Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America

World Development - Tập 33 Số 2 - Trang 237-253 - 2005
Stefano Pagiola1, Agustin Arcenas1, Gunārs Platais1
1The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alderman, 1998, The potential and limitations of self-targeted food subsidies, World Bank Research Observer, 13, 213, 10.1093/wbro/13.2.213

Alix, 2003

Barret, 2003, How Accurate is food-for-work self-targeting in the presence of imperfect factor markets? Evidence from Ethiopia, Journal of Development Studies, 39, 152, 10.1080/00220380412331333189

Besley, 1993, The principles of targeting

Bigman, 2000, Geographical targeting for poverty alleviation: an introduction to the special issue, The World Bank Economic Review, 14, 129, 10.1093/wber/14.1.129

Bulas, J. M. (2004). Implementing cost recovery for environmental services in Mexico. Paper presented at World Bank Water Week, Washington, DC, February 24–26, 2004

Carter, 1984, Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical analysis of peasant agriculture production, Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 131, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041621

Castro, E. (2001). Costarrican experience in the charge for hydro environmental services of the biodiversity to finance conservation and recuperation of hillside ecosystems. Paper presented at the international workshop on market creation for biodiversity products and services, OECD, Paris, January 25–26, 2001

CGIAR (1997), Report of the study on CGIAR research priorities for marginal lands. Rome, Italy: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Coady, 2004, Targeting outcomes redux, World Bank Research Observer, 19, 61, 10.1093/wbro/lkh016

Coase, 1960, The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1, 10.1086/466560

Cordero, D. (2003). Tarifa de agua basada en costo de protección de cuencas, en Heredia. Heredia, Costa Rica: Empresa de Servicios Públicos de Heredia (ESPH)

Echevarrı́a, 2002, Financing watershed conservation: The FONAG water fund in Quito, Ecuador, 91

Echevarrı́a, 2002

Echavarrı́a, 2002

FAO (2001). State of the World’s Forests 2001. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)

FONAFIFO (2000). El desarrollo del sistema de pago de servicios ambientales en Costa Rica. San José, Costa Rica: Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO)

2001

Gobbi, 2002

Heath, 1996, Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced: The case of Colombia, Environment and Development Economics, 1, 65, 10.1017/S1355770X00000383

Herrador, D., Dimas, L. A., & Méndez, V. E. (2002). Pago por servicios ambientales en El Salvador: Oportunidades y riesgos para pequeños agricultores y comunidades rurales. FORD Foundation Payment for Environmental Services in the Americas Project. San Salvador, El Salvador: Fundación PRISMA

Jaramillo, 2003

Kerr, 2002, Sharing the benefits of watershed management in Sukhomajri, India, 63

Kerr, 2002, Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India, World Development, 30, 1387, 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00042-6

Landell-Mills, 2002

Lloret Zamora, 2002

Miranda, 2003

Muñoz, 2004

Nelson, 2002

Nowak, 1987, The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: economic and diffusion explanations, Rural Sociology, 52, 208

Ortiz Malavasi, 2003

Pagiola, 1999

Pagiola, 2002, Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica, 37

Pagiola, 2002, Making market-based mechanisms work for forests and people, 261

Pagiola, S., Martin-Hurtado, R., Shyamsundar, P., Mani, M., & Silva, P. (2002). Generating public sector resources to finance sustainable development: revenue and incentive effects. World Bank Technical Paper No. 538. Washington, DC: World Bank

Pagiola, S., & Platais, G., (forthcoming). Payments for environmental services: from theory to practice. Initial lessons of experience. Washington, DC: World Bank

Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., Ramı́rez, E., Rosales, M., & Ruı́z, J.-P. (2004). Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes. Environment Department Paper No. 96. Washington, DC: World Bank

Pattanayak, 2003, Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies, Agroforestry Systems, 57, 173, 10.1023/A:1024809108210

REECS (2003). Developing pro-poor markets for environmental services in the Philippines. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)

Rojas, 2002

Scherr, 1995, Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: patterns observed in western Kenya, World Development, 23, 787, 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00005-W

Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., & Strappazzon, L. (2002). Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria’ BushTender Trial. Paper presented at the 46th Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Conference, Canberra, February 13–15, 2003

Tomich, 1995

Weitzman, 1974, Prices vs. quantities, The Review of Economic Studies, 41, 477, 10.2307/2296698

World Bank (2000). Ecomarkets project: project appraisal document. Report No. 20434-CR. Washington, DC: World Bank

World Bank (2002). Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua regional integrated silvopastoral approaches to ecosystem management project: project appraisal document. Report No. 21869-LAC. Washington, DC: World Bank

World Bank (2003). Guatemala Western Altiplano natural resources management project: project appraisal document. Report No. 25660-GUA. Washington, DC: World Bank