Books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey

Journal of Knowledge Management - 2012
AlexanderSerenko1, NickBontis2, MadoraMoshonsky3
1Associate Professor of Management Information Systems in the Faculty of Business Administration, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada
2Associate Professor of Strategy at the DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
3Graduate Student in the Faculty of Business Administration, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada

Tóm tắt

PurposeAs a response to the claims that much of management academic research is irrelevant from the practitioner perspective, this study aims to empirically investigate whether books serve as effective knowledge distribution agents and whether peer‐reviewed publications are used in the development of book content.Design/methodology/approachA citation analysis of 40 authored and nine edited books was done, followed by a survey of 35 book authors.FindingsThis study refutes the previous claims that management academic research has made little impact on the state of practice. Peer‐reviewed sources, such as refereed journals, book chapters, and conference proceedings, are used to develop the content of knowledge management and intellectual capital (KM/IC) books. Even though most business professionals do not directly read academic articles, the knowledge existing in these articles is delivered to them by means of books and textbooks.Practical implicationsScholarly research has played a significant role in developing the KM/IC field. This study confirms the existence of the indirect knowledge dissemination channels where books serve as knowledge transmission agents. Therefore, academics should not change their research behavior. Instead, infrastructure should be developed to facilitate the transition of scholarly knowledge to practitioners. The question is not whether academic research is relevant, instead it is whether it reaches practitioners in the most efficient way.Originality/valueThis is the most comprehensive empirical investigation of the role of books in academic knowledge transition ever conducted.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, N. and Harzing, A.‐W. (2009), “When knowledge wins: transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 72‐95.

Andriessen, D. (2004), “Reconciling the rigor‐relevance dilemma in intellectual capital research”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 11 Nos 4/5, pp. 393‐401.

Andrikopoulos, A. (2010), “Accounting for intellectual capital: on the elusive path from theory to practice”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 180‐7.

Ankers, P. and Brennan, R. (2002), “Managerial relevance in academic research: an exploratory study”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 15‐21.

Baldridge, D.C., Floyd, S.W. and Markóczy, L. (2005), “Are managers from Mars and academicians from Venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25 No. 11, pp. 1063‐74.

Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (1999), “Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 3‐16.

Bennis, W.G. and O'Toole, J. (2005), “How business schools lost their way”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 5, pp. 96‐104.

Björk, B.‐C., Roos, A. and Lauri, M. (2009), “Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability”, Information Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, available at: http://informationr.net/ir/14‐1/paper391.html.

Bontis, N. and Serenko, A. (2009), “A follow‐up ranking of academic journals”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 16‐26.

Bontis, N., Serenko, A. and Biktimirov, E.N. (2006), “MBA knowledge management course: is there an impact after graduation?”, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 2 Nos 3/4, pp. 216‐37.

Booker, L., Bontis, N. and Serenko, A. (2008), “The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital research”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 235‐46.

Dalton, M.S. (2006), “A system destabilized: scholarly books today”, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 251‐69.

Daly, W.J. and Brater, D.C. (2000), “Medieval contributions to the search for truth in clinical medicine”, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 530‐40.

Darton, R. (1982), “What is the history of books?”, Daedalus, Vol. 111 No. 3, pp. 65‐83.

Detlor, B., Julien, H., Willson, R., Serenko, A. and Lavallee, M. (2011), “Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 572‐85.

Duncan, W.J. (1974), “Transferring management theory to practice”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 724‐38.

Eijkman, H. (2011), “The learning organization as concept and journal in the neo‐millennial era: a plea for critical engagement”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 164‐74.

Ferguson, J. (2005), “Bridging the gap between research and practice”, Knowledge Management for Development Journal, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 46‐54.

Ghoshal, S. (2005), “Bad management theories are destroying good management practices”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 75‐91.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, London.

Grant, R.M. (2002), “The knowledge‐based view of the firm”, in Choo, C.W. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 133‐48.

Greco, A.N., Wharton, R.M., Estelami, H. and Jones, R.F. (2006), “The state of scholarly journal publishing: 1981‐2000”, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 155‐214.

Hodgkinson, G.P. and Starkey, K. (2011), “Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: reframing relevance”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 355‐69.

Jackson, J. (2010), “Google: 129 million different books have been published”, PC World, available at: www.pcworld.com/article/202803/google_129_million_different_books_have_been_published.html.

Jagodinski, C.M. (2008), “The university press in North America: a brief history”, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 1‐20.

Jennex, M.E. and Olfman, L. (2005), “Assessing knowledge management success”, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 33‐49.

Jennex, M.E. and Olfman, L. (2006), “A model of knowledge management success”, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 51‐68.

Jennex, M.E., Smolnik, S. and Croasdell, D.T. (2009), “Towards a consensus knowledge management success definition”, VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 174‐88.

Knights, D. (2008), “Myopic rhetorics: reflecting epistemologically and ethically on the demand for relevance in organizational and management research”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 537‐52.

Knights, D. and Scarbrough, H. (2010), “In search of relevance: perspectives on the contribution of academic‐practitioner networks”, Organization Studies, Vol. 31 Nos 9/10, pp. 1287‐309.

McLuhan, M. (1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Ma, Z. and Yu, K.‐H. (2010), “Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998‐2007”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 175‐89.

Merton, R.K. and Sztompka, P. (1996), On Social Structure and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Nicolai, A. and Seidl, D. (2010), “That's relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science”, Organization Studies, Vol. 31 Nos 9/10, pp. 1257‐85.

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Patriotta, G. and Starkey, K. (2008), “From utilitarian morality to moral imagination: reimagining the business school”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 319‐27.

Pearson, J.M., Pearson, A. and Shim, J.P. (2005), “The relevancy of information systems research: the practitioner's view”, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 50‐67.

Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C.T. (2002), “The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 78‐95.

Roberts, C.H. and Skeat, T.C. (1983), The Birth of the Codex, Oxford University Press, London.

Rodríguez‐Ruiz, Ó. and Fernández‐Menéndez, J. (2009), “Intellectual capital revisited: a citation analysis of ten years of research in the area (1997‐2007)”, Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 203‐19.

Ruth, S., Shaw, N.C. and Frizzell, V. (2003), “Knowledge management education: an overview of programs of instruction”, in Holsapple, C.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 581‐603.

Saenger, P. (1975), “Colard Mansion and the evolution of the printed book”, The Library Quarterly, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 405‐18.

Serenko, A. and Bontis, N. (2004), “Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 185‐98.

Serenko, A. and Bontis, N. (2009), “Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 4‐15.

Serenko, A. and Dohan, M. (2011), “Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: example from the field of artificial intelligence”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 629‐48.

Serenko, A. and Jiao, C. (2012), “Investigating information systems research in Canada”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (forthcoming).

Serenko, A., Bontis, N. and Hardie, T. (2007), “Organizational size and knowledge flow: a proposed theoretical link”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 610‐27.

Serenko, A., Bontis, N. and Hull, E. (2011a), “Practical relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital scholarly research: books as knowledge translation agents”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1‐9.

Serenko, A., Cox, R.A.K., Bontis, N. and Booker, L.D. (2011b), “The superstar phenomenon in the knowledge management and intellectual capital academic discipline”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 333‐45.

Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K. and Hardie, T. (2010), “A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994‐2008)”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 3‐23.

Shrivastava, P. (1987), “Rigor and practical usefulness of research in strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 77‐92.

Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001), “Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 3‐26.

Starkey, K. and Tempest, S. (2005), “The future of the business school: knowledge challenges and opportunities”, Human Relations, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 61‐82.

Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A. and Tempest, S. (2009), “Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 547‐58.

Tenopir, C. (2004), “Online databases – online scholarly journals: how many?”, Library Journal, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA374956.html.

Wensley, R. (2007), “Beyond rigour and relevance: the underlying nature of both business schools and management research”, AIM working paper series, Advanced Institute of Management Research, Coventry.

White, J.J. (1983), “Scholarly books: what, to whom and why”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 723‐9.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Knowledge Management

Thông tin tác giả