Breast cancer in young women and prognosis: How important are proliferation markers?

European Journal of Cancer - Tập 84 - Trang 278-289 - 2017
Hanna Fredholm1,2, Kristina Magnusson3, Linda S. Lindström4, Nicholas P. Tobin5, Henrik Lindman6, Jonas Bergh5,7, Lars Holmberg8,9, Fredrik Pontén3, Jan Frisell1,2, Irma Fredriksson1,2
1Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Breast- and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
3Uppsala University, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden
4Karolinska Institutet, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Stockholm, Sweden
5Karolinska Institutet, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden
6Uppsala University, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
7Karolinska Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
8Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Regional Cancer Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
9King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, London, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Azim, 2012, Elucidating prognosis and biology of breast cancer arising in young women using gene expression profiling, Clin Cancer Res, 18, 1341, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2599 Fredholm, 2009, Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment, PLoS One, 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0007695 Fredholm, 2016, Long-term outcome in young women with breast cancer: a population-based study, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 160, 131, 10.1007/s10549-016-3983-9 Gnerlich, 2009, Elevated breast cancer mortality in women younger than age 40 years compared with older women is attributed to poorer survival in early-stage disease, J Am Coll Surg, 208, 341, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.001 Partridge, 2016, Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival, J Clin Oncol, 34, 3308, 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8013 Kroman, 2000, Factors influencing the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: population based study, BMJ, 320, 474, 10.1136/bmj.320.7233.474 Anders, 2008, Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression, J Clin Oncol, 26, 3324, 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2471 Bharat, 2009, Patient and tumor characteristics associated with increased mortality in young women (< or =40 years) with breast cancer, J Surg Oncol, 100, 248, 10.1002/jso.21268 Colleoni, 2002, Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation, Ann Oncol, 13, 273, 10.1093/annonc/mdf039 Sabiani, 2016, Breast cancer in young women: pathologic features and molecular phenotype, Breast, 29, 109, 10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.007 Swain, 2015, Quantitative gene expression by recurrence score in ER-positive breast cancer, by age, Adv Ther, 32, 1222, 10.1007/s12325-015-0268-3 Ahn, 2007, Poor outcome of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer at very young age is due to tamoxifen resistance: nationwide survival data in Korea–a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society, J Clin Oncol, 25, 2360, 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3754 Cancello, 2010, Prognosis and adjuvant treatment effects in selected breast cancer subtypes of very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 21, 1974, 10.1093/annonc/mdq072 Tang, 2015, Luminal B subtype: a key factor for the worse prognosis of young breast cancer patients in China, BMC Cancer, 15, 201, 10.1186/s12885-015-1207-z Morrison, 2012, Tumour biomarker expression relative to age and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer, Br J Cancer, 107, 382, 10.1038/bjc.2012.219 Cheang, 2009, Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 736, 10.1093/jnci/djp082 Klintman, 2013, The prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI), phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), cyclin B1, cyclin A, and Ki67, alone and in combinations, in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0081902 Sorlie, 2001, Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98, 10869, 10.1073/pnas.191367098 Tobin, 2014, Multi-level gene expression signatures, but not binary, outperform Ki67 for the long term prognostication of breast cancer patients, Mol Oncol, 8, 741, 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.02.007 Coates, 2015, Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015, Ann Oncol, 26, 1533, 10.1093/annonc/mdv221 Goldhirsch, 2013, Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013, Ann Oncol, 24, 2206, 10.1093/annonc/mdt303 Guo, 2015, Positive expression of cyclin D1 is an indicator for the evaluation of the prognosis of breast cancer, Int J Clin Exp Med, 8, 18656 Agarwal, 2009, Integrative analysis of cyclin protein levels identifies cyclin b1 as a classifier and predictor of outcomes in breast cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 15, 3654, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3293 Rudolph, 2003, Differential prognostic impact of the cyclins E and B in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer, Int J Cancer, 105, 674, 10.1002/ijc.11132 Strand, 2012, Combination of the proliferation marker cyclin A, histological grade, and estrogen receptor status in a new variable with high prognostic impact in breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 131, 33, 10.1007/s10549-011-1386-5 Voduc, 2008, The combination of high cyclin E and Skp2 expression in breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and the basal phenotype, Hum Pathol, 39, 1431, 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.03.004 McShane, 2005, REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK), Eur J Cancer, 41, 1690, 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.032 von Elm, 2007, The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies, Lancet, 370, 1453, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X Uhlen, 2015, Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome, Science, 347, 10.1126/science.1260419 Hammond, 2010, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 2784, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 Prat, 2013, Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 31, 203, 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4134 Li, 2015, Clinicopathologic characteristics of oestrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative/Her2-negative breast cancer according to a novel definition of negative progesterone receptor status: a large population-based study from China, PLoS One, 10 Maisonneuve, 2014, Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes, Breast Cancer Res, 16, R65, 10.1186/bcr3679 Dowsett, 2011, Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the international Ki67 in breast cancer working group, J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, 1656, 10.1093/jnci/djr393 Honma, 2015, Ki-67 evaluation at the hottest spot predicts clinical outcome of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy, Breast Cancer, 22, 71, 10.1007/s12282-013-0455-5 Gudlaugsson, 2012, Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer, Histopathology, 61, 1134, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04329.x Knutsvik, 2014, Evaluation of Ki67 expression across distinct categories of breast cancer specimens: a population-based study of matched surgical specimens, core needle biopsies and tissue microarrays, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112121 Wolff, 2013, Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update, J Clin Oncol, 31, 3997, 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 Ahlin, 2007, Ki67 and cyclin A as prognostic factors in early breast cancer. What are the optimal cut-off values?, Histopathology, 51, 491, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02798.x Michalides, 2002, Cyclin A is a prognostic indicator in early stage breast cancer with and without tamoxifen treatment, Br J Cancer, 86, 402, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600072 Mu, 2015, A standardized method for quantifying proliferation by Ki-67 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry in breast cancer, Ann Diagn Pathol, 19, 243, 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.05.002 Sun, 2017, Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of cyclin B expression in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis, Med Baltim, 96, e6860, 10.1097/MD.0000000000006860 Li, 2016, Evaluation of CCND1 amplification and CyclinD1 expression: diffuse and strong staining of CyclinD1 could have same predictive roles as CCND1 amplification in ER positive breast cancers, Am J Transl Res, 8, 142 Gao, 2013, Prognostic value of cyclin E expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis, Tumour Biol, 34, 3423, 10.1007/s13277-013-0915-8 Sapino, 2006, Routine assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer using a multicore tissue microarray procedure, Virchows Arch, 449, 288, 10.1007/s00428-006-0233-2 Batistatou, 2013, Evaluation of current prognostic and predictive markers in breast cancer: a validation study of tissue microarrays, Anticancer Res, 33, 2139 Kim, 2001, Cyclin E overexpression as an independent risk factor of visceral relapse in breast cancer, Eur J Surg Oncol, 27, 464, 10.1053/ejso.2001.1137 Lindahl, 2004, Overexpression of cyclin E protein is associated with specific mutation types in the p53 gene and poor survival in human breast cancer, Carcinogenesis, 25, 375, 10.1093/carcin/bgh019 Nielsen, 1996, Cyclin E overexpression, a negative prognostic factor in breast cancer with strong correlation to oestrogen receptor status, Br J Cancer, 74, 874, 10.1038/bjc.1996.451 Hunt, 2005, Cyclin E as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer, Semin Cancer Biol, 15, 319, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.007 Lundgren, 2015, Cyclin E1 is a strong prognostic marker for death from lymph node negative breast cancer. A population-based case-control study, Acta Oncol, 54, 538, 10.3109/0284186X.2014.965274 Keyomarsi, 2002, Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer, N Engl J Med, 347, 1566, 10.1056/NEJMoa021153 Fasching, 2011, Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, BMC Cancer, 11, 486, 10.1186/1471-2407-11-486 Smith, 2000, Sensitivity of cyclin E-overexpressing cells to cisplatin/taxol combinations, Anticancer Res, 20, 2537 Hwang, 2003, Prognostic value of combined analysis of cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients, Pathol Int, 53, 74, 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2003.01441.x