COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 27 Số 5 - Trang 1159-1170 - 2018
Caroline B. Terwee1, C. A. C. Prinsen1, Alessandro Chiarotto1, Marjan J. Westerman2, Donald L. Patrick3, Jordi Alonso4, L.M. Bouter5, Henrica C. W. de Vet1, Lidwine B. Mokkink1
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Health Sciences and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
4IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
5Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.

Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012–1027.

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.

Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1-eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977.

Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2-assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988.

Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational & psychological testing. Washington, DC.

U.S.Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Rockville, MD.

European Medicines Agency. (2005). Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health related quality of life (HRQL) Measures in the evaluation of medicinal products London.

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.

de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (2008). International handbook of survey methodology. New York: Psychology Press.

Prinsen, C. A., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, Jan 23 [Epub ahead of print].

Prinsen, C. A., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., Williamson, P. R., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set”—A practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449.

Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., Lenderking, W., Hays, R. D., Brod, M., Snyder, C., Boers, M., & Cella, D. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 739–746.

Olshansky, E., Lakes, K. D., Vaughan, J., Gravem, D., Rich, J. K., David, M., Nguyen, H., & Cooper, D. (2012). Enhancing the construct and content validity of rating scales for clinical research: Using qualitative methods to develop a rating scale to assess parental perceptions of their role in promoting infant exercise. The International Journal of Education Psychological Assessment, 10(1), 36–50.

Vogt, D. S., King, D. W., & King, L. A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 231–243.

de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiarotto, A., Ostelo, R. W., Boers, M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported instruments for physical functioning in low back pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 95, 73–93.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.

Lohr, K. N., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Burnam, M. A., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E. B., & Roberts, J. S. (1996). Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clinical Therapeutics, 18(5), 979–992.

Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205.

Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendivil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., & Alonso, J. (2008). Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health, 11(4), 700–708.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.

Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., Schwartz, C., Revicki, D. A., Moinpour, C. M., McLeod, L. D., Lyons, J. C., Lenderking, W. R., Hinds, P. S., Hays, R. D., Greenhalgh, J., Gershon, R., Feeny, D., Fayers, P. M., Cella, D., Brundage, M., Ahmed, S., Aaronson, N. K., & Butt, Z. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905.

Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schunemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926.

PROMIS® Instrument Development and Validation Scientific Standards Version 2.0 (2013). Retrieved 29 March 2017, from http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/measure-development-research/119-measure-development-research .

Kuper, A., Reeves, S., & Levinson, W. (2008). An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, a288.

COSMIN database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Retrieved 24 Feb 2015, from http://database.cosmin.nl/ .

Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.

Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research, Dec 19 [Epub ahead of print].

Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., DeBeer, H., Jaeschke, R., Rind, D., Meerpohl, J., Dahm, P., & Schunemann, H. J. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 383–394.

Schunemann, H. J., Brozek, J., Guyatt, G. H., & Oxman, A. D. (2013). GRADE Handbook. http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.9rdbelsnu4iy .

Leidy, N. K., & Vernon, M. (2008). Perspectives on patient-reported outcomes: Content validity and qualitative research in a changing clinical trial environment. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(5), 363–370.

Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Leidy, N. K., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D. (2009). Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health, 12(8), 1075–1083.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 22.

Zumbo, B. D., & Chan, E. K. H. (2014). Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and Health Sciences. New York: Springer International Publishing.