Can overconfidence explain the consumption hump?

Journal of Economics and Finance - Tập 35 - Trang 41-70 - 2009
Shantanu Bagchi1
1Applied Economics Department, Utah State University, Logan, USA

Tóm tắt

The standard neoclassical life-cycle model predicts that individual consumption should either increase, remain constant or fall monotonically depending on whether the market rate of return on savings is greater than, equal to or less than the discount rate. However, empirical evidence suggests that even after controlling for economic growth and family size, household consumption exhibits a robust hump at around age 45–55, with the ratio of peak consumption to consumption when entering the workforce greater than 1.1. This paper extends the “overconfidence” explanation (Caliendo and Huang, J. Macroecon 30(4):1347–1369, 2008) of this macroeconomic puzzle to a calibrated general equilibrium environment. The main finding is that although it is possible to identify parameter values under which overconfidence alone generates life-cycle consumption profiles and macro-indicators consistent with U.S. experience, quite extreme assumptions about both the magnitude and distribution of overconfidence in the population are generally required to obtain them.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agarwal S (2007) The impact of homeowners’ housing wealth misestimation on consumption and saving decisions. Real Estate Econ 35(2):135–154 Attanasio OP, Browning M (1995) Consumption over the life cycle and over the business cycle. Am Econ Rev 85(5):1118–1137 Barber BM, Odean T (2000) Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock investment performance of individual investors. J Finance 55(2):773–806 Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Q J Econ 116(1):261–292 Bertaut C, Starr-McCluer M (2000) Household portfolios in the United States. Federal reserve board of Governers working paper Browning M, Ejrnæs M (2009) Consumption and children. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):93–111 Browning M, Deaton A, Irish M (1985) A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle. Econometrica 53(3):503–544 Brunnermeier MK, Parker JA (2005) Optimal expectations. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1092–1118 Bucciol A (2007) Temptation toward consumption and life-cycle behaviour. SSRN eLibrary Bucciol A (2008) Social security, dynamic efficiency and self-control problems. SSRN eLibrary Bullard J, Feigenbaum J (2007) A leisurely reading of the life-cycle consumption data. J Monet Econ 54(8):2305–2320 Bütler M (2001) Neoclassical life-cycle consumption. Econ Theory 17:209–221 Caliendo FN (2008) Is social security behind the collapse of personal saving?: a general equilibrium approach. Working paper Caliendo FN, Aadland D (2007) Short-term planning and the life-cycle consumption puzzle. J Econ Dyn Control 31:1392–1415 Caliendo FN, Gahramanov E (2009) Hunting the unobservables for optimal social security: a general equilibrium approach. Public Finance Rev (in press) Caliendo FN, Huang KXD (2008) Overconfidence and consumption over the life cycle. J Macroecon 30(4):1347–1369 Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1990) Permanent income, current income, and consumption. J Bus Econ Stat 8(3):265–279 Carroll CD (1997) Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Q J Econ 112(1):1–55 Carroll CD (2000) Why do the rich save so much? In: Slemrod JB (ed) Does atlas shrug? the economic consequences of taxing the rich. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Carroll CD, Summers LH (1991) Consumption growth parallels income growth: some new evidence. In: Douglas B, Shoven J (eds) National saving and economic performance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Deaves R, Lüders E, Schröder M (2005) The dynamics of overconfidence: evidence from stock market forecasters. Center for European economic research discussion paper 05-83 Feigenbaum J (2007) Precautionary saving unfettered. Working paper Feigenbaum J (2008) Can mortality risk explain the consumption hump? J Macroecon 30(3):844–872 Feldstein M (1985) The optimal level of social security benefits. Q J Econ 100(2):303–320 Fernández-Villaverde J, Krueger D (2002) Consumption and saving over the life cycle: how important are consumer durables? Stanford Institute for economic policy research discussion paper 01-34 Fernández-Villaverde J, Krueger D (2007) Consumption over the life cycle: facts from consumer expenditure survey data. Rev Econ Stat 89(3):552–565 Findley TS, Caliendo FN (2009) Short horizons, time inconsistency, and optimal social security. Int Tax Public Financ (in press) Fisher KL, Statman M (2002) Bubble expectations. J Wealth Manag 5(2):17–22 Gale WG, Phillips JWR (2006) Pensions, social security, wealth and lifetime earnings: evidence from the health and retirement study. Center for retirement research working paper Gervais S, Odean T (2001) Learning to be overconfident. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):1–27 Gordon RH (1985) Taxation of corporate capital income: tax revenues versus tax distortions. Q J Econ 100(1):1–27 Gourinchas PO, Parker JA (2002) Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica 70(1):47–89 Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2001) Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69(6):1403–1435 Hansen LP, Heckman JJ (1996) The empirical foundations of calibration. J Econ Perspect 10(1):87–104 Heckman JJ (1974) Life cycle consumption and labor supply: an explanation of the relationship between income and consumption over the life cycle. Am Econ Rev 64(1):188–194 Huang K, Caliendo FN (2007) Rationalizing seven consumption-saving puzzles in a unified framework. Working paper Hubbard J, Michaely R (1997) Do investors ignore dividend taxation? a reexamination of the citizens utilities case. J Financ Quant Anal 32(1):117–135 Hubbard R, Skinner J, Zeldes S (1994) The importance of precautionary motives in explaining individual and aggregate saving. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 40:59–125 Hvide HK (2002) Pragmatic beliefs and overconfidence. J Econ Behav Organ 48(1):15–28 İmrohoroğlu A, İmrohoroğlu S, Joines DH (2003) Time-inconsistent preferences and social security. Q J Econ 118(2):745–784 Johnson RW, Burman LE, Kobes DI (2004) Annuitized wealth at older ages: evidence from the health and retirement study. Final report to the employee benefits security administration US Department of Labor Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112(2):443–477 Nagatani K (1972) Life cycle saving: theory and fact. Am Econ Rev 62(3):344–353 Park HS (2008) Bounded rationality and lifecycle consumption: a general equilibrium model with short term planning. Working paper Ríos-Rull JV (1996) Life-cycle economies and aggregate fluctuations. Rev Econ Stud 63(3):465–489 Shapiro MD, Slemrod JB (1995) Consumer response to the timing of income: evidence from a change in tax withholding. Am Econ Rev 85(1):274–283 Siegel JJ (1999) The shrinking equity premium: historical facts and future forecasts. J Portf Manage (Fall):10–17 Thurow LC (1969) The optimum lifetime distribution of consumption expenditures. Am Econ Rev 59(3):324–330 Yaari ME (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life Insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Rev Econ Stud 32(2):137–150