Capabilities and Constraints
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aggarwal, J. C. (2001). Census in India, 2001: Population policy of India: Population and progress in global perspective. Delhi: Doaba House.
Atkinson, A. B. (1999). The contributions of Amartya Sen to welfare economics. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2), 173–190.
Basu, K. (1984). Implicit Interest Rates, Usury and Isolation in Backward Agriculture. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.8.
Beteille, A. (1965). Caste, class and power: Changing patterns of social stratification in a Tanjore Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bhaduri, A. (1973). A study in agricultural backwardness under semi-feudalism. Economic Journal, 83, 120–137.
Bharadwaj, K. (1974). Production conditions in Indian agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. K. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford: Clarendon.
Dumont, L. (1980). Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gang, I. N., Sen, K., & Yun, M. (2006). Caste, ethnicity and poverty in rural India, Working Paper Series No. 2006–34. New Brunswick: University of Rutgers.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California.
Gorman, W. M. (1956). "A possible procedure for analysing quality differentials in the eggs market" Review of Economic Studies, (Oct 1980) 47, 843–856.
Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jensen, H. (2001). Amartya Sen as a Smithesque Worldly Philosopher or: Who needs Sen when we have Smith? Paper prepared for the conference on Justice and poverty: Examining Sen’s capability approach. von Hugel Institute, St. Edmund’s College, 5–7 June.
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Berlin: Springer.
Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.
Morriss, P. (2002). Power: A philosophical analysis (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.
Platteau, J-Ph. (1992). Aristocratic patronage as an ingredient of the caste system: Formal analysis and dynamic considerations, STICERD Discussion Paper 36, London School of Economics.
Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined’, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Discussion Paper 00.30.
Robeyns, I. (2001a). Sen’s capability approach and feminist concerns, Paper prepared for the Conference on Sen’s Capability Approach, St. Edmunds College, June 5–7.
Robeyns, I. (2001b). Understanding Sen’s capability approach. Mimeo, Wolfson College, University of Cambridge.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender equality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.
Sack, R. (1983). Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(1), 55–74.
Sen, A. K. (1977). On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis Econometrica, 45(7), 1539–72.
Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, A. K. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality re-examined. (Expanded edition with a substantial annexe by James Foster and Amartya Sen). Oxford: Clarendon.
Sen, A. K. (2000). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Srinivas, M. N. (1962). Caste in modern India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
Stones, R. (2009). Power and structuration theory. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power. London: Sage.
Subramaniam, S. V., & Duncan, C. (2000). Capability and contextuality, Working Paper Series, Vol 10, No. 10. Harvard: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.
Teschl, M., & Derobert, L. (2001). Capabilities, networks and activity, Paper prepared for the conference on Justice and poverty: Examining Sen’s capability approach, von Hugel Institute, St. Edmund’s College, 5–7 June.