Can competing demands affect pro-environmental behaviour: a study of the impact of exposure to partly related sequential experiments

Andersson, 2010, Differentiation of determinants of low-cost and high-cost recycling, J. Environ. Psychol., 30, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.003 Asensio, 2015, Nonprice incentives and energy conservation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 112, 10.1073/pnas.1401880112 Bhat, 2001, Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transp. Res. B Methodol., 35, 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X Bliemer, 2010, Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations, Transp. Res. B Methodol., 44, 720, 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004 Brick, 2017, “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior, J. Environ. Psychol., 51, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.004 Brunner, 2018, Carbon label at a university restaurant – label implementation and evaluation, Ecol. Econ., 146, 658, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.012 Capaldi, 2016, Seeing and being green? The effect of money priming on willingness to perform sustainable actions, social connectedness, and Prosociality, J. Soc. Psychol., 156, 10.1080/00224545.2015.1047438 Čapienė, 2021, Pro-environmental and pro-social engagement in sustainable consumption: exploratory study, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 1 Carrico, 2018, Putting your money where your mouth is: an experimental test of pro-environmental spillover from reducing meat consumption to monetary donations, Environ. Behav., 50, 10.1177/0013916517713067 Concu, 2009, Measuring environmental externality spillovers through choice modelling, Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space, 41, 199, 10.1068/a39266 Cooper, 2008, Learning and transfer in signaling games, Economic Theory, 34, 10.1007/s00199-006-0192-5 d’Adda, 2022, A randomized trial of energy cost information provision alongside energy-efficiency classes for refrigerator purchases, Nat. Energy, 7, 10.1038/s41560-022-01002-z Dekker, 2014, Changing with the tide: semiparametric estimation of preference dynamics, Land Econ., 10.3368/le.90.4.717 Department for Transport, 2023 Diekmann, 2003, Green and greenback: the behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations, Ration. Soc., 15, 10.1177/1043463103154002 Donmez-Turan, 2021, The analysis of pro-environmental behaviour based on ecological worldviews, environmental training/ knowledge and goal frames, J. Clean. Prod., 279, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123518 Emberger-Klein, 2018, The effect of information provision on supermarket consumers’ use of and preferences for carbon labels in Germany, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 253, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.105 Epley, 2006, The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: why the adjustments are insufficient, Psychol. Sci., 17, 311, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x Galdeano-Gómez, 2008, Environmental performance and spillover effects on productivity: evidence from horticultural firms, J. Environ. Manag., 88, 1552, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.028 Geiger, 2021, More green than gray? Toward a sustainable overview of environmental spillover effects: a Bayesian meta-analysis. In, J. Environ. Psychol., 78, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101694 Gneezy, 2012, Paying to be nice: consistency and costly prosocial behavior, Manag. Sci., 58 Greene, 2014, Models for ordered choices Hess, 2019, Apollo: a flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application, J. Choice Model., 32, 10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170 Ho, 2020, Public preferences for mobility as a service: insights from stated preference surveys, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.031 Holmgren, 2019, Deceptive sustainability: cognitive bias in people’s judgment of the benefits of CO2 emission cuts, J. Environ. Psychol., 64, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.005 Ivanova, 2020, Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589 Keuschnigg, 2018, Thou shalt recycle: how social norms of environmental protection narrow the scope of the low-cost hypothesis, Environ. Behav., 50, 10.1177/0013916517726569 Kim, 2020, Predicting environmentally friendly eating out behavior by value-attitude-behavior theory: does being vegetarian reduce food waste?, J. Sustain. Tour., 28, 10.1080/09669582.2019.1705461 Klöckner, 2013, A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour-a meta-analysis, Glob. Environ. Chang., 23, 1028, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014 Lange, 2019, Measuring pro-environmental behavior: review and recommendations, J. Environ. Psychol., 63, 92, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009 Lange, 2023, Validity and scope sensitivity of the work for environmental protection task, J. Environ. Psychol., 86, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101967 Lindenberg, 2007, Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior, J. Soc. Issues, 63, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x Louviere, 2000 Lv, 2021, How financial development affects CO2 emissions: a spatial econometric analysis, J. Environ. Manag., 277, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111397 Maki, 2019, Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover, Nat. Sustainabil., 2, 307, 10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9 Margetts, 2017, Spillover between pro-environmental behaviours: the role of resources and perceived similarity, J. Environ. Psychol., 49, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.005 Mariel, 2021 Marshack, 1960, Binary choice constraint and random utility indicators McFadden, 1973, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, 105 Nilsson, 2016, Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda, 23, 573 Ran, 2022, Information as an enabler of sustainable food choices: a behavioural approach to understanding consumer decision-making, Sustain. Product. Consumpt., 31, 642, 10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.026 Reichl, 2021, The drivers of individual climate actions in Europe, Glob. Environ. Chang., 71, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102390 Rodemeier, 2021, The welfare effects of persuasion and taxation: theory and evidence from the field, SSRN Electron. J. Rondoni, 2021, Consumers behaviour towards carbon footprint labels on food: a review of the literature and discussion of industry implications, J. Clean. Prod., 301, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127031 Rose, 2014, Stated choice experimental design theory: The who, the what and the why, 152 Rosenfeld, 2018, The psychology of vegetarianism: recent advances and future directions, In Appetite, 131, 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011 Said, 2022, Interdependence in active mobility adoption: joint modeling and motivational spillover in walking, cycling and bike-sharing, Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 16, 422, 10.1080/15568318.2021.1885769 Sausgruber, 2005, Testing the mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion, Public Choice, 122 Soregaroli, 2021, Carbon footprint information, prices, and restaurant wine choices by customers: a natural field experiment, Ecol. Econ., 186, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107061 Stajkovic, 2022, The money priming debate revisited: a review, meta-analysis, and extension to organizations, J. Organ. Behav., 43, 10.1002/job.2619 Thøgersen, 2004, A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior, J. Environ. Psychol., 24, 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2 Thøgersen, 2003, Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour, J. Environ. Psychol., 23, 225, 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5 Thomas, 2016, The welsh single-use carrier bag charge and behavioural spillover, J. Environ. Psychol., 47, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.008 Thoøgersen, 1999, Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern, J. Econ. Psychol., 20, 53, 10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9 Train, 2009, Discrete choice methods with simulation, second edition, vol. 9780521766 Truelove, 2018, Perception of pro-environmental behavior, Glob. Environ. Chang., 49, 175, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009 Truelove, 2012, Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors, J. Environ. Psychol., 32, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002 Truelove, 2014, Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and theoretical framework, Glob. Environ. Chang., 29, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004 Tversky, 1974, Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 UNDP United Nations United Nations Environment Programme van der Werff, 2014, Follow the signal: when past pro-environmental actions signal who you are, J. Environ. Psychol., 40, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004 Verain, 2015, Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment?, Appetite, 91, 375, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.055 Vesely, 2018, Global social norms and environmental behavior, Environ. Behav., 50, 10.1177/0013916517702190 Vesely, 2020, Social desirability in environmental psychology research: three meta-analyses, Front. Psychol., 11, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395 Wolske, 2018, Accelerating demand for residential solar photovoltaics: can simple framing strategies increase consumer interest?, Glob. Environ. Chang., 53, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.005 Wynes, 2020, How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions?, Clim. Chang., 162, 10.1007/s10584-020-02811-5 Yang, 2023, Do consumers care about environmentally sustainable attributes along the food supply chain? —a systematic literature review, AIMS Agricult. Food, 8, 513, 10.3934/agrfood.2023027 Zheng, 2021, Does ecological compensation have a spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from China based on a multi-stage dynamic DID approach, J. Environ. Manag., 294, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112934