Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: Analysis of safety and outcomes

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International - Tập 18 - Trang 181-187 - 2019
Vishal Gupta1, Saket Kumar1, Vivek Gupta2, Pradeep Joshi1, Rahul Rahul1, Rakesh Kumar Yadav1, Amit Dangi1, Abhijit Chandra1
1Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Human Organ Transplant, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jagad, 2008, Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: our approach, Hepatogastroenterology, 55, 275 Yeo, 1997, Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes, Ann Surg, 226, 248, 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004 Lupascu, 2011, Technical tailoring of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with hepatic artery anatomic variants, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 10, 638, 10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60108-2 Georgescu, 2014, Hind right approach pancreaticoduodenectomy: from skill to indications, Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2014, 10.1155/2014/210835 Mishra, 2011, Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal, Dig Surg, 28, 281, 10.1159/000329584 Cameron, 1993, One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality, Ann Surg, 217, 430, 10.1097/00000658-199305010-00002 Grobmyer, 2010, Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications, J Am Coll Surg, 210, 54, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.020 Aranha, 2003, Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy, J Am Coll Surg, 197, 223, 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00331-4 Machado, 2012, Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management-review, Int J Surg Oncol, 2012 Shrikhande, 2017, Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), Surgery, 161, 1221, 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.021 Blumgart, 2001, 2000 Hirche, 2015, Safety of Blumgart′s anastomosis during Traverso operation is independent of diagnosis and risk factors for pancreaticojejunal anastomotic failure, Global J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 3, 50, 10.12970/2308-6483.2015.03.02.3 Wang, 2016, Comparison of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy, HPB (Oxford), 18, 229, 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.007 Kleespies, 2009, Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection, Br J Surg, 96, 741, 10.1002/bjs.6634 Fujii, 2014, Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study, J Gastrointest Surg, 18, 1108, 10.1007/s11605-014-2523-3 Hirono, 2019, Modified Blumgart mattress suture versus conventional interrupted suture in pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled trial, Ann Surg, 269, 243, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002802 Wang, 2018, Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score-matched study, Surgery, 164, 1162, 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.031 Dindo, 2004, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey, Ann Surg, 240, 205, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Wente, 2007, Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), Surgery, 142, 761, 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005 Wente, 2007, Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition, Surgery, 142, 20, 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001 Bassi, 2005, Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition, Surgery, 138, 8, 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 Hartwig, 2014, Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), Surgery, 156, 1, 10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.009 Bassi, 2017, The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after, Surgery, 161, 584, 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014 Callery, 2013, A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy, J Am Coll Surg, 216, 1, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002 Venkat, 2011, Predicting the risk of perioperative mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a novel scoring system, Arch Surg, 146, 1277, 10.1001/archsurg.2011.294 Blamey, 1983, Prediction of risk in biliary surgery, Br J Surg, 70, 535, 10.1002/bjs.1800700910 Müftüoglu, 2003, A novel reconstructive procedure after pancreaticoduodenectomy: J-pouch dunking pancreaticojejunostomy, Hepatogastroenterology, 50, 2233 Peng, 2004, Binding pancreaticojejunostomy – a safe and reliable anastomosis procedure, HPB (Oxford), 6, 154, 10.1080/13651820410016598 Topal, 2013, Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial, Lancet Oncol, 14, 655, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8 Liu, 2015, Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials, HPB (Oxford), 17, 123, 10.1111/hpb.12279 Kleespies, 2008, The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 393, 459, 10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4 Daamen, 2018, A web-based overview, systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreatic anastomosis techniques following pancreatoduodenectomy, HPB (Oxford), 20, 777, 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.003 Xiong, 2012, Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy, Br J Surg, 99, 1050, 10.1002/bjs.8788 Dong, 2016, Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev Pratt, 2007, Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme, Ann Surg, 245, 443, 10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2 Reid-Lombardo, 2007, Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group, J Gastrointest Surg, 11, 1451, 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4 Liang, 2007, Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: diagnosed according to International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition, Pancreatology, 7, 325, 10.1159/000105498 Fuks, 2009, Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors, Am J Surg, 197, 702, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004 Yeh, 1997, Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy – multivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors, J Surg Res, 67, 119, 10.1006/jsre.1996.4974 Gouma, 2000, Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume, Ann Surg, 232, 786, 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007 Kollmar, 2007, Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors, J Gastrointest Surg, 11, 1699, 10.1007/s11605-007-0258-0 Yeo, 1995, A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy, Ann Surg, 222, 580, 10.1097/00000658-199510000-00014 Miller, 2014, A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy, J Gastrointest Surg, 18, 172, 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8