Biomechanical pregnant pelvic system model and numerical simulation of childbirth: impact of delivery on the uterosacral ligaments, preliminary results

International Urogynecology Journal - Tập 26 Số 4 - Trang 497-504 - 2015
Jean-Yves Lepage1, Charles Jayyosi1, Pauline Lecomte‐Grosbras2,3, Mathias Brieu2,3, Christian Duriez4, Michel Cosson3,1, Chrystèle Rubod3,1
1Service de Gynécologie - Obstétrique [Lille]
2Centrale Lille
3Laboratoire de Mécanique de Lille - FRE 3723
4Deformable Robots Simulation Team

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(5):579–585

Goh JT (2003) Biomechanical and biochemical assessments for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:391–394. Available via http://journals.lww.com/coobgyn/Fulltext/2003/10000/Biomechanical_and_biochemical_assessments_for.7.aspx . Accessed 12 Nov 2013

Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305

Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(2):277–285

Schaal J-P, Riethmuller D, Maillet R (1998) Mécanique et techniques obstétricales [Internet]. Sauramps Médical. Available via http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=2161713 . Accessed 12 Nov 2013

Moreau R, Pham MT, Silveira R, Redarce T, Brun X, Dupuis O (2007) Design of a new instrumented forceps: application to safe obstetrical forceps blade placement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(7):1280–1290

Parente MP, Natal Jorge RM, Mascarenhas T, Silva-Filho AL (2010) The influence of pelvic muscle activation during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 115(4):804–808

Li X, Kruger JA, Nash MP, Nielsen PMF (2011) Anisotropic effects of the levator ani muscle during childbirth. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10(4):485–494

Venugopala Rao G, Rubod C, Brieu M, Bhatnagar N, Cosson M (2010) Experiments and finite element modelling for the study of prolapse in the pelvic floor system. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 13(3):349–357

Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz JF, Dubois P, Brieu M (2013) Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model. Int Urogynecol J 24(1):105–112

Kamina P, Demondion X, Richer JP, Scepi M, Faure JP (2003) Anatomie clinique de l’appareil génital féminin. Encycl Méd Chir Ed Sci Méd Elsevier SAS Paris Gynécol 10:A10

Créquat J, Duyme M, Brodaty G (2000) Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 28(6):435–445

Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz J-F, Brieu M (2011) Biomechanical modeling of pelvic organ mobility: towards personalized medicine. Bull Acad Natl Med 195(8):1869–1883, discussion 1883

Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Dubois P, Cosson M (2007) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. Part 1: new experimental protocol. J Urol 178(1):320–325

Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Jean-Charles C, Dubois P, Cosson M (2008) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):811–816

Rubod C, Brieu M, Cosson M, Rivaux G, Clay J-C, de Landsheere L et al (2012) Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. Urology 79(4):968.e17–968.e22

Rahn DD, Ruff MD, Brown SA, Tibbals HF, Word RA (2008) Biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall: effect of pregnancy, elastic fiber deficiency, and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(5):590.e1–590.e6

Badir S, Bajka M, Mazza E (2013) A novel procedure for the mechanical characterization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 27:143–153. Available via http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616112003323 . Accessed 30 Jul 2013

Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA (2006) Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal 10(2):125–136

Allard J, Cotin S, Faure F, Bensoussan P-J, Poyer F, Duriez C et al (2007) SOFA–an open source framework for medical simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 125:13–18

Parente MP, Natal Jorge RM, Mascarenhas T, Fernandes AA, Silva-Filho AL (2010) Computational modeling approach to study the effects of fetal head flexion during vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(3):217.e1–217.e6

Buttin R, Zara F, Shariat B, Redarce T, Grangé G (2011) Simulation biomécanique de la descente foetale sans trajectoire théorique imposée. Rev Electron Francoph Inform Graph 5(2):1–13

Bibin L, Anquez J, de la Plata Alcalde JP, Boubekeur T, Angelini ED, Bloch I (2010) Whole-body pregnant woman modeling by digital geometry processing with detailed uterofetal unit based on medical images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(10):2346–2358

Martins JAC, Pato MPM, Pires EB, Jorge RMN, Parente M, Mascarenhas T (2007) Finite element studies of the deformation of the pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1101(1):316–334

Hoyte L, Damaser MS, Warfield SK, Chukkapalli G, Majumdar A, Choi DJ et al (2008) Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(2):198.e1–198.e5