COVID-19 and lockdown schooling: how digital learning environments influence semantic structures and sustainability knowledge

Rieckmann M. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing; 2017. UNSD. The sustainable development goals report 2017. New York: UN; 2017. Singer-Brodowski M, Brock A, Etzkorn N, et al. Monitoring of education for sustainable development in Germany – insights from early childhood education, school and higher education. Environ Educ Res. 2019;25:492–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1440380. Brundtland GH. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. WCED; 1987. Imran S, Alam K, Beaumont N. Reinterpreting the definition of sustainable development for a more ecocentric reorientation. Sust Dev. 2014;22:134–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.537. Sund P, Gericke N. Teaching contributions from secondary school subject areas to education for sustainable development—a comparative study of science, social science and language teachers. Environ Educ Res. 2020;26:772–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1754341. DETR Report. Sustainable development: What it is and what you can do? DETR Green Ministers Report; 2000. UNESCO. Framework for the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) beyond 2019. Paris: UNESCO General Conference; 2019. Salovaara JJ, Pietikäinen J, Cantell H. Perceptions of interconnected sustainability: Students’ narratives bridging transition and education. J Clean Prod. 2021;281: 125336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125336. Geiger SM, Dombois C, Funke J. The role of environmental knowledge and attitude: Predictors for ecological behavior across cultures. An analysis of argentinean and german students. Umweltpsychologie. 2018;22: 69–87. Faize FA, Akhtar M. Addressing environmental knowledge and environmental attitude in undergraduate students through scientific argumentation. J Clean Prod. 2020;252: 119928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119928. Roczen N, Kaiser FG, Bogner FX, et al. A Competence model for environmental education. Environ Behav. 2014;46:972–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416. Liefländer AK, Bogner FX. Educational impact on the relationship of environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environ Educ Res. 2018;24:611–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1188265. Maurer M, Koulouris P, Bogner FX. Green awareness in action—how energy conservation action forces on environmental knowledge, values and behaviour in adolescents’ school life. Sustainability. 2020;12:955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030955. Keselman A, Levin DM, Hundal S, et al. Teaching environmental health science for informed citizenship in the science classroom and afterschool clubs. Int J Sci Soc. 2012;3:31–44. https://doi.org/10.18848/1836-6236/CGP/v03i03/51346. Kowasch M, Lippe DF. Moral impasses in sustainability education? Empirical results from school geography in Austria and Germany. Environ Educ Res. 2019;25:1066–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1557112. European Commission. From Farm To Fork: The European Green Deal, 2019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF United Nations. Report on the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit; 2019. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/cas_report_11_dec_0.pdf. Burns EA. Placing regenerative farming on environmental educators’ horizons. Austr J Environ Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.21. Caird S, Lane A, Swithenby E, et al. Design of higher education teaching models and carbon impacts. Int J of Sus in Higher Ed. 2015;16:96–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0065. Li C, Zhou H. Enhancing the efficiency of massive online learning by integrating intelligent analysis into MOOCs with an application to education of sustainability. Sustainability. 2018;10:468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020468. Sammalisto K, Sundström A, von Haartman R, et al. Learning about sustainability—what influences students’ self-perceived sustainability actions after undergraduate education? Sustainability. 2016;8:510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060510. Ahel O, Lingenau K. Opportunities and Challenges of Digitalization to Improve Access to Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education. In: Filho WL (ed) Universities as living labs for sustainable development: Supporting theimplementation of the sustainable development goals. Springer; 2020: 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15604-6 Wang A, Thompson M, Roy D, et al. Iterative user and expert feedback in the design of an educational virtual reality biology game. Interactive Learn Environ. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1678489. Dehghani M, Mohammadhasani N, Hoseinzade Ghalevandi M, et al. Applying AR-based infographics to enhance learning of the heart and cardiac cycle in biology class. Interactive Learn Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765394. Laru J, Järvelä S, Clariana RB. Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: a case study with K-12 learners. Interact Learn Environ. 2012;20:103–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003771350. Fiedler ST, Heyne T, Bogner FX. Explore your local biodiversity—how school grounds evoke visions of sustainability. Am Biol Teach. 2020;82:606–13. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.9.606. Thompson KV, Nelson KC, Marbach-Ad G, et al. Online interactive teaching modules enhance quantitative proficiency of introductory biology students. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010;9:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0028. Watson MK, Pelkey J, Noyes C, et al. Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student sustainability knowledge. Sustainability. 2019;11:4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174602. Sinakou D, Pauw B, et al. Designing powerful learning environments in education for sustainable development: a conceptual framework. Sustainability. 2019;11:5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215994. Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Rev. 2020;1–12. Nieto-Márquez NL, Baldominos A, Pérez-Nieto MA. Digital teaching materials and their relationship with the metacognitive skills of students in primary education. Education Sciences. 2020;10:113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040113. Sáiz-Manzanares MC, Marticorena-Sánchez R, Muñoz-Rujas N, et al. Teaching and learning styles on moodle: an analysis of the effectiveness of using STEM and Non-STEM Qualifications from a Gender Perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13:1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031166. Triviño-Cabrera L, Chaves-Guerrero EI, Alejo-Lozano L. The figure of the teacher-prosumer for the development of an innovative, sustainable, and committed education in times of COVID-19. Sustainability. 2021;13:1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031128. Yang K-T, Wang T-H, Chiu C. Study the effectiveness of technology-enhanced interactive teaching environment on student learning of junior high school biology. J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2015. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a. Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51:585–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13272. van der Keylen P, Lippert N, Kunisch R, et al. Asynchronous, digital teaching in times of COVID-19: a teaching example from general practice. GMS J Med Educ. 2020;37:98. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001391. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press; 1978. Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH. Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: a psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality Individ Differ. 2006;40:873–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015. Ploder A, Eder A. Semantic Differential. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. p. 563–71. Stoklasa J, Talášek T, Stoklasová J. Semantic differential for the twenty-first century: scale relevance and uncertainty entering the semantic space. Qual Quant. 2019;53:435–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0762-1. Rosenberg B, Navarro MA. Semantic differential scaling. In: Frey BB (ed) Educational reserach, measurement and evaluation. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018;140-44. Marinelli N, Fabbrizzi S, Alampi Sottini V, et al. Generation Y, wine and alcohol. A semantic differential approach to consumption analysis in Tuscany. Appetite. 2014;75:117–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.013. Dal Palù D, Buiatti E, Puglisi GE, et al. The use of semantic differential scales in listening tests: a comparison between context and laboratory test conditions for the rolling sounds of office chairs. Appl Acoust. 2017;127:270–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.016. Papendick M, Bohner G. “Passive victim - strong survivor”? Perceived meaning of labels applied to women who were raped. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0177550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177550. Klettner S. Affective communication of map symbols: a semantic differential analysis. Int J Geo-Inform. 2020;9:289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050289. Zhao Z, Ren J, Wen Y. Spatial perception of urban forests by citizens based on semantic differences and cognitive maps. Forests. 2020;11:64. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010064. Puyana-Romero V, Maffei L, Brambilla G, et al. Sound water masking to match a waterfront soundscape with the users’ expectations: the case study of the Seafront in Naples Italy. Sustainability. 2021;13:371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010371. Radulescu CV, Ladaru G-R, Burlacu S, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Romanian Labor Market. Sustainability. 2021;13:271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010271. Margono G. Multidimensional reliability of instrument for measuring students’ attitudes toward statistics by using semantic differential scale. Am J Educ Res. 2015;3:49–53. Stöckert A, Bogner FX. Cognitive learning about waste management: how relevance and interest influence long-term knowledge. Education Sciences. 2020;10:102. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040102. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18. Maclay H, Ware EE. Cross-cultural use of the semantic differential. Behav Sci. 1961;6:185–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830060303. Braun T, Dierkes P. Connecting students to nature – how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23:937–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866. Boeve-de Pauw J, van Hoof J, van Petegem P. Effective field trips in nature: the interplay between novelty and learning. J Biol Educ. 2019;53:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1418760. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572. Bond T, Yan Z, Heene M. Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge; 2020. Kaiser HF. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970;35:401–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817. Heise DR. The semantic differential and attitude research. Attitude Measurement. 1970;4:235–53. Gómez-Ruiz M-L, Morales-Yago F-J, de Lázaro-Torres M-L. Outdoor education, the enhancement and sustainability of cultural heritage: medieval Madrid. Sustainability. 2021;13:1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031106. Mullenbach LE, Andrejewski RG, Mowen AJ. Connecting children to nature through residential outdoor environmental education. Environ Educ Res. 2019;25:365–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1458215. Schönfelder ML, Bogner FX. Two ways of acquiring environmental knowledge: by encountering living animals at a beehive and by observing bees via digital tools. Int J Sci Educ. 2017;39:723–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1304670. Oon P-T, Fan X. Rasch analysis for psychometric improvement of science attitude rating scales. Int J Sci Educ. 2017;39:683–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299951. Huang F, Huang L, Oon P-T. Constructs Evaluation of Student Attitudes Toward Science—A Rasch Analysis. In: Khine MS, editor. Rasch Measurement: Applications in Quantitative Educational Research. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 139–57. Hailikari T, Katajavuori N, Lindblom-Ylanne S. The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:113. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113. Filho PS. Identifying students’ prior knowledge to enable Meaningful Learning. IJAERS. 2021;8:273–7. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.84.32. Llinares C, Page A. Analysis of gender differences in the perception of properties: an application for differential semantics. J Ind Eng Manag. 2009. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2009.v2n1.p273-298. Chráska M, Chrásková M. Semantic differential and its risks in the measurement of students’ attitudes. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;217:820–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.155. Camerini A-L, Schulz PJ. Social desirability bias in child-report social well-being: evaluation of the children’s social desirability short scale using item response theory and examination of its impact on self-report family and peer relationships. Child Indic Res. 2018;11:1159–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9472-9. Roth M, Altmann T. A multi-informant study of the influence of targets’ and perceivers’ social desirability on self-other agreement in ratings of the HEXACO personality dimensions. J Res Pers. 2019;78:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.11.008. Verardi S, Dahourou D, Ah-Kion J, et al. Psychometric properties of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale in eight African Countries and Switzerland. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2010;41:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109348918. Bradley JC, Waliczek TM, Zajicek JM. Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. J Environ Educ. 1999;30:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601873.