Bone loss management: A potpourri of options

Rodriguez, 2003, Does the total condylar 3 constrained knee prosthesis predispose to failure of revision total knee replacement?, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, 153, 10.2106/00004623-200300004-00021 Engh, 1999, Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction, Instr Course Lect, 48, 167 Sheth, 2017, Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 25, 348, 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00660 Watters, 2017, Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves for severe femoral and tibial bone loss in revision TKA, J Arthroplasty, 32, 3468, 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.025 Graichen, 2015, Direct, cementless, metaphyseal fixation in knee revision arthroplasty with sleeves-short-term results, J Arthroplasty, 30, 2256, 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.030 Faizan, 2017, Development and verification of novel porous titanium metaphyseal cones for revision total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 32, 1946, 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.013 Bobyn, 1999, Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, 907, 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9283 Meneghini, 2009, Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 91, 131, 10.2106/JBJS.H.01061 Howard, 2011, Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, 478, 10.2106/JBJS.I.01322 Long, 2009, Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up, J Arthroplasty, 24, 1086, 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011 Villanueva-Martinez, 2013, Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients, J Arthroplasty, 28, 988, 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.003 Schmitz, 2013, Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 28, 1556, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.028 Derome, 2014, Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes, J Arthroplasty, 29, 122, 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.033 Brown, 2015, The use of trabecular metal cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 30, 90, 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.048 Jensen, 2014, Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia, Knee, 21, 1233, 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.017 Girerd, 2016, Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 102, 429, 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.010 Bohl, 2018, Do porous tantalum metaphyseal cones improve outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty?, J Arthroplasty, 33, 171, 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.033 Beckmann, 2015, Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones-a systematic review, J Arthroplasty, 30, 249, 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016 Kamath, 2015, Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97, 216, 10.2106/JBJS.N.00540 Lachiewicz, 2012, Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, 199, 10.1007/s11999-011-1888-9