Biophysical profiles

Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology - Tập 7 - Trang 74-81 - 1997
S.A. Walkinshaw

Tài liệu tham khảo

Manning, 1990, Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring IV: an analysis of perinatal mortality and morbidity, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162, 703, 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90990-O Miller, 1996, The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174, 812, 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70305-8 Thacker, 1986, Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum fetal surveillance techniques, Obstet Gynecol Survey, 41, 121, 10.1097/00006254-198603000-00001 Manning, 1980, Antepartum fetal evaluation. Development of a fetal biophysical profile, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 136, 787, 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90457-3 Vintzileos, 1983, The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value, Obstet Gynecol, 62, 271, 10.1097/00006250-198309000-00001 Manning, 1995, Dynamic ultrasound based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical score, Clinical Obstet Gynecol, 38, 26, 10.1097/00003081-199503000-00006 Vintzileos, 1987, The relationships among the fetal biophysical profile, umbilical cord pH, and Apgar scores, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 157, 627, 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80018-2 Ribbert, 1990, Relationship of fetal biophysical profile and blood gas values at cordocentesis in severely growth retarded fetuses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163, 569, 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91199-M Vyas, 1989, Renal artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and hypoxaemic fetuses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 161, 168, 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90257-3 Manning, 1993, Fetal biophysical score: VI Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 169, 755, 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90002-Z Schifrin, 1981, The role of real time scanning in antenatal fetal surveillance, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 140, 525, 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90228-3 Platt, 1983, Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile, Obstet Gynecol, 61, 480 Roussis, 1991, Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: detection of infection, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 165, 1099, 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90479-B Walkinshaw, 1992, The prediction of fetal compromise and acidosis by biophysical profile scoring in the small for gestational age fetus, J Perinatal Med, 20, 227, 10.1515/jpme.1992.20.3.227 Walkinshaw, 1993, Biophysical profile scoring: a critical review, 151 Vintzileos, 1991, Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 165, 707, 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90314-H Arabin, 1993, Evaluation of the fetal assessment score in pregnancies at risk for intra-uterine hypoxia, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 169, 549, 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90618-S Manning, 1984, Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial, Obstet Gynecol, 64, 326 Platt, 1985, A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile score versus the nonstress test in the management of high risk pregnancies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 153, 624 Nageotte, 1994, Perinatal outcome with modified biophysical profile, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 170, 1672, 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70339-6 Alfirevic, 1995, A randomised controlled trial of simple versus complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks gestation, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 102, 638, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11402.x Alfirevic, 1996, Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancy Baskett, 1987, Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death, Obstet Gynecol, 70, 357 Manning, 1990, Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring III. Positive predictive accuracy of the very abnormal test (biophysical profile score = 0), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162, 398, 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90395-N Manning, 1990, The abnormal fetal biophysical score V. Predictive accuracy according to score composition, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162, 918, 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91292-K Devoe, 1992, Refining the biophysical profile with a risk related evaluation of test performance, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 167, 346, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91413-6 Devoe, 1995, Computerised fetal biophysical assessment, Clinical Obstet Gynecol, 38, 121, 10.1097/00003081-199503000-00013 Ribbert, 1993, Prediction of fetal acidaemia in intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of quantified fetal activity with biophysical profile scoring, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, 653, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14233.x Mills, 1990, Two-tier approach to biophysical assessment of the fetus, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163, 12, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90656-5 Ocak, 1994, Is the fetal biophysical profile with all parameters needed?, J Maternal Fetal Investigation, 4, 37 Bracero, 1996, Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, nonstress test and biophysical profile in pregnancies complicated by diabetes, J Ultrasound Med, 15, 301, 10.7863/jum.1996.15.4.301 James, 1992, Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasound characteristics, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166, 1486, 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91624-J Johnson, 1986, Biophysical profile scoring in the management of the post term pregnancy: an analysis of 307 patients, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 154, 269, 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90653-8 Medina, 1994, Biophysical profile in twin pregnancy: prospective study, Review Chili Obstet Ginecol, 59, 343 Golde, 1984, The role of nonstress tests, biophysical profile and contraction stress test in the outpatient management of insulin dependent diabetic pregnancies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 148, 269, 10.1016/S0002-9378(84)80066-6 Dicker, 1988, Fetal surveillance in insulin dependent diabetic pregnancy: predictive value of the biophysical profile, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 159, 800, 10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80139-X Johnson, 1988, Biophysical profile scoring in the management of the diabetic pregnancy, Obstet Gynecol, 72, 841, 10.1097/00006250-198812000-00005 Landon, 1992, Fetal surveillance in pregnancies complicated by insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 167, 617, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91560-9 Girz, 1992, Sudden fetal death in women with well controlled intensively monitored gestational diabetes, J Perinatology, 12, 229 Salvesen, 1993, Prediction of fetal acidaemia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus by biophysical profile scoring and fetal heart rate monitoring, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, 227, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15235.x Vintzileos, 1985, The fetal biophysical profile in patients with premature rupture of the membranes. An early indicator of infection, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 152, 510, 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90617-9 Vintzileos, 1986, Fetal biophysical profile versus amniocentesis in predicting infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes, Obstet Gynecol, 68, 488 Gauthier, 1992, Biophysical profile as a predictor of amniotic fluid culture results, Obstet Gynecol, 80, 102 Carroll, 1995, Assessment of fetal activity and amniotic fluid volume in the prediction of intrauterine infection in preterm prelabour amniorrhexis, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172, 1427, 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90473-5 Fleming, 1991, The relationships among umbilical artery velocimetry, fetal biophysical profile, and placental inflammation in preterm premature rupture of the membranes, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 164, 38, 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90619-3 Vintzileos, 1995, Fetal biophysical assessment in preterm premature rupture of the membranes, Clinical Obstet Gynecol, 38, 45, 10.1097/00003081-199503000-00007 Goldstein, 1988, Fetal body and breathing movements as predictors of intraamniotic infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 159, 363, 10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80085-1 Devoe, 1994, Can fetal biophysical observations anticipate outcome in preterm labour of premature rupture of the membranes, Obstet Gynecol, 84, 432