Capturing the invisible: Non-institutional technologies in undergraduate learning within three New Zealand universities

Internet and Higher Education - Tập 58 - Trang 100910 - 2023
Qian Liu1, Tehmina Gladman1, Christina Grove1, Sally Eberhard2, Susan Geertshuis3, Anthony Ali1, Phil Blyth1, Rebecca Grainger1
1University of Otago, 362 Leith Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
2Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
3University of Auckland, 12 Grafton Rd, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aagaard, 2015, Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology, Computers & Education, 87, 90, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.010 Anastasakis, 2017, Links between students’ goals and their choice of educational resources in undergraduate mathematics, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 36, 67, 10.1093/teamat/hrx003 Andrews, 2012, Distance learners: Connected, mobile and resourceful individuals, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 10.14742/ajet.828 Berry, 2019, Non-institutional learning technologies, risks and responsibilities: A critical discourse analysis of university artefacts, Research in Learning Technology, 27, 10.25304/rlt.v27.2284 Biggs, 2014 Blau, 2020, How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?, The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722 Bond, 2018, Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1, 10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1 Braun, 2021, Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 37, 10.1002/capr.12360 Braun, 2021, One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 328, 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 Braun, 2023, Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher, International Journal of Transgender Health, 24, 1, 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 Clegg, 2013, The interview reconsidered: Context, genre, reflexivity and interpretation in sociological approaches to interviews in higher education research, Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 5, 10.1080/07294360.2012.750277 Collins, 2018, The central role of theory in qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 10.1177/1609406918797475 Conole, 2008, ‘Disruptive technologies’,‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology, Computers & Education, 50, 511, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009 Corrin, 2010, Technological diversity: An investigation of students’ technology use in everyday life and academic study, Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 387, 10.1080/17439884.2010.531024 Costley, 2022, The interaction of collaboration, note-taking completeness, and performance over 10 weeks of an online course, The Internet and Higher Education, 52, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100831 Courtney, 2022, Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing, The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873 DiMaggio, 1998, The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 154, 696 Finlay, 2002, “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity, Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531, 10.1177/104973202129120052 Flavin, 2016, Home and away: The use of institutional and non-institutional technologies to support learning and teaching, Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1665, 10.1080/10494820.2015.1041404 Geertshuis, 2022, Stuck between a rock and a hard place: The challenge of preparing graduates for their futures, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-15 Hatala, 2023, Progression of students’ SRL processes in subsequent programming problem-solving tasks and its association with tasks outcomes, The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100881 Henderson, 2017, What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1567, 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946 Hockings, 2018, Independent learning–what we do when you’re not there, Teaching in Higher Education, 23, 145, 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031 Hsieh, 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277, 10.1177/1049732305276687 Judd, 2011, Expediency-based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 351, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x Klobas, 2010, The role of involvement in learning management system success, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22, 114, 10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5 Lacka, 2021, Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of virtual learning environment and social media use in higher education, Computers & Education, 163, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099 Lacka, 2019, Examining the impact of digital technologies on students’ higher education outcomes: The case of the virtual learning environment and social media, Studies in Higher Education Laverty, 2003, Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 21, 10.1177/160940690300200303 Liu, 2021, Professional identity and the adoption of learning management systems, Studies in Higher Education, 46, 624, 10.1080/03075079.2019.1647413 Liu, 2020, Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review, Computers & Education, 151, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857 Looi, 2010, Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 154, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x Lowe, 2007, Exploring the work/life/study balance: The experience of higher education students in a Scottish further education college, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 225, 10.1080/03098770701424942 Margaryan, 2011, Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies, Computers & Education, 56, 429, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004 Marton, 2014 Maxwell, 2012, The importance of qualitative research for causal explanation in education, Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 655, 10.1177/1077800412452856 Mills, 2009 Neubauer, 2019, How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others, Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 90, 10.1007/S40037-019-0509-2 Parpala, 2010, Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 269, 10.1348/000709909X476946 Pawson, 2006 Piaget, 1973 Pimmer, 2013, Mobile learning in resource-constrained environments: A case study of medical education, Medical Teacher, 35, e1157, 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733454 Quigley, 2018 Reid, 2016, Content and discontent: A qualitative exploration of obstacles to elearning engagement in medical students, BMC Medical Education, 16, 188, 10.1186/s12909-016-0710-5 Rivers, 2021, Metacognition about practice testing: A review of learners’ beliefs, monitoring, and control of test-enhanced learning, Educational Psychology Review, 33, 823, 10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2 Rosenberger, 2009, The sudden experience of the computer, AI & SOCIETY, 24, 173, 10.1007/s00146-009-0190-9 Sankey Schepman, 2012, An observational study of undergraduate students’ adoption of (mobile) note-taking software, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 308, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.014 Scherer, 2019, Editorial to the special section—Technology acceptance models: What we know and what we (still) do not know, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2387, 10.1111/bjet.12866 Schoonenboom, 2014, Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others, Computers & Education, 71, 247, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016 Selwyn, 2016, Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 1006, 10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229 Sfard, 1998, On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27, 4, 10.3102/0013189X027002004 Sfard, 2005, Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity, Educational Researcher, 34, 14, 10.3102/0013189X034004014 Sharpe, 2010, Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning: Towards creative appropriation, 107 Shephard, 2015, Teaching research integrity in higher education: Policy and strategy, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37, 615, 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1102823 Sweller, 2020, Cognitive load theory and educational technology, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1, 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3 Twining, 2017, Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies, Computers & Education, 106, A1, 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002 Varpio, 2021, The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research, Medical Education, 55, 167, 10.1111/medu.14348 Venkatesh, 2016, Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 328, 10.17705/1jais.00428 Wu, 2022, Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement, The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100871 Wynter, 2019, Medical students: What educational resources are they using?, BMC Medical Education, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9 Yılmaz, 2022, Language education for social justice: Reproductions or disruptions through technology, Computers & Education, 104535 Zimmerman, 2011, Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview, 15