Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

Xiao, X. M., Biradar, C. M., Czarnecki, C., Alabi, T. & Keller, M. A simple algorithm for large-scale mapping of evergreen forests in tropical America, Africa and Asia. Remote Sens. 1, 355–374 (2009).

Pan, Y. D. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).

Davidson, E. A. et al. The Amazon basin in transition. Nature 481, 321–328 (2012).

Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).

Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).

Fearnside, P. M. Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Science 353, 746–748 (2016).

Fearnside, P. M. Business as Usual: A Resurgence of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2017).

Berenguer, E. et al. A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3713–3726 (2014).

Brienen, R. J. W. et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 519, 344–348 (2015).

Doughty, C. E. et al. Drought impact on forest carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia. Nature 519, 78–82 (2015).

Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).

Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).

PRODES Legal Amazon Deforestation Monitoring System (INPE, 2018); http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes

Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

Tyukavina, A. et al. Types and rates of forest disturbance in Brazilian Legal Amazon, 2000–2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601047 (2017).

Qin, Y. et al. Improved estimates of forest cover and loss in the Brazilian Amazon in 2000–2017. Nat. Sustain. 2, 764–772 (2019).

Seymour, F. & Harris, N. L. Reducing tropical deforestation. Science 365, 756–757 (2019).

Richards, P., Arima, E., VanWey, L., Cohn, A. & Bhattarai, N. Are Brazil’s deforesters avoiding detection? Conserv. Lett. 10, 470–476 (2017).

Fan, L. et al. Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics. Nat. Plants 5, 944–951 (2019).

Brandt, M. et al. Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 827–835 (2018).

Wigneron, J.-P. et al. Tropical forests did not recover from the strong 2015–2016 El Niño event. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4603 (2020).

Wigneron, J.-P. et al. SMOS-IC data record of soil moisture and L-VOD: historical development, applications and perspectives. Remote Sens. Environ. 254, 112238 (2021).

Qin, Y. W. et al. Annual dynamics of forest areas in South America during 2007–2010 at 50 m spatial resolution. Remote Sens. Environ. 201, 73–87 (2017).

Ferrante, L. & Fearnside, P. M. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environ. Conserv. 46, 261–263 (2019).

Artaxo, P. Working together for Amazonia. Science 363, 323–323 (2019).

Aragão, L. E. O. C. et al. 21st century drought-related fires counteract the decline of Amazon deforestation carbon emissions. Nat. Commun. 9, 536 (2018).

Nunes, S., Oliveira, L., Siqueira, J., Morton, D. C. & Souza, C. M. Unmasking secondary vegetation dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034057 (2020).

Hilker, T. et al. Vegetation dynamics and rainfall sensitivity of the Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16041–16046 (2014).

Liu, J. et al. Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Nino. Science 358, eaam5690 (2017).

Giardina, F. et al. Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability. Nat. Geosci. 11, 405–409 (2018).

Matricardi, E. A. T. et al. Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 369, 1378–1382 (2020).

Yang, Y. et al. Post-drought decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 9, 3172 (2018).

Gatti, L. V. et al. Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements. Nature 506, 76–80 (2014).

Asner, G. P. et al. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 310, 480–482 (2005).

Silva, C. H. L.Jr et al. Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8360 (2020).

Espírito-Santo, F. D. B. et al. Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3434 (2014).

Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F. & Nepstad, D. The 2010 Amazon drought. Science 331, 554–554 (2011).

Jiménez-Muñoz, J. C. et al. Record-breaking warming and extreme drought in the Amazon rainforest during the course of El Niño 2015–2016. Sci. Rep. 6, 33130 (2016).

Harris, N. L. et al. Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336, 1573–1576 (2012).

Aguiar, A. P. D. et al. Land use change emission scenarios: anticipating a forest transition process in the Brazilian Amazon. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1821–1840 (2016).

Aragão, L. E. O. C. et al. Environmental change and the carbon balance of Amazonian forests. Biol. Rev. 89, 913–931 (2014).

Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).

Silva, C. V. J. et al. Estimating the multi-decadal carbon deficit of burned Amazonian forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114023 (2020).

Silva, C. V. J. et al. Drought-induced Amazonian wildfires instigate a decadal-scale disruption of forest carbon dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20180043 (2018).

Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Lagan, B. O. & Haugaasen, T. Large tree mortality and the decline of forest biomass following Amazonian wildfires. Ecol. Lett. 6, 6–8 (2003).

Fuchs, R. et al. Why the US–China trade war spells disaster for the Amazon. Nature 567, 451–454 (2019).

Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. & Tyukavina, A. Comment on ‘Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss’. Science 363, eaar3629 (2019).

Dubayah, R. et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).

Doughty, R. et al. TROPOMI reveals dry-season increase of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the Amazon forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22393–22398 (2019).

Moore, B. III et al. The potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to provide multi-scale constraints on the carbon cycle in the Americas. Front. Environ. Sci. 6, 109 (2018).

Landsat (NASA, USGS, 2019); https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/news/media-resources

Avitabile, V. et al. An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1406–1420 (2016).

Fernandez-Moran, R. et al. SMOS-IC: an alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation optical depth product. Remote Sens. 9, 457 (2017).

Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J. et al. An evaluation of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth (L-VOD) data sets: high sensitivity of L-VOD to above-ground biomass in Africa. Biogeosciences 15, 4627–4645 (2018).

Konings, A. G. & Gentine, P. Global variations in ecosystem-scale isohydricity. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 891–905 (2017).

Liu, Y. Y. et al. Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 470–474 (2015).

Moesinger, L. et al. The global long-term microwave Vegetation Optical Depth Climate Archive (VODCA). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 177–196 (2020).

Tang, H. et al. Characterizing global forest canopy cover distribution using spaceborne lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111262 (2019).

Crisp, D. et al. The on-orbit performance of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) instrument and its radiometrically calibrated products. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 59–81 (2017).

Kiel, M. et al. How bias correction goes wrong: measurement of XCO2 affected by erroneous surface pressure estimates. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 2241–2259 (2019).

Worden, J. R. et al. Evaluation and attribution of OCO-2 XCO2 uncertainties. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 2759–2771 (2017).

Giglio, L. & Justice, C. MOD14A2 MODIS/Terra Thermal Anomalies/Fire 8-Day L3 Global 1 km SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015).

Giglio, L., Justice, C., Boschetti, L. & Roy, D. MCD64A1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Burned Area Monthly L3 Global 500 m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015).

Huffman, G. et al. Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG). Version 4.4 (NASA’s Precipitation Processing Center, 2014); ftp://arthurhou.pps.eosdis.nasa.gov/gpmdata/

Running, S., Mu, Q. & Zhao, M. MOD16A2 MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2017).

Qin, Y., Xiao, X. & Wigneron, J.-P. Annual evergreen forest maps in the Brazilian Amazon during 2010–2019. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14115518.v1 (2021).

Qin, Y., Xiao, X. & Wigneron, J.-P. Annual aboveground biomass maps in the Brazilian Amazon during 2010–2019. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14115566.v1 (2021).

Qin, Y., Xiao, X. & Wigneron, J.-P. Code for evergreen forest and aboveground biomass analyses in the Brazilian Amazon. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14115680.v1 (2021).