CEO Succession: Overcoming Forces of Inertia

Human Relations - Tập 50 - Trang 805-828 - 1997
Michael C. White, Mark Smith, Tim Barnett

Tóm tắt

Population ecologists suggest that inertialpressures make it difficult for organizations to adapttheir strategies and structures in response toenvironmental changes. One way in which organizations may attempt to overcome these inertial tendenciesis by selecting executive successors with differentcareer specializations than their predecessors, whichmay enable them to better cope with changingenvironmental contingencies. The present study examined therelationship between the previous CEO s careerspecialization, the corporate strategy in place at thetime of the succession event, and the careerspecialization of the new CEO from 1981-1990. The resultssuggest that organizations often chose successors withdifferent career specializations than theirpredecessors, and that previous corporate strategy wasa relatively poor predictor of successors specializations.These results differ from earlier research findingsconcerning executive succession between 1957-1981.Possible reasons for these differences are discussed, and the implications for future research are considered.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ALLEN, M. P., & PANIAN, S. K. Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 538-547. ALLEN, M. P., PANIAN, S. K., & LOTZ, R. E. Managerial succe ssion and organizational performance: A recalcitrant problem revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 167-180. BETTIS, R. A. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 1981, 21, 379-393. BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. E., & HOLLAND, P. W. Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1975. BOEKER, W., & GOODSTEIN, J. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 805-826. CANNELLA, A., LUBATKIN, M., & DAPOUCH, M. Antecedents of executive selection: Additional empirical evidence. Proceedings of the Academ y of Management, Miami, Florida, 1991, pp, 11-15. CARROLL, G. R. Organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1984, 10, 71-93. CHAGANTI, R., & SAMBHARYA, R. Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8, 393-401. CHANDLER, A. D. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1962. CHILD, J. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 1972, 6, 1-22. CYERT, R. M., & MARCH, J. G. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963. DALTON, D. R., & KESNER, I. F. Inside/outside succe ssion and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive succession. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 736-742. DALTON, D. R., & KESNER, I. F. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/ outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 749-762. DAVIDSON, W. N. III, WORRELL, D. L., & CHENG, L. Key Executive Succession and Stockholder Wealth: The influence of successor's origin, position, and age. Journal of Management, 1990, 16, 647-664. EVERITT, B. S. The analysis of contingency tables. London: Halsted Press, 1977. FINKELSTEIN, S., & HAMBRICK, D. C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 484-503. FREDRICKSON, J. W., HAMBRICK, D. C., & BAUMRIN, S. A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13(2), 255-270. FRIEDMAN, S. D. Succession systems in large corporations: Characteristics and correlates of performance. Human Resource Management, 1986, 25, 191-213. FRIEDMAN, S. D. Why hire from within? Cause s and consequences of internal promotion systems. Proceedings of the Academy of Management National Meeting, Miami, Florida, 1991, pp. 272-276. FRIEDMAN, S. D., & SINGH, H. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 718-744. GAMSON, W. A., & SCOTCH, N. A. Scapegoating in baseball. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 69-72. GOODSTEIN, J., & BOEKER, W. Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 306-330. GOULDNER, A. W. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press, 1954. GRIMM, C. M., & SMITH, K. G. The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers: An Empirical Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 1986. GRIMM, C. M., & SMITH, K. G. Research notes and communications management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 557-562. GUEST, R. Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1962, 68, 47-64. GUPTA, A. K. Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: a conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 399-412. GUPTA, A. K. Contingency perspective s on strategic leadership: Current knowledge and future re search direction. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988, pp. 147-178. GUPTA, A. K., & GOVINDARAJAN V. Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectivene ss at strategy implementation. Academ y of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 25-41. GUTHRIE, J. P., & DATTA, D. K. Executive selection decisions: Contextual determinants of CEO characteristics, 1992. Paper presented at the National Academy Meeting, Las Vegas, 1992. GUTHRIE, J. P., & OLIAN, J. D. Does context affect staffing decisions? The case of general managers. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44, 263-292. HAGER, B., DRISCOLL L., WEBER, J., & McWILLIAMS, G. CEO wanted: No insiders, please. Business Week, August 12, 1991, pp. 44-45. HAMBRICK, D. C. Operationalizing the concept of business-leve l strategy in research. Academy of Managem en t Review, 1980, 5, 567-575. HAMBRICK, D. C., & MASON, P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a re flection of its top managers. Academ y of Management Review, 1984, 9, 193-206. HANNAN, M. T., & FREEMAN, J. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 929-964. HANNAN, M. T., & FREEMAN, J. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 149-164. HAVEMEN, H. A. Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Academ y of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 864-881. HAYES, R. H., & ABERNATHY, W. J. Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 1980, 58(4), 67-77. HELMICH, D. L. Organizational growth and succession patterns. Academ y of Managem ent Journal, 1974, 17, 771-775. HELMICH, D. L., & BROWN, W. B. Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 371-381. HITT, M. A., IRELAND, R. D., & PALIA, K. A. Industrial firms' grand strategy and functional importance: Mode rating effects of technology and uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 265-298. KANTER, R. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977. KELLY, D., & AMBURGEY, T. L. Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 591-612. LAWRENCE, P. R., & DYER, D. Renewing American industry. New York: Free Press, 1983. LIEBERSON, S., & O'CONNOR, J. F. Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 117-130. LUBATKIN, M. H., CHUNG, K. H., ROGERS, R. C., & OWERS, J. E. Stockholder reactions to CEO changes in large corporations. Academ y of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 47-68. MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A. Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958. MICHEL, J. G., & HAMBRICK, D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academ y of Management Journal, 1992, 35(1), 9-37. MILLER, D. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 1991, 37(1), 34-52. MILLS, J. The new competitors: A report on American managers. New York: Wiley, 1985. MONTGOMERY, C. A. The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 299-307. NADLER, D. A., & TUSHMAN, M. L. Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Executive, 1989, 3(3), 194-204. OSBORN, R. N., JAUCH, L. R., MARTIN, T. N., & GLUECK, W. F. The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 183-191. PASCARELLA, P. The new achievers. New York: Free Press, 1984. PERROW, C. Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1986. PFEFFER, J. The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 104-112. PFEFFER, J. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981. PFEFFER, J. Organizational demography. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), 1983, Research in organ izational behavior (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 299-357. PFEFFER, J., & DAVIS-BLAKE, A. Administrative succe ssion and organizational performance: How administrator experience me diates the succession effect. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 72-83. PFEFFER, J., & LEBLEBICI, H. Executive recruitment and the deve lopment of interfirm organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1973, 18, 449-461. PFEFFER, J., & MOORE, W. L. Average Tenure of Department He ads: The e ffects of paradigm, size, and departmental demography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 387-406. PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R. Organizational context and the characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 74-88. PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978. PITTS, R. A., & HOPKINS, H. D. Firm diversity: Conceptualization and me asurement. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7, 620-629. REED, R., & REED, M. CEO experience and diversification strategy fit. Journal of Management Studies, 1989, 26, 251-270. REINGANUM, M. R. The e ffect of executive succe ssion on stockholder wealth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30, 46-60. RUMELT, R. P. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1974. SALANCIK, G. R., & PFEFFER, J. Who gets power and how they hold onto it: A strategic contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 1977, 5, 3-21. SALANCIK, G., & PFEFFER, J. Effects of ownership and performance on executive succession in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 653-664. SCHWARTZ, K. B., & MENON, K. Executive succession in failing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 680-686. SMITH, M., & WHITE, M. C. Strategy, CEO specialization and succe ssion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 263-280. SNOW, C. C., & HREBINIAK, L. G. Strategy, distinctive, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 317-336. SONG, J. H. Diversification strategies and the experience of top executives of large firms. Research Notes and Communications, 1982, 377-380. SZILAGYI, A. D. Jr., & SCHWEIGER, D. M. Matching Managers to strategies: A review and suggested framework. Academy of Managem ent Review, 1984, 9, 626-637. THOMAS, A. S., LITSCHERT, R. J., & RAMASWAMY, K. The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 509-522. THOMPSON, J. D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967. TROW, D. B. Executive succession in small companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1961, 6, 228-239. TUSHMAN, M., & ROMANELLI, E. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Stawand L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985, pp. 171-222. TUSHMAN, M. L., VIRANY, B., & ROMANELLI, E. Executive succe ssion, strategy reorientation, and organizational evolution. Technology in Society, 1985, 7, 297-314. TUSHMAN, M. L., NEWMAN, W. H., & ROMANELLI, E. Converge nce and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Review, 1986, 29(1), 29-44. VANCIL, R. F. Passing the baton: Managing the process of CEO succession. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1987. VENKATRAMAN, N., & GRANT, J. H. Construct measureme nt in organizational strategy rese arch: A critique and proposal. Academ y of Management Review, 1986, 11, 71-87. VIRANY, B., & TUSHMAN, M. L. Top management teams and corporate success in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 1986, 1(3), 261-274. WHITE, M. C., SMITH, M., & BARNETT, T. A typology of executive career specialization. Human Relations, 1994, 31, 11-22. WIERSEMA, M. F., & BANTEL, K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(1), 91-121. WORRELL, D. L., DAVIDSON, W., III, WALLACE, N., & GLASCOCK, J. L. Stockholder reactions to departures and appointments of key executive s attributable to firings. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 387-401. ZAJAC, E. J. CEO se lection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theore tical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11, 217-230.