Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
COVID-19 và các chuyên gia sinh y học: Khi thẩm quyền nhận thức (có thể) không đủ
Tóm tắt
Bài luận phê phán này đánh giá khả năng tích hợp các loại chuyên môn khác nhau trong quá trình hoạch định chính sách, đặc biệt trong các tình huống khẩn cấp nghiêm trọng, như đại dịch COVID-19. Bài viết này dựa trên hai nghiên cứu trường hợp: (i) miễn dịch bầy đàn (Vương quốc Anh) và (ii) hạn chế tiếp cận máy thở cho người khuyết tật (Mỹ). Những nghiên cứu trường hợp này được thảo luận như những ví dụ về các khuyến nghị của các chuyên gia mà chưa được chấp nhận rộng rãi, mặc dù chúng được đưa ra trong khuôn khổ thẩm quyền nhận thức của các chuyên gia. Trong khi đóng góp cơ bản của các chuyên gia sinh y học trong việc xây dựng các chính sách y tế công cộng trong đại dịch COVID-19 được công nhận đầy đủ, bài viết này nhằm thảo luận về những vấn đề và hạn chế tiềm ẩn có thể phát sinh khi áp dụng một cách tiếp cận dựa trên chuyên gia một cách nghiêm ngặt. Bằng cách thu hút sự chú ý đến lợi ích của các nhóm thiểu số (những nhóm bị tước quyền và thiếu đại diện), bài viết cũng tuyên bố một khái niệm rộng hơn về "chuyên môn liên quan". Bài luận phê phán này do đó kêu gọi sự cần thiết của việc mở rộng sự bao gồm và đại diện hơn trong quá trình hoạch định chính sách y tế công cộng.
Từ khóa
#COVID-19 #chuyên gia sinh y học #thẩm quyền nhận thức #chính sách y tế công cộng #miễn dịch bầy đàn #người khuyết tật #chuyên môn liên quanTài liệu tham khảo
Andrews, E.E., K.B. Ayers, K.S. Brown, D.S. Dunn, and C.R. Pilarski. 2020. No body is expendable: Medical rationing and disability justice during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist 76(3): 451.
Aschwanden, C. 2021. Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible. Nature 591(7851): 520-522.
Baker, M., and S. Fink. 2020. At the top of the COVID-19 curve, How do hospitals decide who gets treatment? The New York Times, March 31. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/us/coronavirus-covid-triage-rationing-ventilators.html. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Bledsoe, T.A., J.A. Jokela, N.N. Deep, and L. Snyder Sulmasy. 2020. Universal do-not-resuscitate orders, social worth, and life-years: Opposing discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic and other health system catastrophes. Annals of Internal Medicine 173(3): 230-232.
Brett, T.S., and P. Rohani. 2020. Transmission dynamics reveal the impracticality of COVID-19 herd immunity strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(41): 25897-25903.
Chen, B., and D.M. McNamara. 2020. Disability discrimination, medical rationing and COVID-19. Asian Bioethics Review 12(4): 511-518.
Chowkwanyun, M., and A.L. Reed Jr. 2020. Racial health disparities and COVID-19—Caution and context. New England Journal of Medicine 383(3): 201-203
Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 2017. “People in this country have had enough of experts”: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies 11(1): 101-116.
Coady, D. 2006. When experts disagree. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3(1): 68-79.
Colfer, B. 2020. Herd immunity across intangible borders: Public policy responses to COVID-19 in Ireland and the UK. European Policy Analysis 6(2): 203-225.
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund. 2020. Preventing discrimination in the treatment of COVID-19 patients: The illegality of medical rationing on the basis of disability. March 25. https://dredf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/DREDF-Policy-Statement-on-COVID-19-and-Medical-Rationing-3-25-2020.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Farina, M., and A. Lavazza. 2020. Lessons from Italy’s and Sweden’s policies in fighting COVID-19: The contribution of biomedical and social competences. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 563397.
———. 2021a. Advocating for greater inclusion of marginalized and forgotten populations in COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. International Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604036
———. 2021b. The meaning of freedom after COVID-19. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00354-7.
Ferguson, N.M., D. Laydon, G. Nedjati-Gilani, et al. 2020. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, March 16. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Fricker, E. 2006. Second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(3): 592-618.
Goldman, A.I. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63(1): 85-110.
Haack, S. 2016. Scientism and its discontents. Proceedings of the Agnes Cuming Lectures in Philosophy, University College Dublin School of Philosophy, Dublin, Ireland, 22.
———. 2011. Defending science-within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Prometheus Books.
Hobbes, T. (1651/2008). Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Horton, R. 2020. Offline: COVID-19 and the NHS—“a national scandal”. The Lancet 395(10229): 1022.
———. 2020b. The COVID-19 catastrophe: What’s gone wrong and how to stop it happening again. John Wiley & Sons.
Jasanoff, S. 2012. Science and public reason. London, UK: Routledge.
Jasanoff, S., J.B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2019. Democratic governance of human germline genome editing. The CRISPR Journal 2(5): 266-271.
Khunti, K., A.K. Singh, M. Pareek, and W. Hanif. 2020. Is ethnicity linked to incidence or outcomes of COVID-19? British Medical Journal 369: m1548.
Kirby, T. 2020. Evidence mounts on the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 8(6): 547-548.
Lavazza A., and M. Farina. 2020. The role of experts in the COVID-19 pandemic and the limits of their epistemic authority in democracy. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 356.
———. 2021a. Experts, naturalism, and democracy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12321.
———. 2021b. The virtues needed by experts in action. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 58(4): 142-157.
McGuire, A.L., M.P. Aulisio, F.D. Davis, et al. 2020. Ethical challenges arising in the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) task force. The American Journal of Bioethics 20(7): 15-27.
Mouter, N., J.I. Hernandez, and A.V. Itten. 2020. Public participation in crisis policymaking. How 30,000 Dutch citizens advised their government on relaxing COVID-19 lockdown measures. medRxiv, November 12. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.09.20228718v1. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Novak, M. 2020. Alabama disavows plan to deny ventilators to COVID-19 patients with disabilities. Gizmodo, April 9. https://gizmodo.com/alabama-disavows-plan-to-deny-ventilators-to-covid-19-p-1842770059. Accessed December 16, 2021.
OCR (HHS Office for Civil Rights in Action). 2020. BULLETIN: Civil Rights, HIPAA, and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). HHS Office for Civil Rights in Action, March 28. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr-bulletin-3-28-20.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Piscitello, G.M., E.M. Kapania, W.D. Miller, J.C. Rojas, M. Siegler, and W.F. Parker. 2020. Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by US state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic review. JAMA Network Open 3(6): e2012606-e2012606.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Robertson, D. 2020. “The are leading us to catastrophe”: Sweden’s coronavirus stoicism begins to jar. The Guardian, March 31. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/30/catastrophe-sweden-coronavirus-stoicism-lockdown-europe. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Ross, D., J. Ladyman, and D. Spurrett. 2007. In defence of scientism. In Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized, edited by J. Ladyman, D. Ross, D. Spurrett, and J. Collier, 1-65. Oxford University Press.
Schicktanz, S., M. Schweda, and B. Wynne. 2012. The ethics of “public understanding of ethics”—Why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15(2): 129-139.
Sibony, A.L. 2020. The UK COVID-19 response: A behavioural irony? European Journal of Risk Regulation 11(2): 350-357.
Toulmin, S. 1972. Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Urbina-Blanco, C.A., S.Z. Jilani, I.R. Speight, et al. 2020. A diverse view of science to catalyse change. Nature Chemistry 12(9): 773-776.
Williams, M.S. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
White, D.B., and B. Lo. 2020. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 323(18): 1773-1774.
World Health Organization. 2020. Announcing the Pan-European Commission on Health and Sustainable Development: Rethinking policy priorities in the light of pandemics. World Health Organization, August 11. https://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/press-releases/2020/announcing-the-pan-european-commission-on-health-and-sustainable-development-rethinking-policy-priorities-in-the-light-of-pandemics. Accessed December 16, 2021.
Yancy, C.W. 2020. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA 323(19): 1891-1892.