Caecum perforation after renal transplantation: a case report and review of literature

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 46 - Trang 1141-1144 - 2013
David N. Gachoka1, Shipeng Yu1, Dinkar Kaw2
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, USA
2Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, USA

Tóm tắt

Gastrointestinal (GI) complication used to be the second most common complication in renal transplant patients after infection (Bardaxoglou et al. in Transpl Int 6(3):148–152, 1993). Review of transplant registry reveals that GI complication is no longer the second most common type of complication after renal transplant, but that it is still a common cause of significant amount of deaths in renal transplant recipients (De Bartolomeis et al. in Transpl Proc 37(6):2504–2506, 2005). In a study of 1,515 adults with severe GI complication after renal transplant, Sarkio et al. (Transpl Int 17(9):505–510, 2004) reported that gastroduodenal ulcers followed by colon perforation were the two biggest groups of GI complications during the first year after renal transplantation. Colonic perforation is estimated to occur in about 1 % of all cases of renal transplant patients, and it does predispose to potentially fatal complication. About 50 % of all colonic perforation is due to complication of acute inflammation of diverticular disease (Bardaxoglou et al. in Transpl Int 6(3):148–152, 1993; Guice et al. in Am J Surg 138(1):43–48, 1979; Koneru et al. in Arch Surg 125(5):610–613, 1990; Coccolini et al. in Transpl Proc 41(4):1189–1190, 2009). This is particularly so because these patients were previously exposed to uremia before transplantation which alters their protein metabolism hence interfering with tissue healing there after (Carson et al. in Ann Surg 188(1):109–113, 1978). GI complications including colon perforation after renal transplantation have effect on a patient’s long-term survival (Gil-Vernet et al. in Transpl Proc 39(7):2190–2193, 2007). Despite this, the role of renal transplantation medication compared to anatomic anomaly in GI complication has been equivocal.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bardaxoglou E, Maddern G, Ruso L, Siriser F, Campion JP, Le Pogamp P et al (1993) Gastrointestinal surgical emergencies following kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 6(3):148–152 De Bartolomeis C, Collini A, Barni R, Ruggieri G, Bernini M, Carmellini M (2005) Cytomegalovirus infection with multiple colonic perforations in a renal transplant recipient. Transpl Proc 37(6):2504–2506 Sarkio S, Halme L, Kyllonen L, Salmela K (2004) Severe gastrointestinal complications after 1,515 adult kidney transplantations. Transpl Int 17(9):505–510 Guice K, Rattazzi LC, Marchioro TL (1979) Colon perforation in renal transplant patients. Am J Surg 138(1):43–48 Koneru B, Selby R, O’Hair DP, Tzakis AG, Hakala TR, Starzl TE (1990) Nonobstructing colonic dilatation and colon perforations following renal transplantation. Arch Surg 125(5):610–613 Coccolini F, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Ansaloni L, Faenza A, Pinna AD (2009) Colonic perforation after renal transplantation: risk factor analysis. Transpl Proc 41(4):1189–1190 Carson SD, Krom RA, Uchida K, Yokota K, West JC, Weil R 3rd (1978) Colon perforation after kidney transplantation. Ann Surg 188(1):109–113 Gil-Vernet S, Amado A, Ortega F, Alarcon A, Bernal G, Capdevila L et al (2007) Gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant recipients: MITOS study. Transpl Proc 39(7):2190–2193 Rigotti P, Van Buren CT, Payne WD, Peters C, Kahan BD (1986) Gastrointestinal perforations in renal transplant recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporin. World J Surg 10(1):137–141 Stelzner M, Vlahakos DV, Milford EL, Tilney NL (1997) Colonic perforations after renal transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 184(1):63–69 Mayer AD, Dmitrewski J, Squifflet JP, Besse T, Grabensee B, Klein B et al (1997) Multicenter randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in the prevention of renal allograft rejection: a report of the European Tacrolimus Multicenter Renal Study Group. Transplantation 64(3):436–443