CPM2: A Core Model for Product Data

Steven J. Fenves1,2, Sebti Foufou3,4, Conrad Bock5, Ram D. Sriram5
1Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
2Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263
3LE2i Laboratory, University of Burgundy, B.P. 47870, 21078 Dijon, France
4LE2i Laboratory, University of Burgundy, B.P. 47870, 21078 Dijon, France; Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263
5Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263

Tóm tắt

The initial core product model (CPM), developed at NIST for the support of in-house research projects, has been extended to create CPM2, intended to support a broad range of information relevant to product lifecycle management. CPM2 is a generic, abstract model with generic semantics. CPM2 gives equal status to three aspects of a product or artifact: its function, its form, and its behavior. Thus, CPM2 can support functional reasoning about a product in the conceptual stages of design, the recording and the modeling of its behavior in the postdesign stages as well as the “traditional” design phases. Three levels of CPM2 models, de-noted as the conceptual, intermediate, and implementation models, are described. Extensions of the initial CPM are briefly pre-sented. The facilities in CPM2 for building experimental intermediate systems are demonstrated and a short illustrative example is given. The full practical evaluation of CPM2 will require the development and use of implementation models.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Shooter, A Model for the Flow of Design Information in Product Development, Eng. Comput., 16, 178, 10.1007/s003660070004

Szykman, A Foundation for Interoperability in Next-Generation Product Development Systems, Comput.-Aided Des., 33, 545, 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00053-7

Fenves, S. J. , 2001, “A Core Product Model for Representing Design Information,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report No. NISTIR 6736, Gaithersburg, MD.

Fenves, S., Foufou, S., Bock, C., Bouillon, N., and Sriram, R. D., 2004, “CPM2: A Revised Core Product Model for Representing Design Information,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report No. NISTIR 7185, Gaithersburg, MD.

Kemmerer, S. , 1999, “STEP: The Grand Experience,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication No. 939, Gaithersburg, MD.

PDES, STEP Success Stories, PDES Inc. Presentation, 1999, http://pdesinc.aticorp.org/success_stories.ppt.

ISO 10303-203, 1994, “Product Data Representation and Exchange-AP 203: Configuration Controlled Design,” Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 10303-1, 1994, “Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles,” Geneva, Switzerland.

Bock, Systems Engineering in the Product Lifecycle, International Journal of Product Development, 2, 123

OMG, SYSML, 2006, “Systems Modeling Language,” http://www.sysml.org/.

OMG, UML 2.0, 2003, “Superstructure Specification,” http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/03-08-02.

MOKA, 1999, “A Framework for Structuring and Representing Engineering Knowledge,” http://www.kbe.coventry.ac.uk/moka/miginfo.htm.

Chen, The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data, ACM Trans. Database. Sys., 1, 9, 10.1145/320434.320440

Booch, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide

Verrijn-Stuart, A. A. , 2001, “FRISCO—A Framework of Information System Concepts—The Revised FRISCO Report,” Draft Jan. 2001, IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO.

Szykman, A Web-Based System for Design Artifact Modeling, Des. Stud., 21, 145, 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00044-7

Allen, Representing the Charters of Freedom Encasements in a Decision Repository: A Case Study, Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

OMG, 2004, Model-Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/mda/.

Bock, UML Without Pictures, IEEE Software, 20, 33, 10.1109/MS.2003.1231148

Sudarsan, A Model for Capturing Product Assembly Information, ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 6, 11, 10.1115/1.2164451

Sudarsan, R., Young-Hyun, H., Feng, S. C., Roy, U., Fujun, W., Sriram, R. D., and Lyons, K. W., 2003, “Object-Oriented Representation of Electro-Mechanical Assemblies Using UML,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report No. NISTIR 7057, Gaithersburg, MD.

Patil, Ontology-Based Exchange of Product Data Semantics, IEEE. Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 2, 213, 10.1109/TASE.2005.849087

Fenves, S. J., Choi, Y., Gurumoorthy, B., Mocko, G., and Sriram, R. D., 2003, “Master Product Model for the Support of Tighter Design-Analysis Integration,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report No. NISTIR 7004, Gaithersburg, MD.

Wang, Towards Modeling the Evolution of Product Families, Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 10.1115/DETC2003/CIE-48216

Biswas, Representation of Heterogeneous Material Properties in the Core Product Model, Eng. Comput., 24, 43, 10.1007/s00366-007-0065-y

Xu, Toward Computer-Aided Conceptual Design of Mechatronic Devices With Multiple Interaction-States, Proceedings of the DETC 2005 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 10.1115/DETC2005-85410

Zha, A Feature-Based Approach to Embedded System Hardware and Software Co-Design, Proceedings of the DETC 2005 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 10.1115/DETC2005-85582

Ingward, B., Falk, M., Edwin, S., and Erik, M., 2002, “Project iViP: Integrated Virtual Product Creation Final Report,” K.Frank-Lothar, T.Trac, and A.Irich, eds., Organisation Responsible for Production and Manufacturing Technologies (PFT), Research Centre Karlsruhe GmbH, Germany.

Marquardt, Workflow and Information Centered Support of Design Processes, Comput. Chem. Eng., 29, 65, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.07.018