Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry
Tóm tắt
Fitting a line to a bivariate dataset can be a deceptively complex problem, and there has been much debate on this issue in the literature. In this review, we describe for the practitioner the essential features of line‐fitting methods for estimating the relationship between two variables: what methods are commonly used, which method should be used when, and how to make inferences from these lines to answer common research questions.
A particularly important point for line‐fitting in allometry is that usually, two sources of error are present (which we call measurement and equation error), and these have quite different implications for choice of line‐fitting method. As a consequence, the approach in this review and the methods presented have subtle but important differences from previous reviews in the biology literature.
Linear regression, major axis and standardised major axis are alternative methods that can be appropriate when there is no measurement error. When there is measurement error, this often needs to be estimated and used to adjust the variance terms in formulae for line‐fitting. We also review line‐fitting methods for phylogenetic analyses.
Methods of inference are described for the line‐fitting techniques discussed in this paper. The types of inference considered here are testing if the slope or elevation equals a given value, constructing confidence intervals for the slope or elevation, comparing several slopes or elevations, and testing for shift along the axis amongst several groups. In some cases several methods have been proposed in the literature. These are discussed and compared. In other cases there is little or no previous guidance available in the literature.
Simulations were conducted to check whether the methods of inference proposed have the intended coverage probability or Type I error. We identified the methods of inference that perform well and recommend the techniques that should be adopted in future work.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson T. W., 1984, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Chambers J. M., 1983, Graphical Methods for Data Analysis
Cox D. R., 1958, Planning of Experiments
Creasy M. A., 1957, Confidence limits for the gradient in the linear functional relationship, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 18, 65
Galton F., 1886, Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature, Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 15, 246
Harvey P. H., 1982, Current Problems in Sociobiology, 343
Harvey P. H., 1991, The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, 10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001
Jolicoeur P., 1968, Intervalles de confiance pour la pente de l'axe majeur d'une distribution normale bidimensionnelle, Biometrie-Praximetrie, 9, 121
Jolliffe I. T., 2002, Principal Components Analysis
Kendall M. G., 1969, The Advanced Theory of Statistics
Kendall M. G., 1973, The Advanced Theory of Statistics
Legendre P., 1998, Numerical Ecology
Miller R. G., 1986, Beyond ANOVA, Basks of Applied Statistics
Nair K. R., 1942, On a simple method of curve fitting, Sankhya, 6, 121
Niklas K. J., 1994, Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process
Rayner J. M. V., 1985, Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions, Journal of Zoology, Ser. A, 206, 415, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb05668.x
Ricker W. E., 1982, Linear regression for naturally variable data, Biometrics, 38, 859
Sokal R. R., 1969, Biometry – The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal R. R.&Rohlf F. J.(1995).Biometry – The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research 3rd Edn.W. H.Freeman New York.
Sprent P., 1969, Models in Regression and Related Topics
Warton D. I.(in press). Robustness to failure of assumptions of tests for a common slope amongst several allometric lines – a simulation study.Biometrical Journal.
Westfall P. H., 1993, P‐value Adjustment