Capturing the invisible: Non-institutional technologies in undergraduate learning within three New Zealand universities
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aagaard, 2015, Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology, Computers & Education, 87, 90, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.010
Anastasakis, 2017, Links between students’ goals and their choice of educational resources in undergraduate mathematics, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 36, 67, 10.1093/teamat/hrx003
Andrews, 2012, Distance learners: Connected, mobile and resourceful individuals, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 10.14742/ajet.828
Berry, 2019, Non-institutional learning technologies, risks and responsibilities: A critical discourse analysis of university artefacts, Research in Learning Technology, 27, 10.25304/rlt.v27.2284
Biggs, 2014
Blau, 2020, How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?, The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
Bond, 2018, Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1, 10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Braun, 2021, Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 37, 10.1002/capr.12360
Braun, 2021, One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 328, 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, 2023, Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher, International Journal of Transgender Health, 24, 1, 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Clegg, 2013, The interview reconsidered: Context, genre, reflexivity and interpretation in sociological approaches to interviews in higher education research, Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 5, 10.1080/07294360.2012.750277
Collins, 2018, The central role of theory in qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 10.1177/1609406918797475
Conole, 2008, ‘Disruptive technologies’,‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology, Computers & Education, 50, 511, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
Corrin, 2010, Technological diversity: An investigation of students’ technology use in everyday life and academic study, Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 387, 10.1080/17439884.2010.531024
Costley, 2022, The interaction of collaboration, note-taking completeness, and performance over 10 weeks of an online course, The Internet and Higher Education, 52, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100831
Courtney, 2022, Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing, The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
DiMaggio, 1998, The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 154, 696
Finlay, 2002, “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity, Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531, 10.1177/104973202129120052
Flavin, 2016, Home and away: The use of institutional and non-institutional technologies to support learning and teaching, Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1665, 10.1080/10494820.2015.1041404
Geertshuis, 2022, Stuck between a rock and a hard place: The challenge of preparing graduates for their futures, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-15
Hatala, 2023, Progression of students’ SRL processes in subsequent programming problem-solving tasks and its association with tasks outcomes, The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100881
Henderson, 2017, What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1567, 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
Hockings, 2018, Independent learning–what we do when you’re not there, Teaching in Higher Education, 23, 145, 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031
Hsieh, 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277, 10.1177/1049732305276687
Judd, 2011, Expediency-based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 351, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x
Klobas, 2010, The role of involvement in learning management system success, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22, 114, 10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5
Lacka, 2021, Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of virtual learning environment and social media use in higher education, Computers & Education, 163, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099
Lacka, 2019, Examining the impact of digital technologies on students’ higher education outcomes: The case of the virtual learning environment and social media, Studies in Higher Education
Laverty, 2003, Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 21, 10.1177/160940690300200303
Liu, 2021, Professional identity and the adoption of learning management systems, Studies in Higher Education, 46, 624, 10.1080/03075079.2019.1647413
Liu, 2020, Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review, Computers & Education, 151, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857
Looi, 2010, Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 154, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x
Lowe, 2007, Exploring the work/life/study balance: The experience of higher education students in a Scottish further education college, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 225, 10.1080/03098770701424942
Margaryan, 2011, Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies, Computers & Education, 56, 429, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Marton, 2014
Maxwell, 2012, The importance of qualitative research for causal explanation in education, Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 655, 10.1177/1077800412452856
Mills, 2009
Neubauer, 2019, How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others, Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 90, 10.1007/S40037-019-0509-2
Parpala, 2010, Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 269, 10.1348/000709909X476946
Pawson, 2006
Piaget, 1973
Pimmer, 2013, Mobile learning in resource-constrained environments: A case study of medical education, Medical Teacher, 35, e1157, 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733454
Quigley, 2018
Reid, 2016, Content and discontent: A qualitative exploration of obstacles to elearning engagement in medical students, BMC Medical Education, 16, 188, 10.1186/s12909-016-0710-5
Rivers, 2021, Metacognition about practice testing: A review of learners’ beliefs, monitoring, and control of test-enhanced learning, Educational Psychology Review, 33, 823, 10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2
Rosenberger, 2009, The sudden experience of the computer, AI & SOCIETY, 24, 173, 10.1007/s00146-009-0190-9
Sankey
Schepman, 2012, An observational study of undergraduate students’ adoption of (mobile) note-taking software, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 308, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.014
Scherer, 2019, Editorial to the special section—Technology acceptance models: What we know and what we (still) do not know, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2387, 10.1111/bjet.12866
Schoonenboom, 2014, Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others, Computers & Education, 71, 247, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016
Selwyn, 2016, Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 1006, 10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
Sfard, 1998, On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27, 4, 10.3102/0013189X027002004
Sfard, 2005, Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity, Educational Researcher, 34, 14, 10.3102/0013189X034004014
Sharpe, 2010, Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning: Towards creative appropriation, 107
Shephard, 2015, Teaching research integrity in higher education: Policy and strategy, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37, 615, 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1102823
Sweller, 2020, Cognitive load theory and educational technology, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1, 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Twining, 2017, Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies, Computers & Education, 106, A1, 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002
Varpio, 2021, The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research, Medical Education, 55, 167, 10.1111/medu.14348
Venkatesh, 2016, Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 328, 10.17705/1jais.00428
Wu, 2022, Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement, The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100871
Wynter, 2019, Medical students: What educational resources are they using?, BMC Medical Education, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9
Yılmaz, 2022, Language education for social justice: Reproductions or disruptions through technology, Computers & Education, 104535
Zimmerman, 2011, Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview, 15