Building the Eco-social State: Do Welfare Regimes Matter?

Journal of Social Policy - Tập 43 Số 4 - Trang 679-703 - 2014
Max Koch1, Martin Fritz2
1*Lund University,Faculty of Social Sciences,Socialhögskolan,Box 23,22100,Lund,Sweden
2*GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences,Data Archive for the Social Sciences,European Data Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (EUROLAB),Unter Sachsenhausen 6–8,50667 Cologne,Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractAuthors such as Dryzek, Gough and Meadowcroft have indicated that social-democratic welfare states could be in a better position to deal with development of the ‘green’ or ‘eco’ state, and the intersection of social and environmental policies, than conservative or liberal welfare regimes (synergy hypothesis). However, this hypothesis has as yet not been examined in comparative empirical research. Based on comparative empirical data from EUROSTAT, the World Bank, the OECD, the Global Footprint Network and the International Social Survey Programme, we are carrying out two research operations: First, by applying correspondence analysis, we contrast the macro-structural welfare and sustainability indicators of thirty countries and ask whether clusters largely follow the synergy hypothesis. Second, we raise the issue of whether differences in the institutional and organisational capabilities of combining welfare with environmental policies are reflected in people's attitudes and opinions. With regard to the first issue, our results suggest that there is no ‘automatic’ development of the ecostate based on already existing advanced welfare institutions. Representatives of all welfare regimes are spread across established, deadlocked, failing, emerging and endangered ecostates. As for the second issue, the results are mixed. While responses to the statements ‘economic growth always harms the environment’ and ‘governments should pass laws to make ordinary people protect the environment, even if it interferes with people's rights to make their own decisions’ did not vary according to welfare regimes, people from social-democratic countries expressed more often than average their willingness to accept cuts in their standard of living in order to protect the environment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1332/030557311X603592

10.1093/0199249024.001.0001

Bourdieu, 1984, Distinction: A Social Critque of the Judgement of Taste

10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005

Blasius, 2006, Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods

Blasius, 2009, Capitalism, Democracy and the Prevention of War and Poverty

The World Bank (2014), ‘World development indicators’, available online at http://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed on 13 January 2014).

10.4232/1.11792

Dryzek, 2008, The ecological crisis of the welfare state, Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 325

OECD (2014), OECD.StatExtracts and indicators on green growth, http://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed between 13 and 15 January 2014).

Jacobs M. (2012), ‘Green growth: economic theory and political discourse’, Working Paper No. 108, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London.

10.1177/0952872002012002114

Esping-Andersen, 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

10.1201/9781420011234

Christoff, 2011, Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society

Meadowcroft, 2008, From welfare state to environmental state?, Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 331

10.4232/1.11418

10.2307/j.ctt1t89gc5

10.4232/1.11791

Goodman, 1996, Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies

Global Footprint Network (2014), ‘Country trend figures’, www.footprintnetwork.org (accessed between 16 and 17 January 2014).

EUROSTAT (2013), Online statistical databases at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (accessed between 8 and 12 of April 2013).

Jones, 1993, New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe

10.1177/095892879600600102

Koch, 2014, Climate change, carbon trading and societal self-defence, Real-World Economics Review, 67

Daly, 2009, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications

10.1177/0261018310396036

Görg, 2003, Regulation der Naturverhältnisse: Zu einer kritischen Theorie der ökologischen Krise

10.1080/17450140903484049

10.1017/S0047279412001018

Gough, 2011, Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society

2003, Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Social Policy in the Tiger Economics

Jackson, 2009, Prosperity Without Growth? Economics for a Future Planet, 10.4324/9781849774338

10.1057/9780230355088

10.3167/IJSQ.2013.030102

10.1080/13501760902983283

Pye, 2008, Addressing the Social Dimensions of Environmental Policy

10.1017/S0007123499000010

10.1057/9781137314796

10.4337/9781848442993

Walker, 2012, Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics, 10.4324/9780203610671

2012, Living Planet Report 2012

10.4232/1.11793

Meadowcroft, 2005, The State and the Global Ecologicl Crisis

Wilkinson, 2010, The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone

10.1177/0958928708094890

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Social Policy

Tập 43 Số 4

679-703

Thông tin tác giả