Board of directors' governance challenges and earnings management

Emerald - 2009
Ruth W.Epps1, Tariq H.Ismail2
1School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
2Faculty of Commerce, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between corporate governance and earnings management in US context and provide further insights on the effects of board of directors' characteristics on earnings management.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a sample of three groups of US firms; where firms with relatively high negative, firms with relatively high positive, and those with low levels of discretionary accruals in the year 2004 are examined. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, board of directors' characteristics, and possible relationships between corporate governance variables and earnings management proxy provide the basis for discussion.FindingsFirms with annually elected boards, small size boards, 100 percent independent nominating committees, and 100 percent independent compensation committees have more negative discretionary accruals. However, firms with 75‐90 percent independent board or firms with a board size of between nine and 12 have higher positive discretionary accruals.Research limitations/implicationsCertain board characteristics may be the important factors associated with constraining the propensity of managers to engage in earnings management.Practical implicationsResults are limited by the accuracy of the models applied to isolate discretionary accruals. Additionally, the direction diverse of discretionary accruals may differ with selecting a time series of three or more years as a base for the analysis.Originality/valueIn contrast to prior literature, where board composition is defined as an insiders‐ or outsiders‐controlled board, this paper classifies board composition into seven discrete categories, using the same seven categories employed by Institutional Shareholder Services in evaluating and assigning corporate governance quotient scores to firms. The paper's major contributions to the existing literature are its findings that income‐increasing and income‐decreasing discretionary accruals have a different relationship with corporate governance practices and its expansion of the scope of corporate governance from board independence and audit committee independence to other corporate governance characteristics. This paper provides evidence that supports US regulators' initiatives that stronger corporate governance mechanisms provide greater monitoring of the financial accounting process and may be the important factors in improving the integrity of financial reporting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andres, A.P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F.J. (2005), “Corporate boards in OECD countries: size, composition, functioning and effectiveness”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 197‐210.

Ashbaugh, H., Collins, D.W. and LaFond, R. (2004), “Corporate governance and the cost of equity capital”, working paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Barnhart, S.W., Marr, M.W. and Rosenstein, S. (1998), “Board composition, managerial ownership and firm performance: an empirical analysis”, The Financial Review, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 1‐16.

Bathala, C.T. and Rao, R.P. (1995), “The determinants of board composition: an agency theory perspective”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 59‐69.

Baysinger, B.D. and Butler, H. (1985), “Corporate governance and the boards of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 101‐34.

Beasley, M.S. (1996), “An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 71, pp. 443‐65.

Becker, C.L., DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J.J. and Subramanyam, K.R. (1998), “The effect of audit quality on earnings management”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 1‐24.

Berger, P.G., Ofek, E. and Yermack, D. (1997), “Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 1411‐38.

Bhagat, S. and Black, B. (1999), “The uncertain relationship between composition and firm performance”, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 54, pp. 921‐63.

Braun, M. and Sharma, A. (2007), “Should the CEO also be chair of the board? An examination of family‐controlled public firms”, Family Business Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 111‐26.

Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L. and Jarrell, G.A. (1997), “Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 3, pp. 189‐220.

Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L. and Jarrell, G.A. (2000), “Corporate leadership structure: on the separation of the positions of CEO and chairman of the board”, working paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm/abstract_id=6124 (accessed May 16, 2006).

Byrd, J.W. and Hickman, K.A. (1992), “Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 195‐221.

Cheng, Q. and Warfield, T. (2005), “Equity incentives and earnings management”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 80 No. 2, pp. 441‐76.

Conyon, M.J. and Peck, S.I. (1998), “Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countries”, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 291‐304.

Core, J.E., Holthausen, R.W. and Larcker, D.F. (1999), “Corporate governance, chief executive officer and firm performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 371‐406.

Davidson, R., Goodwin, J. and Kent, P. (2005), “Internal governance structures and earnings management”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 241‐68.

Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G. and Sweeney, A.P. (1996), “Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by SEC”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 1‐13.

DeFond, M.L. and Subramanyam, K.R. (1998), “Auditor changes and discretionary accruals”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 35‐67.

Ebrahim, A. (2007), “Earnings management and board activity: additional evidence”, Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 42‐58.

Elsayed, K.K. (2007), “Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance?”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1203‐14.

Faleye, O. (2003), “Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure”, paper presented at the EFMA 2003 Helsinki Meetings, available at: DOI:10.2139/ssrn.394980 (accessed March 20, 2006).

Fizel, J.L. and Louie, K.K. (1990), “CEO retention, firm performance, and corporate governance”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 167‐76.

Francis, J.R., Maydew, E.L. and Sparks, H.C. (1999), “The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 17‐34.

Gillan, S.L., Hartzell, J.C. and Starks, L.T. (2003), “Explaining corporate governance: boards, bylaws and charter provisions”, working paper, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, TX, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=442740 (accessed June 26, 2006).

Hart, O. (1995), Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Hartzell, J.C. and Starks, L.T. (2003), “Institutional investors and executive compensation”, paper presented at the AFA 2003 Meetings, Washington, DC, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=236592 (accessed June 18, 2006).

Healy, P.M. and Wahlen, J.M. (1999), “A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 365‐83.

Huther, J. (1997), “An empirical test of the effect of board size on firm efficiency”, Economics Letters, Vol. 54, pp. 259‐64.

Jensen, M. (1993), “The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, pp. 831‐80.

Jensen, M. and Warner, J. (1988), “The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders and director”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 3‐24.

Jones, J.J. (1991), “Earnings management during import relief investigations”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 29, pp. 193‐228.

Karpoff, J.M., Malatesta, P.H. and Walkling, R.A. (1996), “Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: empirical evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 365‐95.

Kiel, G.C. and Nicholson, G.J. (2003), “Board composition and corporate performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance”, Board Composition and Corporate Performance, Vol. 11, pp. 189‐205.

Klein, A. (1998), “Firm performance and board committee structure”, Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 41 No. 10, pp. 275‐303.

Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J. and Wasley, C. (2005), “Performance matched discretionary accrual measures”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 163‐97.

Lai, L. and Tam, H. (2007), “Independent directors and the propensity to smooth earnings: a study of corporate governance in China”, The Business Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 328‐36.

McKinsey & Company (2002), Global Investor Opinion Survey: Key Findings, available at: www.mckinsey.com/governance (accessed November 3, 2007).

Mangel, R. and Singh, H. (1993), “Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large US corporations”, Accounting & Business Research, Vol. 23, pp. 339‐50.

Niu, F.F. (2006), “Corporate governance and the quality of accounting earnings: a Canadian perspective”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 302‐27.

Osma, B. and Noguer, G. (2007), “The effect of the board composition and its monitoring committees on earnings management: evidence from Spain”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1413‐28.

Peasnell, K.V., Pope, P.F. and Young, S. (2005), “Board monitoring and earnings management: do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 32, pp. 1311‐46.

Piot, C. and Janin, R. (2007), “External auditors, audit committees and earnings management in France”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 429‐54.

Rahman, R. and Ali, F. (2006), “Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 783‐804.

Rangan, S. (1998), “Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 50, pp. 101‐22.

Romano, R. (2005), “The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 114, p. 1521.

Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J.G. (1990), “Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 175‐91.

Shen, C.H. and Chih, H. (2007), “Earnings management and corporate governance in Asia's emerging markets”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 999‐1021.

Subramanyam, K.R. (1996), “The pricing of discretionary accruals”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 249‐81.

Teoh, S.H., Welch, I. and Wong, T.J. (1998), “Earnings management and the long‐run market performance of initial public offerings”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, pp. 19‐35.

Vafeas, N. (1999), “Board meeting frequency and firm performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, pp. 113‐42.

Yermack, D. (1996), “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 185‐211.

SEC (2002), Acceleration of Periodic Report Filing Dates and Disclosure Concerning Website Access to Reports, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.