Burdens and Balancing in Multisided Markets: The First Principles Approach of Ohio v. American Express

Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 668–691.

Brief of 28 Professors. (2017). Brief of 28 Professors of Antitrust Law as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners in Ohio et al. v. American Express Company.

Brief of Antitrust Law & Economics Scholars. (2018). Brief for Amici Curiae Antitrust Law & Economics Scholars in Support of Respondents in in Ohio et al. v. American Express Company.

Carlton, D. W., & Winter, R. A. (2018). Vertical MFN’s and credit-card no-surcharge restraints. SSRN at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2982115 .

Conner, J. M., Gaynor, M., McFadden, D., Noll, R., Perloff, J. M., Stiglitz, J. A., White, L. J., & Winter, R. A. (2017). Brief for amici curiae in support of petitioners in Ohio et al. v. American Express Company.

Cooper, J. C. (2013). Privacy and antitrust: Underpants gnomes, the first amendment, and subjectivity. George Mason Law Review, 20, 1129–1146.

Emch, E., & Thompson, T. S. (2006). Market definition and market power in payment card networks. Review of Network Economics, 5, 45–60.

Evans, D. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20, 325–381.

Evans, D. (2011). Two-sided markets. In D. Evans (ed.), Platform economics: Essays on multi-sided businesses (pp. 135–160). Boston: Competition Policy International.

Evans, D., & Schmalensee, R. (2018). Brief for Amici Curiae Prof. David S. Evans and Prof. Richard Schmalensee in Support of Respondents in Ohio et al. v. American Express Company.

Federal Trade Commission. (1997). Staples and Office Depot, Complaint for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, April 10, 1997.

Federal Trade Commission. (1997). Staples and Office Depot, Plaintiff memorandum on points and authorities in support of motions for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, April 10, 1997.

Filistrucchi, L., Geradin, D., van Damme, E., & Affeldt, P. (2014). Market definition in two-sided markets: Theory and practice. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 10, 293–339.

Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174.

Hatzopoulos, V. (2018). The collaborative economy and EU law. Portland: Hart Publishing.

Heyer, K. (2012). Welfare standards and merger analysis: Why not the best? Competition Policy International, 8, 146–172.

Hoppner, T. (2015). Defining markets for multi-sided platforms: The case of search engines. World Competition, 38, 349–366.

Kaplow, L., & Shapiro, C. (2007). Antitrust. In A. M. Polinsky & S. Shavell (Eds.), Handbook of law and economics (Vol. 2, pp. 1073–1225). Oxford: Elsevier.

Katz, M., & Sallet, J. (2018). Multisided platforms and antitrust enforcement. Yale Law Journal, 127, 2142–2175.

Klein, B. (1996). Market power in aftermarkets. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17, 143–164.

Klein, B., Lerner, A. V., Murphy, K. M., & Plache, L. L. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets: The antitrust economics of payment card interchange fees. Antitrust Law Journal, 73, 571–626.

Kruger, M. (2009). The elasticity pricing rule for two-sided markets: A note. Review of Network Economics, 8, 271–278.

Manne, G. A., & Wright, J. D. (2010). Google and the limits of antitrust: The case against the case against Google. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 34, 171–244.

McChesney, F. (1996). The role of economists in modern antitrust: An overview and summary. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17, 119–126.

OECD. (2013). The role of measurement of quality in competition analysis. OECD Policy Roundtable.

Ratliff, J. D., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2014). Is there a market for organic search engine results and can their manipulation give rise to antitrust liability? Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 10, 517–541.

Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of European Economic Association, 1, 990–1029.

Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 645–667.

Rooney, W. H., & Park, D. K. (2007). The two-sided market literature enriches traditional antitrust analysis. Competition Policy International, 3, 211–219.

Rosch, J. T. (2010). Dissenting statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch In the Matter of Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, FTC. Docket No. 9345 and File No. 101-0152.

Rybnicek, J., & Wright, J. D. (2014). Outside in or inside out? Counting merger efficiencies inside and out of the relevant market. In E. William (Ed.), Kovacic: An antitrust tribute (Vol. II, pp. 443–462). New York: Institute of Competition Law.

Rysman, M. (2004). Competition between networks: A study of the market for Yellow Pages. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 483–512.

Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 125–143.

Sidak, J. G., & Willig, R. D. (2018). Brief for Amici Curiae J. Gregory Sidak and Robert D. Willig in Support of Respondents in Ohio et al. v. American Express Company.

United States Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. Washington, D.C.: DOJ and FTC.

Ward, P. R. (2017). Testing for multisided platform effects in antitrust market definition. The University of Chicago Law Review, 84, 2012–2059.

Weyl, E. G. (2010). A price theory of multi-sided platforms. American Economic Review, 100, 1642–1672.

White, L. J. (2008). Market power and market definition in monopolization cases: A paradigm is missing. In W. D. Collins (Ed.), Issues in competition law and policy. Chicago: American Bar Association.

Wismer, S., & Rasek, A. (2017). Market definition in multi-sided markets. OECD Competition Committee Note, 1–15.

Wright, J. D. (2012). Abandoning antitrust’s Chicago obsession: The case for evidence-based antitrust. Antitrust Law Journal, 78, 241–271.