Can specific personality traits better explain EU attitudes?

Acta Politica - Tập 56 - Trang 530-547 - 2020
Julian Aichholzer1, Beatrice Rammstedt2
1Department of Government, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany

Tóm tắt

Scholars trying to understand attitudes toward the European Union (EU) are increasingly interested in citizens’ basic predispositions, such as the “Big Five” personality traits. However, previous research on this particular relationship has failed to provide sound hypotheses and lacks consistent evidence. We propose that looking at specific facets of the Big Five offers a deeper understanding of the associations between personality predispositions, their measures, and EU attitudes. For this purpose, the 60-item Big Five Inventory-2, which explicitly measures Big Five domains and facets, was administered in a German population sample. We applied a variant of structural equation modeling and found that personality predispositions promoting communal and solidary behavior, cognitive elaboration, and a lower tendency to experience negative emotions predicted support for further European integration. Greater support of European integration might thus reflect, in part, basic psychological predispositions that facilitate adapting to the political, social, and cultural complexity posed by Europeanization. The study thus contributes to our understanding of deep-rooted patterns in thoughts and feelings that can shape citizens’ EU attitudes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aichholzer, J., D. Danner, and B. Rammstedt. 2018. Facets of personality and “ideological asymmetries”. Journal of Research in Personality 77: 90–100. Bakan, D. 1966. The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally. Bakker, B.N., and C.H. de Vreese. 2015. Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions. European Union Politics 17: 25–45. Bakker, B.N., and Y. Lelkes. 2018. Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics 80: 1311–1325. Boomgaarden, H.G., A.R. Schuck, M. Elenbaas, and C.H. de Vreese. 2011. Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics 12: 241–266. Chen, F.F., A. Hayes, C.S. Carver, J.P. Laurenceau, and Z. Zhang. 2012. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality 80: 219–251. Costa Jr., P.T., and R.R. McCrae. 1995. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 64: 21–50. Credé, M., P. Harms, S. Niehorster, and A. Gaye-Valentine. 2012. An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102: 874–888. Curtis, K.A. 2016. Personality’s effect on European identification. European Union Politics 17: 429–456. Curtis, K.A., and J.H. Nielsen. 2018. Predispositions matter… but how? Ideology as a mediator of personality’s effects on EU support in five countries. Political Psychology 39 (6): 1251–1270. Danner, D., B. Rammstedt, M. Bluemke, C. Lechner, S. Berres, T. Knopf, and O.P. John. 2019. Das Big Five Inventar 2: Validierung eines Persönlichkeitsinventars zur Erfassung von 5 Persönlichkeitsdomänen und 15 Facetten. Diagnostica 65: 121–132. Donnellan, M.B., F.L. Oswald, B.M. Baird, and R.E. Lucas. 2006. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment 18 (2): 192–203. Easton, D. 1975. A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457. Federico, C.M., and A. Malka. 2018. The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Advances in Political Psychology 39 (S1): 3–48. Gerber, A.S., G.A. Huber, D. Doherty, and C.M. Dowling. 2011. The Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 265–287. Hirsh, J.B., C.G. DeYoung, X. Xiaowen, and J.B. Peterson. 2010. Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36: 655–664. Hobolt, S.B., and C.E. de Vries. 2016. Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science 19: 413–432. Hu, L.T., and P.M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55. Jost, J. T. 2017. Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology 38: 167–208. McCrae, R.R. 2015. A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review 19: 97–112. Mõttus, R., J. Sinick, A. Terracciano, M. Hřebíčková, C. Kandler, J. Ando, and K.L. Jang. 2019. Personality characteristics below facets: A replication and meta-analysis of cross-rater agreement, rank-order stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 117: e35–e50. Nielsen, J.H. 2016. Personality and Euroscepticism: The impact of personality on attitudes towards the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 1175–1198. Nielsen, J.H. 2018. The effect of affect: How affective style determines attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics 19: 75–96. Onraet, E., A. Van Hiel, A. Roets, and I. Cornelis. 2011. The closed mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right-wing attitudes. European Journal of Personality 25: 184–197. Otjes, S., and A. Katsanidou. 2017. Beyond Kriesiland: EU integration as a super issue after the Eurocrisis. European Journal of Political Research 56: 301–319. Paunonen, S.V., and M.C. Ashton. 2001. Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 524–539. Saris, W.E., and M. Revilla. 2016. Correction for measurement errors in survey research: Necessary and possible. Social Indicators Research 127: 1005–1020. Schoen, H. 2007. Personality traits and foreign policy attitudes in German public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 408–430. Sibley, C.G., and J. Duckitt. 2010. Personality geneses of authoritarianism: the form and function of openness to experience. In Perspectives on authoritarianism, ed. F. Funke, T. Petzel, J.C. Cohrs, and J. Duckitt, 169–199. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Soto, C.J., and O.P. John. 2017. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113: 117–143. Westfall, J., and T. Yarkoni. 2016. Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS ONE 11 (3): e0152719.