CMS: a novel surrogate model with hierarchical structure based on correlation mapping

Jin Y, Wang H, Chugh T et al (2019) Data-driven evolutionary optimization: an overview and case studies. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 23:442–458. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2869001

Chugh T, Sindhya K, Hakanen J, Miettinen K (2019) A survey on handling computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems with evolutionary algorithms. Soft Comput 23:3137–3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2965-0

Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2007) Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 463:3251–3269. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1900

Tang Y, Long T, Shi R et al (2020) Sequential radial basis function-based optimization method using virtual sample generation. J Mech Des Trans ASME 142:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046650

Li K, Wang S, Liu Y, Song X (2021) An integrated surrogate modeling method for fusing noisy and noise-free data. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053044

Bostanabad R, Chan YC, Wang L et al (2019) Globally approximate Gaussian processes for big data with application to data-driven metamaterials design. J Mech Des Trans ASME 141:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044257

Yang Z, Li X, Brinson LC et al (2018) Microstructural materials design via deep adversarial learning methodology. J Mech Des Trans ASME 140:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041371

Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2018) Adaptive surrogate modeling for time-dependent multidisciplinary reliability analysis. J Mech Des Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038333

Wang Z, Wang P (2015) An integrated performance measure approach for system reliability analysis. J Mech Des Trans ASME 137:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029222

Lai X, Wang S, Guo Z et al (2021) Designing a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on multiple models and dynamic data: a boom crane example. J Mech Des Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049861

Wang S, Lai X, He X et al (2022) Building a trustworthy product-level shape-performance integrated digital twin with multifidelity surrogate model. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052390

Peherstorfer B (2019) Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimation with adaptive low-fidelity models. SIAM-ASA J Uncertain Quantif 7:579–603. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1159208

Gorodetsky AA, Geraci G, Eldred MS, Jakeman JD (2020) A generalized approximate control variate framework for multifidelity uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109257

Gorodetsky AA, Jakeman JD, Geraci G, Eldred MS (2020) Mfnets: Multi-fidelity data-driven networks for bayesian learning and prediction. Int J Uncertain Quantif 10:595–622. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2020032978

Ng LWT, Eldred MS (2012) Multifidelity uncertainty quantification using non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation. Collect Tech Pap - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1852

Ng LWT, Willcox KE (2014) Multifidelity approaches for optimization under uncertainty. Int J Numer Methods Eng 746–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme

Peherstorfer B, Willcox K, Gunzburger M (2018) Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. SIAM Rev 60:550–591. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1082469

Peherstorfer B, Kramer B, Willcox K (2017) Combining multiple surrogate models to accelerate failure probability estimation with expensive high-fidelity models. J Comput Phys 341:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.04.012

Giselle Fernández-Godino M, Park C, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2019) Issues in deciding whether to use multifidelity surrogates. AIAA J 57:2039–2054. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057750

Cheng M, Jiang P, Hu J et al (2021) A multi-fidelity surrogate modeling method based on variance-weighted sum for the fusion of multiple non-hierarchical low-fidelity data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 64:3797–3818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03055-2

Zhou Q, Wang Y, Choi SK et al (2017) A sequential multi-fidelity metamodeling approach for data regression. Knowledge-Based Syst 134:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.07.033

Hao P, Feng S, Li Y et al (2020) Adaptive infill sampling criterion for multi-fidelity gradient-enhanced kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02493-8

Wang S, Liu Y, Zhou Q et al (2021) A multi-fidelity surrogate model based on moving least squares: fusing different fidelity data for engineering design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 64:3637–3652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03044-5

Haftka RT (1991) Combining global and local approximations. AIAA J 29:1523–1525. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10768

Eldred MS, Giunta AA, Collis SS (2004) Second-order corrections for surrogate-based optimization with model hierarchies. Collect Tech Pap - 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscip Anal Optim Conf 3:1754–1768. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-4457

Berci M, Toropov VV, Hewson RW, Gaskell PH (2014) Multidisciplinary multifidelity optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil with reference to a small UAV. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:683–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1066-2

Absi GN, Mahadevan S (2020) Simulation and sensor optimization for multifidelity dynamics model calibration. AIAA J 58:879–888. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058485

Batra R, Pilania G, Uberuaga BP, Ramprasad R (2019) Multifidelity information fusion with machine learning: a case study of dopant formation energies in hafnia. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:24906–24918. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b02174

Tao J, Sun G (2019) Application of deep learning based multi-fidelity surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization. Aerosp Sci Technol 92:722–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.002

Mainini L, Maggiore P (2012) A multifidelity approach to aerodynamic analysis in an integrated design environment. Collect Tech Pap - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1931

Zhang Y, Kim NH, Park C, Haftka RT (2018) Multifidelity surrogate based on single linear regression. AIAA J 56:4944–4952. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057299

Durantin C, Rouxel J, Désidéri JA, Glière A (2017) Multifidelity surrogate modeling based on radial basis functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:1061–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1703-7

Zhu QX, Chen ZS, Zhang XH et al (2020) Dealing with small sample size problems in process industry using virtual sample generation: a Kriging-based approach. Soft Comput 24:6889–6902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04326-3

Horn RA, Johnson CR (1985) Matrix Analysis

Yu S, Tranchevent L-C, De Moor B, Moreau Y (2011) Rayleigh Quotient-Type Problems in Machine Learning. Kernel-based Data Fusion for Machine Learning: Methods and Applications in Bioinformatics and Text Mining. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 27–37

Han ZH, Zimmermann R, Görtz S (2010) A new cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling of aerodynamic data. In: 48th AIAA Aerosp Sci Meet Incl New Horizons Forum Aerosp Expo 38108. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-1225

Song X, Lv L, Sun W, Zhang J (2019) A radial basis function-based multi-fidelity surrogate model: exploring correlation between high-fidelity and low-fidelity models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60:965–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02248-0

Toal DJJ (2015) Some considerations regarding the use of multi-fidelity Kriging in the construction of surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1223–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1209-5

Shi M, Lv L, Sun W, Song X (2020) A multi-fidelity surrogate model based on support vector regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61:2363–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02522-6

Benamara T, Breitkopf P, Lepot I et al (2017) Multi-fidelity POD surrogate-assisted optimization: concept and aero-design study. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:1387–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1730-4

Hu J, Zhang L, Lin Q et al (2021) A conservative multi-fidelity surrogate model-based robust optimization method for simulation-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 64:2525–2551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03007-w

Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2017) Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1550-y

Li K, Liu Y, Wang S, Song X (2021) Multifidelity data fusion based on gradient-enhanced surrogate modeling method. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051193

Zhou Y (2021) Linear constrained rayleigh quotient optimization: theory and algorithms. CSIAM Trans Appl Math 2:195–262. https://doi.org/10.4208/csiam-am.2021.nla.01

Seeger M (2004) Gaussian processes for machine learning.

Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2008) Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling

Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9:293–300

Tsamardinos I, Rakhshani A, Lagani V (2015) Performance-estimation properties of cross-validation-based protocols with simultaneous hyper-parameter optimization. Int J Artif Intell Tools 24:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213015400230

Viana FAC (2010) SURROGATES Toolbox User’s Guide

Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O (2003) On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 25:47–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5

Cai X, Qiu H, Gao L et al (2017) Adaptive radial-basis-function-based multifidelity metamodeling for expensive black-box problems. AIAA J 55:2424–2436. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055649

Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13:455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147

Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2018) Low-fidelity scale factor improves Bayesian multi-fidelity prediction by reducing bumpiness of discrepancy function. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:399–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2031-2

Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4

Bi Q, Wang G, Wang Y et al (2020) Digging trajectory optimization for cable shovel robotic excavation based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123118

Wang X, Sun W, Li E, Song X (2018) Energy-minimum optimization of the intelligent excavating process for large cable shovel through trajectory planning. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:2219–2237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2011-6

Zhao S, Lu TF, Koch B, Hurdsman A (2013) Dynamic modelling of 3D stockpile for life-cycle management through sparse range point clouds. Int J Miner Process 125:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2013.09.009