Can scientific productivity impact the economic complexity of countries?

Scientometrics - Tập 120 Số 1 - Trang 267-282 - 2019
Henry Laverde-Rojas1, Juan C. Correa2
1Escuela de Negocios, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia
2Facultad de Psicología, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alonso-Borrego, C., & Arellano, M. (1999). Symmetrically normalized instrumental-variable estimation using panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(1), 36–49.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277–297.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

Babić, D., Kutlača, Đ., Živković, L., Štrbac, D., & Semenčenko, D. (2016). Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. Scientometrics, 106(1), 405–434.

Baek, S., Hwang, S., & Park, Y. I. (2018). Determinants of technology transfer and commercialization in national research and development: Focusing on Korea railroad research projects. Asian Journal of Innovation & Policy, 7(3), 438–456.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Temple, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models.

Breiman, L., & Friedman, J. (1982). Estimating optimal correlations for multiple regression and correlation. Technical Reports. Stanford University Technical Reports Orion 010.

Brito, S., Magud, M. N. E., & Sosa, M. S. (2018). Real exchange rates, economic complexity, and investment. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2014). Mapping triple helix innovation in developing and transitional economies: Webometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 99(1), 1–4.

Cimini, G., Gabrielli, A., & Labini, F. S. (2014). The scientific competitiveness of nations. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113470.

Clarke, K. A. (2007). A simple distribution-free test for nonnested model selection. Political Analysis, 15(3), 347–363.

Correa, J. C., & Jaffe, K. (2015). Corruption and wealth: Unveiling a national prosperity syndrome in Europe. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 3(3), 43–59.

Erfanian, E., & Neto, A. B. F. (2017). Scientific output: Labor or capital intensive? an analysis for selected countries. Scientometrics, 112(1), 461–482.

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Ohio: University of Akron Press.

Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the penn world table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–82.

Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Abdon, A., & Bacate, M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(1), 36–68.

González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389.

Guevara, M., & Mendoza, M. (2013). Revealing comparative advantages in the backbone of science. In Proceedings of the 2013 workshop on computational scientometrics: theory & applications, ACM, (pp. 31–36).

Guevara, M. R., Hartmann, D., Aristarán, M., Mendoza, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2016). The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1695–1709.

Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93.

Hatemi-J, A., Ajmi, A. N., El Montasser, G., Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Gupta, R. (2016). Research output and economic growth in g7 countries: New evidence from asymmetric panel causality testing. Applied Economics, 48(24), 2301–2308.

Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309–342.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A. & Yildirim, M. A. (2012). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development/MIT Media Lab.

Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575.

Inglesi-Lotz, R., Balcilar, M., & Gupta, R. (2014). Time-varying causality between research output and economic growth in US. Scientometrics, 100(1), 203–216.

Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2013). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. Scientometrics, 95(1), 129–139.

Jaffe, K. (2009). What is science? An interdisciplinary perspective. New York: University Press of America.

Jaffe, K. (2011). Do countries with lower self-citation rates produce higher impact papers? Or, does humility pay? Interciencia, 36(9), 694–698.

Jaffe, K., Caicedo, M., Manzanares, M., Gil, M., Rios, A., Florez, A., et al. (2013). Productivity in physical and chemical science predicts the future economic growth of developing countries better than other popular indices. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66239.

Javed, S. A., & Liu, S. (2018). Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: Application of even gm (1, 1) and ndgm models. Scientometrics, 115(1), 395–413.

Jurajda, Š., Kozubek, S., Münich, D., & Škoda, S. (2017). Scientific publication performance in post-communist countries: Still lagging far behind. Scientometrics, 112(1), 315–328.

Kumar, R. R., Stauvermann, P. J., & Patel, A. (2016). Exploring the link between research and economic growth: An empirical study of china and usa. Quality & Quantity, 50(3), 1073–1091.

Kutlača, D., Babić, D., Živković, L., & Štrbac, D. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of see countries scientific output. Scientometrics, 102(1), 247–265.

Laverde-Rojas, H., Correa, J. C., Jaffe, K., & Caicedo, M. I. (2019). Are average years of education losing predictive power for economic growth? An alternative measure through structural equations modeling. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213651.

Nguyen, T. V., & Pham, L. T. (2011). Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 89(1), 107–117.

Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297–309.

Roodman, D. (2009a). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

Roodman, D. (2009b). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

Simoes, A. J. G., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The economic complexity observatory: An analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. AAAI Workshops, North America, Aug. 2011. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW11/paper/view/3948/4325 . Accessed 1 May 2019.

Solarin, S. A., & Yen, Y. Y. (2016). A global analysis of the impact of research output on economic growth. Scientometrics, 108(2), 855–874.

Suarez, R. K. (2014). Precious papers from ’non-research-intensive’ countries. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 217, 818–819.

Sweet, C. M., & Maggio, D. S. E. (2015). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Development, 66, 665–677.

Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., & Pietronero, L. (2012). A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Scientific Reports, 2, 723.

Vinkler, P. (2018). Structure of the scientific research and science policy. Scientometrics, 114(2), 737–756.

Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step gmm estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51.

Wong, C. Y., & Fung, H. N. (2017). Science-technology-industry correlative indicators for policy targeting on emerging technologies: Exploring the core competencies and promising industries of aspirant economies. Scientometrics, 111(2), 841–867.

Yeats, A. J. (1985). On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: Implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 121(1), 61–73.

Zaccaria, A., Cristelli, M., Kupers, R., Tacchella, A., & Pietronero, L. (2016). A case study for a new metrics for economic complexity: The netherlands. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 11(1), 151–169.