Biomechanics of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Dog II. Mechanical Properties

Veterinary Surgery - Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 113-118 - 1983
David L. Butler1, Donald A. Hulse2, Matthew D. Kay1, Edward S. Grood1, Peter K. Shires2, Robert D’Ambrosia3, Hiromu Shoji3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
2Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Tóm tắt

A biomechanical analysis of the results of an over‐the‐top procedure for replacement of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) in the dog is presented. Using 15 adult mongrel dogs, the CCL in one stifle joint was reconstructed using fascia lata and the lateral one‐third of the patellar ligament. The opposite CCL served as the control. Animals were sacrificed at 0, 4, 12 and 26 weeks postoperation and axial failure tests were performed. Stiffness, maximum load, and elastic modulus of the replacement increased over time, while elongation to maximum load continually decreased as compared to controls. Other parameters showed less consistent trends.

The results are encouraging given the reduction in joint laxity and the increases in tissue stiffness and strength. However, the ligament substitute was still unable to replicate the mechanical properties of the normal cruciate ligament. Longer studies therefore are required to determine if this replacement is capable of completely restoring joint stability and normal function.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Butler DL, 1979, Mechanical properties of transplants for the anterior cruciate ligament, Orthopaedic Transactions, 4, 81

Noyes FR, 1983, Intra‐articular reconstruction. Part I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization and immediate motion after replacement, Clin Orthop, 172, 71, 10.1097/00003086-198301000-00014

Paulos LE, 1983, Intra‐articular reconstruction. Part II: Replacement with vascularized patellar tendon, Clin Orthop, 172, 78, 10.1097/00003086-198301000-00015

10.1111/j.1532-950X.1980.tb01669.x

10.1111/j.1532-950X.1983.tb00719.x

ButlerDL GroodES NoyesFR BrackettK. ZernickeRF. Unpublished data.

1969, Cross‐sectional area measurements for tendon specimens. A comparison of several methods, J Biomech, 2, 175, 10.1016/0021-9290(69)90029-3

Noyes FR, 1974, Biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure: An analysis of strain‐rate sensitivity and mechanisms of failure in primates, J Bone Joint Surg, 56, 236, 10.2106/00004623-197456020-00002

10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00808.x

10.1007/BF02474358

Grood ES, 1976, Cruciate ligament prosthesis: strength, creep and fatigue properties, J Bone Joint Surg, 58, 1083, 10.2106/00004623-197658080-00007

LewisJL ShybutGT.In vivoforces in the collateral ligaments of canine knees. Transactions of the 27th Orthopedic Research Society1981;4.

HulseDA ShiresPK.Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Annual Meeting 1981;27.

Clancy N., 1981, Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rhesus monkeys. A histologic, microangiographic and biomechanical analysis, J Bone Joint Surg, 62, 1270, 10.2106/00004623-198163080-00008