Boyle, Spinoza and Glauber: on the philosophical redintegration of saltpeter—a reply to Antonio Clericuzio
Tóm tắt
The so-called ‘redintegration experiment’ is traditionally at the center of the comments on the supposed Boyle/Spinoza controversy. A. Clericuzio influentially argued (criticizing R.A. & M.B. Hall’s interpretation) in his publications that, in De nitro, Boyle accounted for the ‘redintegration’ of saltpeter on the grounds of the chemical properties of corpuscles and “did not make any attempt to deduce them from mechanical principles”. By way of contrast, this paper argues that with his De nitro Boyle wanted to illustrate and promote his new corpuscular or mechanical philosophy, and that he made significant attempts to explain the phenomena in terms of mechanical qualities. Boyle had borrowed the ‘redintegration experiment’ from R. Glauber and used it in an attempt to demonstrate that his philosophy was superior to the Peripatetic and Paracelsian theory. Consequently, Clericuzio’s characterization of the Boyle/Spinoza controversy as a discussion between a strict mechanical philosopher and a chemist is problematic and a wider view of Spinoza’s interpretation and its context gives a fairer picture.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anstey, P.: Robert Boyle and the heuristic value of mechanism. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 33, 161–174 (2002)
Anstey, P.: Revisiting matter, form and mechanism in the seventeenth century. Brit. J. Hist. Philos. 23(3), 569–579 (2015)
Boyle, R.: A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. CUP, Cambridge (1996)
Boyle, R.: The Works of Robert Boyle. Pickering & Chatto, London (1999–2000)
Boyle, R.: A physico-chemical essay, containing an experiment with some considerations touching the different parts and redintegration of salt-petre. In: Hunter, M., Davis, E.B. (eds.) The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 2, pp. 85–113. Pickering and Chatto, London (2000a)
Boyle, R.: The origin of forms and qualities. In: Hunter, M., Davis, E.B. (eds.) The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 5, pp. 1–550. Pickering and Chatto, London (2000b)
Boyle, R.: Of the imperfecion of the chymist’s doctrine of qualities. In: Hunter, M., Davis, E.B. (eds.) The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 8, pp. 391–392. Pickering and Chatto, London (2000c)
Buyse, F.: Spinoza and Robert Boyle’s definition of mechanical philosophy. Hist. Philos. 8, 73–89 (2010)
Buyse, F.: Spinoza, Boyle, Galileo: was spinoza a strict mechanical philosopher? Intellect. Hist. Rev. 23(1), 76–89 (2013a)
Buyse, F.: Boyle, Spinoza and the Hartlib Circle: the correspondence which never took place. Soc. Polit. 7(2), 34–53 (2013b)
Chalmers, A.: Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: a reply to Anstey and Pyle. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 33, 191–197 (2002)
Chalmers, A.: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)
Clericuzio, A.: A redefinition of Boyle’s chemistry and corpuscular philosophy. Ann. Sci. 47, 561–589 (1990)
Clericuzio, A.: Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)
Daudin, H.: Spinoza et la science expérimentale: sa discussion de l’expérience de Boyle. In: Revue de histoire des sciences, pp. 179–90 (1949)
Della Rocca, M.: Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. OUP, New York (1996)
Gabbey, A.: Spinoza’s natural science and methodology. In: Garrett, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, pp. 142–191. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Gabbey, A.: What was “mechanical” about “the mechanical philosophy”? In: Palmerino, C.R., Thijssen, J.M.M.H. (eds.) The Reception of Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth Century Europe, pp. 11–23. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Glauber, J.R.: Works (Translated by C. Packe). Thomas Milbourn, London (1689)
Hall, R.A., Hall, M.B.: Philosophy and natural philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza. In: Braudel, F. (ed.) Mélanges Alexandre Koyré II: L’aventure de l’esprit, pp. 241–256. Hermann, Paris (1964)
Hunter, M.: Boyle: Between God and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven (2009)
Hunter, M.: Self-definition through self-defence; interpreting the apologies of Robert Boyle. In: Hunter, M. (ed.) Robert Boyle, 1627–91: Scrupulosity and Science, pp. 135–156. The Boydell Press, Woodbridge (2000)
Johnston, J.: Naeukeurige beschryving van de natuur der viervoetige dieren, vissen en bloedloze water-dieren, vogelen, kronkel-dieren, slangen en draken (Dutch translation by M. Grausius of the Historiae naturalis). I. I. Schipper, Amsterdam (1660)
Macherey, P.: Spinoza lecteur et critique de Boyle. Rev. Nord. 77, 733–774 (1995)
Nadler, S.: Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018)
Newman, W.: The alchemical sources of Robert Boyle’s corpuscular philosophy. Ann. Sci. 53, 567–585 (1996)
Newman, W.: How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 41, 203–213 (2010)
Newman, W., Principe, L.M.: Alchemy tried in the fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the fate of helmontian chymistry. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005)
Pyle, A.: Boyle on science and the mechanical philosophy: a reply to Chalmers. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 33, 175–190 (2002)
Spinoza, B.: The Collected Works of Spinoza, vols. I, II. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1985, 2016)
Young, J.T.: Faith, Medical Alchemy and Natural Philosophy. Ashgate, Aldershot (1998)
Webster, Ch.: The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. Duckworth, London (1975)