Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?

Ahn TK, Isaac MR, Salmon TC (2009) Rent seeking in groups. Working Paper

Baharad E, Nitzan S (2008) Contest efforts in light of behavioral considerations. Econ J 118: 2047–2059

Baker RJ, Laury SK, Williams AW (2008) Comparing small-group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments. South Econ J 75: 367–382

Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (2005) Risk preference instability across institutions: a dilemma. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, vol 11, pp 4209–4214

Borgers T, Dustmann C (2005) Strange bids: bidding behavior in the United Kingdom’s third generation spectrum auction. Econ J 115: 551–578

Brady MP, Wu SY (2008) The effect of intragroup communication on preference shifts in groups. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Working Paper

Casari M, Zhang J, Jackson C (2009) Do groups fall prey to the winner’s curse? Purdue University, Working Paper

Cason TN, Mui VL (1997) A laboratory study of group polarization in the team dictator game. Econ J 107: 1465–1483

Charness G, Karni E, Levin D (2007) Individual and group decision making under risk: an experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. J Risk Uncertain 35: 129–148

Charness G, Karni E, Levin D (2009) On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence. Games Econ Behav (forthcoming)

Chau A, Phillips J (1995) Effects of perceived control upon wagering and attributions in computer blackjack. J Gen Psychol 122: 253–269

Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 591–621

Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2005) Are two heads better than one? team versus individual play in signaling games. Am Econ Rev 95: 477–509

Cornes R, Hartley R (2005) Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Econ Theory 26: 923–946

Cox J, Hayne S (2005) When does free riding promote rational bidding?. In: Zwick R, Rapoport A (eds) Experimental business research, vol II. Springer, Berlin

Cox J, Hayne S (2006) Barking up the right tree: are small groups rational agents. Exp Econ 9: 209–222

Cox JC, Smith VL, Walker JM (1988) Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. J Risk Uncertain 1: 61–99

Croson R, Sundali J (2005) The Gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: empirical data from Casinos. J Risk Uncertain 30: 195–209

D’Avolio G (2002) The market for borrowing stock. J Financ Econ 66: 271–306

Davis JH (1992) Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: selected examples, 1950–1990. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52: 3–38

Davis D, Reilly R (1998) Do many cooks always spoil the stew? an experimental analysis of rent seeking and the role of a strategic buyer. Public Choice 95: 89–115

Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10: 171–178

Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: on the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychol 17: 295–314

Gneezy U, Smorodinsky R (2006) All-pay auctions–an experimental study. J Econ Behav Organ 61: 255–275

Goeree J, Holt C, Palfrey T (2002) Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J Econ Theory 104: 247–272

Harrison G, Lau M, Rutstrom E, Tarazona-Gómez M (2005) Preferences over social risk. Working Paper

Hazlett TW, Michaels RJ (1993) The cost of rent-seeking: evidence from cellular telephone license lotteries. South Econ J 59: 425–435

Hillman AL, Katz E (1984) Risk-averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power. Econ J 94: 104–110

Hoffman E, Marsden J, Saidi R (1991) Are joint bidding and competitive common value auctions markets compatible—some evidence from offshore oil auctions. J Environ Econ Manag 20: 99–112

Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am Econ Rev 92: 1644–1655

Kerr NL, MacCoun RJ, Kramer GP (1996) Bias in judgment: comparing individuals and groups. Psychol Rev 103: 687–719

Kiesler S, Lee S (1992) Group decision making and communication technology. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52: 96–123

Kocher MG, Sutter M (2005) The decision maker matters: individual versus group behavior in experimental beauty-contest games. Econ J 115: 200–223

Kocher MG, Sutter M, Strauss S (2006) Individual decision-making—causes and consequences of self-selection. Games Econ Behav 56: 259–270

Laughlin PR, Bonner BL, Miner AG (2002) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters- to-numbers problems. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 61: 94–107

Laughlin PR, Zander ML, Knievel EM, Tan TK (2003) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: informative equations and effective strategies. J Pers Soc Psychol 85: 684–694

Masclet D, Loheac Y, Laurent D-B, Colombier N (2009) Group and individual risk preferences : a lottery-choice experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 70: 470–484

Millner EL, Pratt MD (1989) An experimental investigation of efficient rent-seeking. Public Choice 62: 139–151

Millner EL, Pratt MD (1991) Risk aversion and rent-seeking: an extension and some experimental evidence. Public Choice 69: 81–92

Parco J, Rapoport A, Amaldoss W (2005) Two-stage contests with budget constraints: an experimental study. J Math Psychol 49: 320–338

Potters JC, De Vries CG, Van Winden F (1998) An experimental examination of rational rent seeking. Eur J Political Econ 14: 783–800

Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A, Mathauschek B (2007) Teams take the better risks. J Econ Behav Organ 63: 412–422

Schmidt D, Shupp R, Walker J (2006) Resource allocation contests: experimental evidence. Indiana University, Working Paper

Sheremeta RM (2009a) Contest design: an experimental investigation. Econ Inq (forthcoming)

Sheremeta RM (2009b) Experimental comparison of multi-stage and one-stage contests. Games Econ Behav (forthcoming)

Sheremeta RM (2009c) Perfect-substitutes, best-shot, and weakest-link contests between groups. Purdue University, Working Paper

Shupp RS, Williams AW (2008) Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals. Econ J 118: 258–283

Stasser G, Dietz-Uhler B (2001) Collective choice, judgment, and problem solving. In: Hogg MA, Tindale RS (eds) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 31–55

Steiner ID (1972) Group processes and productivity. Academic Press, New York

Sutter M (2005) Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different sizes. Econ Lett 88: 41–46

Sutter M (2007) Are teams prone to myopic loss aversion? an experimental study on individual versus team investment behavior. Econ Lett 97: 128–132

Sutter M, Kocher MG, Strauss S (2009) Individuals and teams in auctions. Oxf Econ Pap 61: 380–394

Szidarovszky F, Okuguchi K (1997) On the existence and uniqueness of pure nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games. Games Econ Behav 18: 135–140

Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, pp 97–112

Zhang J, Casari M (2009) How groups reach agreement in risky choices: an experiment. McMaster University, Working Paper