Building of Academics’ Networks—An analysis based on Causation and Effectuation theory
Tóm tắt
Individual academic scientists engage in various collaborations through their involvement in both regional and extra-regional networks. However, little is known about how these networks are actually formed. Focusing on university and industry networks, we take the view that the process of building new networks is an entrepreneurial activity that involves unpredictability and often goal ambiguity. This paper thus employs the theories of causation and effectuation to explore how the personal networks of academics are initiated. With evidence from the networks of 12 academics based at the University of Stavanger, Norway we show that both causation and effectuation are employed by academics when building their networks. The usage of causation was found to be more consistent with building industry networks whereas effectuation was employed when building networks in academia. Consequently, effectuation was characteristic of the international networks which were found to be mostly constituted by other academics. On the regional level, a mixture of both approaches of causation and effectuation was observed, with more industry linkages suggesting a tendency to be more causal than effectual. Furthermore, while causation was employed for project level networking, effectuation was employed for establishing more individual level ties.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agrawal AK (2001) University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. Int J Management Reviews 3:285–302
Ahoba-Sam R (2019) Why do academics engage locally? Insights from the University of Stavanger. Reg Stud Reg Sci 6:250–264
Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manage Sci 45:905. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
Alpaydin UAR, Atta Owusu K, Moghadam-Saman S (2018) The role of universities in innovation and regional development: the case of Rogaland Region. RUNIN Working Paper Series; Vol. 2018, No. 05
Altmann A, Ebersberger B (2013) Universities in change: a brief introduction. In: Managing higher education institutions in the age of globalization. Springer, New York, pp 1–8
Andersson S (2011) International entrepreneurship, born globals and the theory of effectuation. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 18:627–643
Andersson S, Evers N (2015) International opportunity recognition in international new ventures—a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective. J Int Entrep 13:260–276
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE, London
Charles D (2006) Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 19:117–130
Christopherson S, Clark J (2010) Limits to ‘the learning region’: what university-centered economic development can (and cannot) do to create knowledge-based regional economies. Local Econ 25:120–130
Clark BR (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Pergamon Press, New York
Engel Y, Kaandorp M, Elfring T (2017) Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. J Bus Ventur 32:35–51
Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Res Policy 32:109–121
Fernández-Pérez V, Alonso-Galicia PE, Rodríquez-Ariza L, Fuentes-Fuentes MDM (2015) Professional and personal social networks: a bridge to entrepreneurship for academics? Eur Manag J 33:37–47
Foss L, Gibson D (2015) The entrepreneurial university: context and institutional change
Galkina T, Chetty S (2015) Effectuation and networking of internationalizing SMes. Manag Int Rev 55:647–676
Goddard JB, Chatterton P (1999) Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: harnessing the potential of universities. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 17:685–699
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380
Gulbrandsen M, Slipersæter S (2007) The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. In: Universities and strategic knowledge creation, vol 4. Edward Elgar, Great Britain
Gunasekara C (2006) Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. J Technol Transfer 31:101–113
Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, De Lacey S (2016) Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Hum Reprod 31:498–501
Hannibal M, Evers N, Servais P (2016) Opportunity recognition and international new venture creation in university spin-offs—Cases from Denmark and Ireland. J Int Entrep 14:345–372
Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35:519–530
Henry N, Pinch S (2000) Spatialising knowledge: placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley. Geoforum 31:191–208
Jain S, George G, Maltarich M (2009) Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Res Policy 38:922–935 (Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business)
Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D (2000) Comparing academic entrepreneurship in europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus Econ 14:299–309
Lam A (2007) Knowledge networks and careers: academic scientists in industry-university links. J Management Studies 44:993–1016
Lowrie A, McKnight PJ (2004) Academic research networks: a key to enhancing scholarly standing. Eur Manag J 22:345–360
Mahroum S (2000) Scientists and global spaces. Technol Soc 22:513–523
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87
Meyer M (2003) Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R D Manage 33:107–115
Miller K, Alexander A, Cunningham J, Albats E (2018) Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Manag 77:9
Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37
Nyeko K, Sing N (2015) Academic Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Academics: Are They the Same. Int J Soc Sci Humanity 5(12):1050–1055
Pataraia N, Margaryan A, Falconer I, Littlejohn A (2014) Discovering academics’ key learning connections: An ego-centric network approach to analysing learning about teaching. J Workplace Learn 26:56–72
Pataraia N, Margaryan A, Falconer I, Littlejohn A (2015) How and what do academics learn through their personal networks. J Furth High Educ 39:336–357
Perkmann M, Walsh K (2007) University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. Int J Management Reviews 9:259–280
Perkmann M, King Z, Pavelin S (2011) Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Res Policy 40:539–552
Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, Geuna A, Grimaldi R, Hughes A, Krabel S, Kitson M, Llerena P, Lissoni F, Salter A, Sobrero M (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res Policy 42:423–442
Plewa C, Korff N, Johnson C, MacPherson G, Baaken T, Rampersad GC (2013) The evolution of university–industry linkages—A framework. J Eng Technol Manag 30:21–44
Prashantham S, Kumar K, Bhagavatula S, Sarasvathy SD (2019) Effectuation, network-building and internationalisation speed. Int Small Bus J 37:3–21
Ramos-Vielba I, Sánchez-Barrioluengo M, Woolley R (2016) Scientific research groups’ cooperation with firms and government agencies: motivations and barriers. J Technol Transf 41:558–585
Sarasvathy S (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev 26:243–263
Sarasvathy S (2005) What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial? University of Virginia—Darden School of Business, Virginia
Sarasvathy SD, Dew N (2011) Without judgment: an empirically-based entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Rev Austrian Econ 26:277–296
Sataøen HL (2018) Transforming the “third mission” in Norwegian higher education institutions: a boundary object theory approach. Scand J Educ Res 62:52–67
Schreier C, Senn A (2018) Western expatraits building networks in Asia—an analysis based on causation vs. effectuation theory. ABAC J 38:116–132
Shaw JK, Allison J (1999) The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: analysing the role of higher education. Reg Stud 33:896–902
Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M (2007) Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 23:640–660
Sternberg R (2000) Innovation networks and regional development—evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS): theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. Eur Plan Stud 8:389–407
Stuck J, Broekel T, Revilla Diez J (2016) Network structures in regional innovation systems. Eur Plan Stud 24:423–442
Trippl M (2013) Scientific mobility and knowledge transfer at the interregional and Intraregional level. Reg Stud 47:1653–1667
Trippl M, Sinozic T, Smith HL (2012) The “third mission” of universities and the region: Comparing the UK,Sweden and Austria. Paper at the 52nd European Congress of the RSAI, 21st August 2012 Bratislava, Slovakia. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00063.pdf. Accessed 01.09.2019
Venkataraman S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In: Katz JA (ed) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, vol 3. JAI Press, Greenwich
Vorley T, Nelles J (2009) Building entrepreneurial architectures: a conceptual interpretation of the third mission. Policy Futur Educ 7:284–296
Wilson JR (2014) Essentials of business research, a guide to doing you research project. SAGE, London
Yin RK (1984) Case study research: design and methods. SAGE, London
Yin RK (2002) Case study research—design and methods. SAGE, London