COVID-19 Vaccine–Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis

Journal of Medical Internet Research - Tập 23 Số 6 - Trang e24435
Joanne Chen Lyu1, Eileen Le Han2, Garving K. Luli3
1Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
2School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
3Department of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States

Tóm tắt

Background Vaccination is a cornerstone of the prevention of communicable infectious diseases; however, vaccines have traditionally met with public fear and hesitancy, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exception. Social media use has been demonstrated to play a role in the low acceptance of vaccines. Objective The aim of this study is to identify the topics and sentiments in the public COVID-19 vaccine–related discussion on social media and discern the salient changes in topics and sentiments over time to better understand the public perceptions, concerns, and emotions that may influence the achievement of herd immunity goals. Methods Tweets were downloaded from a large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter data set from March 11, 2020, the day the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, to January 31, 2021. We used R software to clean the tweets and retain tweets that contained the keywords vaccination, vaccinations, vaccine, vaccines, immunization, vaccinate, and vaccinated. The final data set included in the analysis consisted of 1,499,421 unique tweets from 583,499 different users. We used R to perform latent Dirichlet allocation for topic modeling as well as sentiment and emotion analysis using the National Research Council of Canada Emotion Lexicon. Results Topic modeling of tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines yielded 16 topics, which were grouped into 5 overarching themes. Opinions about vaccination (227,840/1,499,421 tweets, 15.2%) was the most tweeted topic and remained a highly discussed topic during the majority of the period of our examination. Vaccine progress around the world became the most discussed topic around August 11, 2020, when Russia approved the world’s first COVID-19 vaccine. With the advancement of vaccine administration, the topic of instruction on getting vaccines gradually became more salient and became the most discussed topic after the first week of January 2021. Weekly mean sentiment scores showed that despite fluctuations, the sentiment was increasingly positive in general. Emotion analysis further showed that trust was the most predominant emotion, followed by anticipation, fear, sadness, etc. The trust emotion reached its peak on November 9, 2020, when Pfizer announced that its vaccine is 90% effective. Conclusions Public COVID-19 vaccine–related discussion on Twitter was largely driven by major events about COVID-19 vaccines and mirrored the active news topics in mainstream media. The discussion also demonstrated a global perspective. The increasingly positive sentiment around COVID-19 vaccines and the dominant emotion of trust shown in the social media discussion may imply higher acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines compared with previous vaccines.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/d41573-020-00151-8

GottliebSAmerica needs to win the coronavirus vaccine raceThe Wall Street Journal202004262021-04-09https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-needs-to-win-the-coronavirus-vaccine-race-11587924258

10.2471/blt.07.040089

10.1001/jama.2020.22018

10.1038/d41586-020-01423-4

10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.027

10.3201/eid2607.200282

TysonAJohnsonCFunkCU.S. public now divided over whether to get COVID-19 vaccinePew Research Center202009172021-04-15https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/17/u-s-public-now-divided-over-whether-to-get-covid-19-vaccine/

10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.044

10.2196/jmir.4969

10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.004

10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.025

10.1186/s12889-019-7103-8

10.1371/journal.pone.0019467

10.1080/17538068.2020.1858222

10.2196/26627

10.1177/1460458217740723

10.3390/vaccines9040315

10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846

10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495

10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1

BandaJTekumallaRWangGYuJLiuTDingYA large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter dataset for open scientific research - an international collaboration (Version 32) Data setZenodo202010182021-01-31http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4104587

The Panacea Lab: COVID-19 TwitterGitHub2021-02-02https://github.com/thepanacealab/covid19_twitter

tweetbotornotGitHub2021-06-22https://github.com/mkearney/tweetbotornot

Blum, A, 2020, Foundations of Data Science

Blei, D, 2003, J Mach Learn Res, 993

10.2196/25108

Plutchik, R, 1980, Theories of Emotion, 3, 10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7

Misuraca, M, ArXiv.

TurneyPMohammadSEmotions evoked by common words and phrases: using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexiconProceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text201006NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in TextJune 2010Los Angeles, CA2634

Naldi, M, ArXiv.

AkstJRussia approves world’s first coronavirus vaccineThe Scientist202008112021-06-22https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/russia-approves-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-67810

Pfizer and Biontech announce vaccine candidate against COVID-19 achieved success in first interim analysis from phase 3 studyPfizer202011092022-06-22https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-vaccine-candidate-against

10.1038/d41586-021-00268-9

First human trial of Oxford coronavirus vaccine shows promiseReuters202007202020-06-22https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-oxford-vaccine-idUSKCN24L1MP

10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495

10.3390/ijerph18020797

10.1371/journal.pone.0133505

WojcikSHughesASizing up Twitter usersPew Research Center201904242021-06-22https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Tập 23 Số 6

e24435

Thông tin tác giả