Book review

Carrie Menkel‐Meadow

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Auerbach, J. 1983.Justice without law? New York: Oxford University Press.

Bellah, R.H. and others. 1985.Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bush, R.A. 1984. Dispute resolution alternatives and the goals of civil justice: Jurisdictional principles for process choices.Wisconsin Law Review 1984: 893–1034.

Cobb, S. and J. Rifkin. 1991. Practice and paradox: Deconstructing neutrality in mediation.Law & Social Inquiry 16: 35–62.

Christie, N. 1977. Conflicts as property.British Journal of Criminology 17: 1–15.

Freund, J. 1994.The neutral negotiator: Why and how mediation can work to resolve dollar disputes. New York: Prentice Hall Law & Business.

Friedman, G. 1993.A guide to divorce mediation. New York: Workman.

Friere, P. 1970.The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.

Gilligan, C. 1982.In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Greatbatch, D. and R. Dingwall. 1989. Selective facilitation: Some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators.Law and Society Review 23: 613–641.

Grillo, T. 1991. The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women.Yale Law Journal 100: 1545–1610.

Haynes, J. 1992. Mediation and therapy: An alternative view.Mediation Quarterly 10(1): 21–33.

Habbermas, J. 1987.The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.

——————. 1985.The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.

Kohn, A. 1990.The brighter side of human nature: Altruism & empathy in everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

Menkel-Meadow, C. Forthcoming. Whose dispute is it, anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases).Georgetown Law Journal.

——————. 1992. Is altruism possible in lawyering?Georgia State University Law Review 8: 385–419.

——————. 1991. Pursuing settlement in an adversary culture: A tale of innovation co-opted or “The Law of ADR.”Florida State Law Review 19: 1–46.

------. 1985. The transformation of disputes by lawyers: What the dispute paradigm does and does not tell us.Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution 1985: 1–34.

——————. 1984. Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem-solving.UCLA Law Review 31: 754–842.

Raiffa, H. 1991. Post-settlement settlements. InNegotiation theory and practice, edited by J.W. Breslin and J.Z. Rubin. Cambridge, Mass.: PON Books (Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School).

Schon, Donald A. 1983.The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Silbey, S. and S. Merry. 1986. Mediator settlement strategies.Law & Policy Quarterly 8: 7–32.

Smith, W. 1994. Power, ripeness and intervention in international conflict.Negotiation Journal 10: 147–160.

Stulberg, J. 1981. The theory and practice of mediation: A reply to Professor Susskind.Vermont Law Review 6: 85–117.

Susskind, L. 1981. Environmental mediation and the accountability problem.Vermont Law Review 6: 1–47.

Tannen, D. 1990.You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: William Morrow.

Tyler, T. and A. Lind. 1988.The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

Weber, M. 1988.On Charisma and Institution Building, edited by S.N. Eisenstadt. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.