Bringing the Real World to Psychometric Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Literacy Assessments with Black, Latina, and Arab Women in Real-World Settings

Journal of Cancer Education - Tập 28 - Trang 738-743 - 2013
Karen Patricia Williams1, Thomas N. Templin2
1College of Human Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
2College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA

Tóm tắt

This research describes the development and evaluation of a new scale for assessing functional cervical cancer health literacy, the Cervical Cancer Literacy Assessment Tool (C-CLAT). In phase 1, 35 items in English, Spanish, and Arabic for C-CLAT were generated, taking into account three content domains—Awareness, Knowledge, and Prevention/Control. After content validation, 24 items were retained for psychometric evaluation. In phase 2, the 24-item C-CLAT was evaluated in three racial/ethnic populations of urban women (N = 543). Psychometric methods included item analysis, multifactor item response theory modeling, and concurrent correlations. The final C-CLAT consisted of 16 items, with an internal consistency reliability of 0.72. C-CLAT reliabilities in Black, Latina, and Arab women were 0.73, 0.76, and 0.60, respectively. The rank order correlations of item difficulties across racial/ethnic groups was high (r's = 0.97 to 0.98). The C-CLAT was positively related to educational level, and Arab women scored significantly higher than the Black and Latina participants. This study presents a psychometrically sound instrument that measures health literacy related to cervical cancer. The C-CLAT is a tool that can be orally administered by a lay person and used in a community-based health promotion intervention.

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Cancer Society (2011) Global cancer facts and figures, 2nd edn. American Cancer Society, Atlanta Aguirre AC, Ebrahim N, Shea JA (2005) Performance of the English and Spanish S-TOFHLA among publicly insured Medicaid and Medicare patients. Patient Educ Couns 56:332–339 Cohen L, Manion L (1980) Rsearch methods in education. Croom Helm, Dover Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD (1998) Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ Behav 25:613 Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW et al (1993) Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med 25 Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Gazmararian JA, Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Scott TL, Green DC et al (1999) Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA 281:545–551 Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C (2012) National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 102:1274–1281 National Cancer Institute (2006) Americans unclear on when to get cancer screening tests. NCI Cancer Bull 3:4–5 Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, Committee on Health Literacy, Board of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academy Press, Washington Paasche-Orlow MK, Wolf MS (2010) Promoting health literacy research to reduce health disparities. J Health Commun 15:34–41 Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR (1995) The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med 10:537–541 Pleasant A, Mckinney J, Rikard RV (2011) Health literacy measurement: a proposed research agenda. J Health Commun 16:11–21 Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academy Press, Washington, DC Rivera-Vasquez O, Mabiso A, Hammad A, Williams KP (2009) A community-based approach to translating and testing cancer literacy assessment tools. J Cancer Educ 24 Wasserman JD, Bracken BA (2003) Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In: Handbook of Psychology. Wiley, New York Williams KP (2007) Kin keeper: a family-focused cancer prevention model for African-American women. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 15:291–305 Williams KP, Mullan PB, Fletcher FE (2007) Working with African American women to develop a cancer literacy assessment tool. J Cancer Educ 22:241–244 Williams KP, Templin TN, Hines RD (2013) Answering the call: a tool that measures functional breast cancer literacy. J Health Commun. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.778367