Hiệu suất sinh sản được giải thích bởi tính thuộc địa và thời gian sinh trưởng nhưng không phải do đô thị hóa ở một loài chim ăn thịt tổng quát

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 26 - Trang 743-753 - 2023
Claudina Solaro1,2, José Hernán Sarasola2,3
1Colaboratorio de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Conservación (ColBEC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Santa Rosa, Argentina
2Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa (INCITAP), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Santa Rosa, Argentina
3Centro para el Estudio y Conservación de las Aves Rapaces en Argentina (CECARA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Avda, Santa Rosa, Argentina

Tóm tắt

Sự mở rộng đô thị được công nhận là làm cho sinh quyển trở nên đồng nhất, với nhiều loài không thể thích nghi với các tình huống mới do con người tạo ra. Tuy nhiên, một số loài có thể sống và sinh sản thành công trong các môi trường đô thị hóa. Chúng tôi đã so sánh hiệu suất sinh sản của loài chim ăn thịt tương đối phổ biến và chưa được nghiên cứu nhiều, chimango caracara (Milvago chimango) ở một gradient đô thị tại miền trung Argentina. Dữ liệu sinh sản từ 359 tổ đã được thu thập trong các mùa sinh sản từ năm 2010 đến năm 2012. Chim thường làm tổ thành các thuộc địa từ 3 đến 75 cặp. Tỷ lệ thành công tổng thể là 49,9% với năng suất trung bình là 1 ± 1,14 chim con mỗi tổ. Các mô hình cho thấy rằng thành công sinh sản và năng suất cao hơn ở những tổ có thời gian đẻ trứng sớm hơn và nằm trong những thuộc địa lớn hơn và gradient đô thị hóa không ảnh hưởng đến sản lượng sinh sản cũng như ngày đẻ trứng. Các môi trường đô thị tại miền trung Argentina dường như cung cấp tỷ lệ thành công sinh sản tương tự cho chimango caracara như các môi trường nông thôn hay tự nhiên. Do đó, chimango caracara cho thấy tính linh hoạt hành vi để tồn tại thành công trước những thay đổi do con người, điều này được phản ánh qua việc chúng sinh sản thành công trong một loạt các môi trường như tự nhiên, nông thôn và các khu vực đô thị hóa bị ảnh hưởng bởi con người.

Từ khóa

#đô thị hóa #chim ăn thịt #sinh sản #gradient đô thị #động vật hoang dã

Tài liệu tham khảo

Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18:1482–1491 Bellocq M, Filloy J, Garaffa P (2008) Influence of agricultural intensity and urbanization on the abundance of the raptor chimango caracara (Milvago chimango) in the Pampean region of Argentina. Ann Zool Fennici 45:128–134 Biondi L, Bó M, Favero M (2005) Dieta del chimango (Milvago chimango) durante el periodo reproductivo en el sudeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ornitol Neotrop 16:31–42 Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519 Boal C (2019) Urban raptor communities: why some raptors and not others occupy urban environments. In: Boal C (ed) Urban Raptors. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Boal CW, Mannan RW (1999) Comparative breeding ecology of Cooper’s hawks in urban and exurban areas of southeastern Arizona. J Wildl Manage 63:77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802488 Boggie MA, Mannan RW (2014) Examining seasonal patterns of space use to gauge how an accipiter responds to urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan 124:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.001 Bond G, Burnside NG, Metcalfe DJ et al (2005) The effects of land-use and landscape structure on barn owl (Tyto alba) breeding success in southern England, U.K. Landsc Ecol 20:555–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-5037-7 Bonnington C, Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2015) Ecological traps and behavioural adjustments of urban songbirds to fine-scale spatial variation in predator activity. Anim Conserv 18:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12206 Botelho E, Arrowood P (1996) Nesting success of western burrowing owls in natural and human-altered environments. In: Bird CD, Verlan DE, Negro JJ (eds) Raptors in Human Landscapes: Adaptations to Built and Cultivated Environments. Academic Press Limited, New York, pp 61–68 Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed) Cardador L, Carrete M, Mañosa S (2012) Inter-individual variability and conspecific densities: Consequences for population regulation and range expansion. PLoS ONE 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033375 Cardilini A, Weston M, Nimmo D et al (2013) Surviving in sprawling suburbs: suburban environments represent high quality breeding habitat for a widespread shorebird. Landsc Urban Plan 115:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.001 Carrete M, Sánchez-Zapata J, Tella J et al (2006) Components of breeding performance in two competing species: habitat heterogeneity, individual quality and density-dependence. Oikos 112:680–690 Carrete M, Tella J, Blanco G, Bertellotti M (2009) Effects of habitat degradation on the abundance, richness and diversity of raptors across Neotropical biomes. Biol Conserv 142:2002–2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.012 Chamberlain D, Cannon A, Toms M, et al (2009) Avian productivity in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. Ibis (Lond 1859) 151:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00899.x Charter M, Izhaki I, Bouskila A, Leshem Y (2007) Breeding success of the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) nesting on buildings in Israel. J Raptor Res 41:139–143 Delignette-Muller M-L, Dutang C (2015) fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. J Stat Softw 64:1–34 Dunn PO, Møller AP (2014) Changes in breeding phenology and population size of birds. J Anim Ecol 83:729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12162 Dykstra CR, Hays JL, Simon MM (2009) Spatial and temporal variation in reproductive rates of the Red-shouldered Hawk in suburban and rural Ohio. Condor 111:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2009.080002 Fraga R, Salvador S (1986) Biología reproductiva del Chimango (Polyborus chimango). El Hornero 12:223–229 Gahbauer MA, Bird DM, Clark KE et al (2015) Productivity, mortality, and management of urban peregrine falcons in northeastern North America. J Wildl Manage 79:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.803 Gehlbach F (1996) Eastern Screech Owls in suburbia: a model of raptor urbanization. In: Raptors in Human Landscapes Adaptations to built and cultivated environments. pp 69–74 Hogg JR, Nilon CH (2015) Habitat associations of birds of prey in urban business parks. Urban Ecosyst 18:267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0394-8 Kettel EF, Gentle LK, Quinn JL, Yarnell RW (2017) The breeding performance of raptors in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. J Ornithol 159:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-017-1497-9 Kreiderits A, Gamauf A, Krenn HW, Sumasgutner P (2016) Investigating the influence of local weather conditions and alternative prey composition on the breeding performance of urban Eurasian Kestrels Falco tinnunculus. Bird Study 3657:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1213791 Kübler S, Kupko S, Zeller U (2005) The kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) in Berlin: investigation of breeding biology and feeding ecology. J Ornithol 146:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0089-2 Leveau LM, Gorleri FC, Roesler I, González‐Táboas F (2022) What makes an urban raptor? Ibis (Lond 1859) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13062 Lin WL, Lin SM, Lin JW et al (2015) Breeding performance of Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus in urban and rural environments of Taiwan. Bird Study 62:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1005570 Marzluff JM (2017) A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future. Ibis (Lond 1859) 159:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12430 McKinney M (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 Millsap B, Breen T, McConnell E et al (2004) Comparative fecundity and survival of Bald Eagles fledged from suburban and rural natal areas in Florida. J Wildl Manage 68:1018–1031. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[1018:CFASOB]2.0.CO;2 Møller A (2009) Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 159:849–858 Morrison J, Phillips L (2000) Nesting habitat and success of the Chimango Caracara in southern Chile. Wilson Bull 112:225–232 Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. T & AD Poyser, London Parker JW (1996) Urban ecology of the Mississippi Kite. In: Bird CD, Verlan DE, Negro JJ (eds) Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press Limited, New York, Adaptation to built and cultivate environments, pp 45–52 Pedrana J, Isacch J, Bó M (2008) Habitat relationships of diurnal raptors at local and landscape scales in southern temperate grasslands of Argentina. Emu 108:301–310 Rebolo-Ifrán N, Tella JL, Carrete M (2017) Urban conservation hotspots: Predation release allows the grassland-specialist burrowing owl to perform better in the city. Sci Rep 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03853-z Reynolds SJ, Ibañez-Álamo JD, Sumasgutner P, Mainwaring MC (2019) Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. J Ornithol 160:841–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8 Rose S, Sumasgutner P, Koeslag A, Amar A (2017) Does seasonal decline in breeding performance differ for an African raptor across an urbanization gradient? Front Ecol Evol 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00047 Rosenfield RN, Bielefeldt J, Affeldt JL, Beckmann DJ (1995) Nesting density, nest area reoccupancy, and monitoring implications for Cooper’s hawks in Wisconsin. J Raptor Res 29:1–4 Sasvari L, Hegyi Z (1994) Colonial and solitary nesting choice as alternative breeding tactics in Tree Sparrow Passer-Montanus. J Anim Ecol 63:265–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/5545 Schlaepfer M, Runge M, Sherman P (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02580-6 Sellers KF, Shmueli G (2010) A flexible regression model for count data. Ann Appl Stat 4:943–961. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS306 Serrano D, Forero M, Donázar J, Tella J (2004) Dispersal and social attraction affect colony selection and dynamics of Lesser Kestrels. Ecology 85:3438–3447 Sol D, Lapiedra O, González-Lagos C (2013) Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Anim Behav 85:1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.023 Solaro C (2018) Costs and benefits of urban living in raptors. In: Sarasola J, Grande J, Negro J (eds) Birds of Prey Biology and conservation in the XXI century. Springer International Publishing AG part, Cham, Switzerland, pp 177–196 Solaro C, Sarasola JH (2019) Urban living predicts behavioural response in a neotropical raptor. Behav Processes 169:103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103995 Solaro C, Sarasola JH (2015) Nest-spacing, not human presence, influences the breeding of Chimango Caracaras (Milvago chimango) in a peri-urban reserve. Emu 115:72–75. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU14038 Steenhof K, Newton I (2007) Assessing nesting success and productivity. In: Bird DM, Bildstein KL (eds) Raptor Research and Management Techniques. Hancock House Publisher, pp 181–192 Stout W, Anderson RK, Papp JM (1998) Urban, suburban and rural Red-tailed Hawk nesting habitat and populations in southeast Wisconsin. J Raptor Res 32:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958970600794008 Stout W, Temple S, Papp J (2006) Landscape correlates of reproductive success for an urban-suburban Red-tailed Hawk population. J Wildl Manage 70:989–997 Sumasgutner P (2013) Diet specialisation and breeding success along an urban gradient: the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in Vienna, Austria. Beiträge Zur Jagd Und Wildforsch 38:385–397 Sumasgutner P, Millán J, Curtis O et al (2016) Is multiple nest building an adequate strategy to cope with inter-species nest usurpation? BMC Evol Biol 16:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0671-7 Sumasgutner P, Schulze CH, Krenn HW, Gamauf A (2014a) Conservation related conflicts in nest-site selection of the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and the distribution of its avian prey. Landsc Urban Plan 127:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.03.009 Sumasgutner P, Nemeth E, Tebb G et al (2014b) Hard times in the city – attractive nest sites but insufficient food supply lead to low reproduction rates in a bird of prey. Front Zool 11:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-11-48 Tella J, Hiraldo F, Donázar-Sancho J, Negro J (1996) Costs and benefits of urban nesting in the lesser kestrel. In: Bird CD, Verlan DE, Negro JJ (eds) Raptors in Human Landscapes: Adaptations to Built and Cultivated Environments. Academic Press Limited, New York, pp 53–60 Travaini A, Rodríguez A, Ceballos O et al (1995) Roadside raptor surveys in Central Argentina. Hornero 014:64–66 Verhulst S, Nilsson J-A (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2146 Welch-Acosta BC, Skipper BR, Boal CW (2019) Comparative breeding ecology of Mississippi Kites in urban and exurban areas of West Texas. J F Ornithol 90:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12303 White C, Olsen P, Kiff L (1994) Order Falconiformes – Family Falconidae (Falcons and Caracaras). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol 2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Lynx, Barcelona, pp 216–277