Bioprinting of novel 3D tumor array chip for drug screening

Bio-Design and Manufacturing - Tập 3 - Trang 175-188 - 2020
Mingjun Xie1,2, Qing Gao1,2, Jianzhong Fu1,2, Zichen Chen1,2, Yong He1,2
1State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
2Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Process and Equipment of Zhejiang Province, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Tóm tắt

Biomedical field has been seeking a feasible standard drug screening system consisting of 3D tumor model array for drug researching due to providing sufficient samples and simulating actual in vivo tumor growth situation, which is still a challenge to rapidly and uniformly establish though. Here, we propose a novel drug screening system, namely 3D tumor array chip with “layer cake” structure, for drug screening. Accurate gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel droplets (~ 0.1 μL) containing tumor cells can be automatically deposited on demand with electrohydrodynamic 3D printing. Transparent conductive membrane is introduced as a chip basement for preventing charges accumulation during fabricating and convenient observing during screening. Culturing chambers formed by stainless steel and silicon interlayer is convenient to be assembled and recycled. As this chip is compatible with the existing 96-well culturing plate, the drug screening protocols could keep the same as convention. Important properties of this chip, namely printing stability, customizability, accuracy, microenvironment, tumor functionalization, are detailly examined. As a demonstration, it is applied for screening of epirubicin and paclitaxel with breast tumor cells to confirm the compatibility of the proposed screening system with the traditional screening methods. We believe this chip will potentially play a significant role in drug evaluation in the future.

Tài liệu tham khảo

DeVita VT, Chu E (2008) A history of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res 68:8643. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6611 Eglen RM, Randle DH (2015) Drug discovery goes three-dimensional: goodbye to flat high-throughput screening? Assay Drug Dev Technol 13:262–265. https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2015.647 Santo VE, Rebelo SP, Estrada MF, Alves PM, Boghaert E, Brito C (2017) Drug screening in 3D in vitro tumor models: overcoming current pitfalls of efficacy read-outs. Biotechnol J 12:1600505. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600505 Liu Y, Shao C, Bian F, Yu Y, Wang H, Zhao Y (2018) Egg component-composited inverse opal particles for synergistic drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:17058–17064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b03483 Wu Z, Yu Y, Zou M, Liu Y, Bian F, Zhao Y (2018) Peanut-inspired anisotropic microparticles from microfluidics. Compos Commun 10:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.09.007 Yu Y, Fu F, Shang L, Cheng Y, Gu Z, Zhao Y (2017) Bioinspired helical microfibers from microfluidics. Adv Mater 29:1605765. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605765 Zhang H, Liu Y, Wang J, Shao C, Zhao Y (2019) Tofu-inspired microcarriers from droplet microfluidics for drug delivery. Sci China Chem 62:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-018-9340-y Zhao Y, Gu H, Xie Z, Shum HC, Wang B, Gu Z (2013) Bioinspired multifunctional janus particles for droplet manipulation. J Am Chem Soc 135:54–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310389w Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P (2012) A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:6020–6041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 Nam K-H, Smith AST, Lone S, Kwon S, Kim D-H (2014) Biomimetic 3D tissue models for advanced high-throughput drug screening. J Lab Autom 20:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068214557813 Shin CS, Kwak B, Han B, Park K (2013) Development of an in vitro 3D tumor model to study therapeutic efficiency of an anticancer drug. Mol Pharm 10:2167–2175. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp300595a Cheng R, Yan Y, Liu H, Chen H, Pan G, Deng L, Cui W (2018) Mechanically enhanced lipo-hydrogel with controlled release of multi-type drugs for bone regeneration. Appl Mater Today 12:294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.06.008 Modaresifar K, Hadjizadeh A, Niknejad H (2017) Design and fabrication of GelMA/chitosan nanoparticles composite hydrogel for angiogenic growth factor delivery. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2017.1392970 Morales AW, Zhang YS, Aleman J, Alerasool P, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A, Ye JY (2016) Label-free detection of protein molecules secreted from an organ-on-a-chip model for drug toxicity assays. In: SPIE BiOS. SPIE, p 5 Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A (2010) Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31:5536–5544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 Nie J, Gao Q, Wang Y, Zeng J, Zhao H, Sun Y, Shen J, Ramezani H, Fu Z, Liu Z, Xiang M, Fu J, Zhao P, Chen W, He Y (2018) Vessel-on-a-chip with hydrogel-based microfluidics. Small 14:1802368. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802368 Shao L, Gao Q, Xie C, Fu J, Xiang M, He Y (2019) Bioprinting of cell-laden microfiber: can it become a standard product? Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201900014 Shao L, Gao Q, Zhao H, Xie C, Fu J, Liu Z, Xiang M, He Y (2018) Fiber-based mini tissue with morphology-controllable GelMA microfibers. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802187 Rose BJ, Pacelli S, Haj JA, Dua SH, Hopkinson A, White JL, Rose RF (2014) Gelatin-based materials in ocular tissue engineering. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7043106 Xianbin D (2018) 3D bio-printing review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 301:12023 Yoon HJ, Shin SR, Cha JM, Lee S-H, Kim J-H, Do JT, Song H, Bae H (2016) Cold water fish gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel for tissue engineering application. PLoS ONE 11:e0163902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163902 Gao Q, Niu X, Shao L, Zhou L, Lin Z, Sun A, Fu J, Chen Z, Hu J, Liu Y, He Y (2019) 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication 11:35006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 Hassanzadeh P, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Rosenzweig R, Zhang X, Khademhosseini A, Annabi N, Rolandi M (2016) Ultrastrong and flexible hybrid hydrogels based on solution self-assembly of chitin nanofibers in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). J Mater Chem B 4:2539–2543. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB00021E McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, Campbell J, Sharon A, Sauer-Budge AF (2017) 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts. Biofabrication 9:15009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bd Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A (2015) Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73:254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 Chen X, Bai S, Li B, Liu H, Wu G, Liu S, Zhao Y (2016) Fabrication of gelatin methacrylate/nanohydroxyapatite microgel arrays for periodontal tissue regeneration. Int J Nanomed 11:4707–4718. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S111701 Peela N, Sam FS, Christenson W, Truong D, Watson AW, Mouneimne G, Ros R, Nikkhah M (2016) A three dimensional micropatterned tumor model for breast cancer cell migration studies. Biomaterials 81:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039 Yan X, Zhou L, Wu Z, Wang X, Chen X, Yang F, Guo Y, Wu M, Chen Y, Li W, Wang J, Du Y (2019) High throughput scaffold-based 3D micro-tumor array for efficient drug screening and chemosensitivity testing. Biomaterials 198:167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.020 Cui X, Dean D, Ruggeri ZM, Boland T (2010) Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:963–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22762 Barrero A, Loscertales IG (2006) Micro- and nanoparticles via capillary flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:89–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110245 Fernández de la Mora J (2006) The fluid dynamics of Taylor Cones. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:217–243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110159 Xie M, Gao Q, Zhao H, Nie J, Fu Z, Wang H, Chen L, Shao L, Fu J, Chen Z, He Y (2019) Electro-assisted bioprinting of low-concentration GelMA microdroplets. Small 15:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201804216 Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA, Obermann EC, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Oertle P, Hyotyla JT, Aebi U, Bentires-Alj M, Lim RYH, Schoenenberger C-A (2012) The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 7:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.167 Zhao X, Liu S, Yildirimer L, Zhao H, Ding R, Wang H, Cui W, Weitz D (2016) Injectable stem cell-laden photocrosslinkable microspheres fabricated using microfluidics for rapid generation of osteogenic tissue constructs. Adv Funct Mater 26:2809–2819. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201504943 Deryugina EI, Quigley JP (2006) Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25:9–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9 Jung HY, Fattet L, Yang J (2015) Molecular pathways: linking tumor microenvironment to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 21:962. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3173 Liang C, Xu L, Song G, Liu Z (2016) Emerging nanomedicine approaches fighting tumor metastasis: animal models, metastasis-targeted drug delivery, phototherapy, and immunotherapy. Chem Soc Rev 45:6250–6269. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00458J Polacheck WJ, Zervantonakis IK, Kamm RD (2013) Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:1335–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1115-1 Wagenblast E, Soto M, Gutiérrez-Ángel S, Hartl CA, Gable AL, Maceli AR, Erard N, Williams AM, Kim SY, Dickopf S, Harrell JC, Smith AD, Perou CM, Wilkinson JE, Hannon GJ, Knott SRV (2015) A model of breast cancer heterogeneity reveals vascular mimicry as a driver of metastasis. Nature 520:358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14403https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14403%23supplementary-information Aramaki T, Moriguchi M, Bekku E, Asakura K, Sawada A, Endo M (2013) Comparison of epirubicin hydrochloride and miriplatin hydrate as anticancer agents for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 43:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01100.x Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM (2015) Evaluation of chemotherapeutics in a three-dimensional breast cancer model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141:951–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1950-1 Lu CT, Zhao YZ, Wu Y, Tian XQ, Li WF, Huang PT, Li XK, Sun CZ, Zhang L (2011) Experiment on enhancing antitumor effect of intravenous epirubicin hydrochloride by acoustic cavitation in situ combined with phospholipid-based microbubbles. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:343–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1489-4 Zhang L, Li G, Gao M, Liu X, Ji B, Hua R, Zhou Y, Yang Y (2016) RGD-peptide conjugated inulin-ibuprofen nanoparticles for targeted delivery of Epirubicin. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 144:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.077