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 104, 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005 Scrucca, 2020, Energy and carbon footprint assessment of production of hemp hurds for application in buildings, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 84, 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106417 Seppälä, 2019, Effect of increased wood harvesting and utilization on required greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood-based products and fuels, J. Environ. Manage., 247, 580, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.031 Sierra-Pérez, 2016, Environmental implications of the use of agglomerated cork as thermal insulation in buildings, J. Clean. Prod., 126, 97, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.146 Sikkema, 2013, The GHG contribution of the cascaded use of harvested wood products in comparison with the use of wood for energy–a case study on available forest resources in Canada, Environ. Sci. Policy, 31, 96, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.007 Silvestre, 2016, Insulation cork boards—environmental life cycle assessment of an organic construction material, Materials, 9, 394, 10.3390/ma9050394 Sinka, 2018, Comparative life cycle assessment of magnesium binders as an alternative for hemp concrete, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 133, 288, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.024 Smyth, 2017, Estimating product and energy substitution benefits in national-scale mitigation analyses for Canada, GCB Bioenergy, 9, 1071, 10.1111/gcbb.12389 Sodagar, 2011, The carbon-reduction potential of straw-bale housing, Build. Res. Inf., 39, 51, 10.1080/09613218.2010.528187 Soimakallio, 2016, Climate change mitigation challenge for wood utilization—the case of Finland, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5127, 10.1021/acs.est.6b00122 Soust-Verdaguer, 2020, Implications of using systematic decomposition structures to organize building LCA information: a comparative analysis of national standards and guidelines- IEA EBC ANNEX 72, IOP Conf. Ser., 588 Souto-Martinez, 2018, Cradle-to-gate CO2e emissions vs. in situ CO2 sequestration of structural concrete elements, Energy Build., 167, 301, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.042 Souto-Martinez, 2017, A mathematical model for predicting the carbon sequestration potential of ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 147, 417, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.133 Tellnes, 2017, Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: a review study for construction materials based on forest products, iForest, 10, 815, 10.3832/ifor2386-010 Tellnes, 2014, Carbon footprint including effect of carbon storage for selected wooden facade materials, Wood Mater. Sci. Eng., 9, 139, 10.1080/17480272.2014.904432 Tripathi, 2019, Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential resource, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 35, 10.1038/s41612-019-0093-5 Tsunetsugu, 2010, Quantitative estimation of carbon removal effects due to wood utilization up to 2050 in Japan: effects from carbon storage and substitution of fossil fuels by harvested wood products, J. Wood Sci., 56, 339, 10.1007/s10086-009-1107-4 Violano, 2018, Beyond materials: the experimentation of bio-based grown materials from mycelia, TECHNE, 299 Vogtländer, 2014, Carbon sequestration in LCA, a proposal for a new approach based on the global carbon cycle; cases on wood and on bamboo, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 13, 10.1007/s11367-013-0629-6 Werner, 2010, National and global greenhouse gas dynamics of different forest management and wood use scenarios: a model-based assessment, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 72, 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.10.004 Wijnants, 2019, Life-cycle assessment of timber frame constructions–the case of rooftop extensions, J. Clean. Prod., 216, 333, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.278 2020 Xi, 2016, Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation, Nat. Geosci., 9, 880, 10.1038/ngeo2840 Ximenes, 2013, Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 891, 10.1007/s11367-012-0533-5 Zampori, 2013, Life cycle assessment of hemp cultivation and use of hemp-based thermal insulator materials in buildings, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7413, 10.1021/es401326a Zea Escamilla, 2018, Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings, Sustainability, 10, 3096, 10.3390/su10093096 Zea Escamilla, 2016, When CO2 counts: sustainability assessment of industrialized bamboo as an alternative for social housing programs in the Philippines, Build. Environ., 103, 44, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.003 Zhang, 2019, Harvested wood products as a carbon sink in China, 1900–2016, IJERPH, 16, 445, 10.3390/ijerph16030445 Zhang, 2020, Improving carbon stock estimates for in-use harvested wood products by linking production and consumption—a global case study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2565, 10.1021/acs.est.9b05721